Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
Chat Board
 Top 40 Music on Compact Disc : Chat Board
Subject Topic: "Stir It Up" - Johnny Nash Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
EdisonLite
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 18 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2237
Posted: 22 October 2004 at 7:09am | IP Logged Quote EdisonLite

It seems that the famous version of Johnny Nash's "Stir It Up" (the remix that was released AFTER "I Can See Clearly Now" was a hit, not the earlier one) has never been on a US CD. I heard an mp3 a few years ago that was the remix, and it did not sound like it came from cleaned up vinyl -- so I was wondering if anyone knows of any import CDs that have this remix.
Back to Top View EdisonLite's Profile Search for other posts by EdisonLite Visit EdisonLite's Homepage
 
davidclark
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 17 November 2004
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1100
Posted: 24 February 2006 at 5:33am | IP Logged Quote davidclark

Hi there,

I believe that the Time Life CD "Sounds Of The Seventies 1973: Take Two" contains the hit 45. Sounds like it to me. Pat, Please take a listen again and see what you think.

__________________
dc1
Back to Top View davidclark's Profile Search for other posts by davidclark
 
Pat Downey
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 01 October 2003
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1742
Posted: 24 February 2006 at 6:38am | IP Logged Quote Pat Downey

Yes I agree that is the hit version and the database has been changed to reflect this. Thanks for your input David.
Back to Top View Pat Downey's Profile Search for other posts by Pat Downey
 
Grant
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 12 October 2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 211
Posted: 24 February 2006 at 5:49pm | IP Logged Quote Grant

What's the difference?
Back to Top View Grant's Profile Search for other posts by Grant
 
davidclark
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 17 November 2004
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1100
Posted: 24 February 2006 at 7:14pm | IP Logged Quote davidclark

the 1973 (hit) 45 is a different mix and contains a sound (not sure what, but it starts at :15) and extra background vocals during the chorus not present in the original 45/LP version

__________________
dc1
Back to Top View davidclark's Profile Search for other posts by davidclark
 
Grant
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 12 October 2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 211
Posted: 24 February 2006 at 11:07pm | IP Logged Quote Grant

davidclark wrote:
the 1973 (hit) 45 is a different mix and contains a sound (not sure what, but it starts at :15) and extra background vocals during the chorus not present in the original 45/LP version
   I'll see if I still have my copy on the yellow Epic label.

LATER: OK, I do have it, but I have to go into a closet and pull out hundreds of 45s in a big box. I'm not prepared to do that tonight. All I can tell you is that it must be the original pressing because it is the same as the one found on the Rock Artifacts CD volume 2 (?).

Edited by Grant on 24 February 2006 at 11:27pm
Back to Top View Grant's Profile Search for other posts by Grant
 
Gary Mack
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 06 February 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 158
Posted: 25 February 2006 at 12:45pm | IP Logged Quote Gary Mack

Epic re-serviced the promo 45 to radio stations, telling us that it was a new mix, and that's the one I have (we never did play it). Dead wax number reads 156881 1-C.

GM
Back to Top View Gary Mack's Profile Search for other posts by Gary Mack
 
jimct
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 07 April 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3906
Posted: 25 May 2007 at 10:31pm | IP Logged Quote jimct

My Epic 10949 hit version commercial 45 has a listed time of (3:09), but an actual time of (3:01), exactly as its lone 45v database appearance (the Time/Life 1973: Take Two V/A CD) does.
Back to Top View jimct's Profile Search for other posts by jimct
 
jrjr
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 28 December 2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 98
Posted: 27 May 2007 at 9:53pm | IP Logged Quote jrjr

actually, the re-release 45 of "stir it up" has a lot of weird percussion stuff going on, and the first time i heard it on American Top 40 it blew my mind and i immediately went out and bought a copy... if anyone is interested, i will shoot them a copy, and just for the record, so to speak, it was on the orange epic label of the mid-seventies, not the yellow one...
Back to Top View jrjr's Profile Search for other posts by jrjr
 
jimct
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 07 April 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3906
Posted: 27 May 2007 at 10:50pm | IP Logged Quote jimct

Jrjr, the 1973 re-release of "Stir It Up" came out just as Epic was switching over from the yellow to the orange label, and I happen to have 2 1973 commercial copies of it: one copy features the yellow label, and the other copy features the orange label. The same 1973 situation exists for both Clint Holmes' "Playground In My Mind", and the Edgar Winter Group's "Frankenstein." Pressing plants are often instructed to "use up" the old label design paper before starting with the new, which sometimes caused overlap. I probably have over 100 hit commercial 45s, on two different label designs, so it's actually not all that incredibly uncommon.
Back to Top View jimct's Profile Search for other posts by jimct
 
EdisonLite
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 18 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2237
Posted: 12 May 2011 at 6:05pm | IP Logged Quote EdisonLite

I heard this song on an old AT40 this weekend, and it seemed to be a 3rd mix. It was very close to the LP mix but near the end, there seemed to be some lead vocals missing and you could only hear the background vocals (like on "little darling"). Does anyone know of this 3rd mix and what it's from? I'm pretty sure those leads weren't muted in the LP version.
Back to Top View EdisonLite's Profile Search for other posts by EdisonLite Visit EdisonLite's Homepage
 
The Hits Man
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 04 February 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 665
Posted: 13 May 2011 at 12:57am | IP Logged Quote The Hits Man

First, jimct, it turns out I have the first 45 version on
the yellow Epic label.

The 45 version also appears on Rhino's "Soul Hits Of The
70s: volume 10".


__________________
Back to Top View The Hits Man's Profile Search for other posts by The Hits Man
 
aaronk
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Online
Posts: 6513
Posted: 13 May 2011 at 8:10am | IP Logged Quote aaronk

Just for clarification, Grant, the 45 version you are referencing on Soul Hits is the first, non-hit 45 version (which is the same as the LP version). Pat's database says:

(S)      (2:58)      Rhino 70790 Soul Hits Of The 70's Volume 10 (LP and first 45 version)

__________________
Aaron Kannowski
Uptown Sound
91.9 The Peak - Classic Hip Hop
Back to Top View aaronk's Profile Search for other posts by aaronk Visit aaronk's Homepage
 
Santi Paradoa
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 17 February 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1117
Posted: 13 May 2011 at 8:14am | IP Logged Quote Santi Paradoa

EdisonLite wrote:
I heard this song on an old AT40 this weekend, and it seemed to be a 3rd mix. It was very close to the LP mix but near the end, there seemed to be some lead vocals missing and you could only hear the background vocals (like on "little darling"). Does anyone know of this 3rd mix and what it's from? I'm pretty sure those leads weren't muted in the LP version.
So Gordon, are you saying you have identified a possible third mix of this song?

__________________
Santi Paradoa
Miami, Florida
Back to Top View Santi Paradoa's Profile Search for other posts by Santi Paradoa
 
EdisonLite
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 18 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2237
Posted: 13 May 2011 at 9:17am | IP Logged Quote EdisonLite

Yes, the version I heard on AT40 seemed different.

Edited by EdisonLite on 14 May 2011 at 9:22am
Back to Top View EdisonLite's Profile Search for other posts by EdisonLite Visit EdisonLite's Homepage
 
Bill Cahill
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 27 June 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 595
Posted: 13 May 2011 at 8:50pm | IP Logged Quote Bill Cahill

Are you talking about the original AT 40 LPs that you listened to or one of the radio re-broadcasts? The broadcasts are often "repaired".
Back to Top View Bill Cahill's Profile Search for other posts by Bill Cahill
 
EdisonLite
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 18 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2237
Posted: 14 May 2011 at 8:10am | IP Logged Quote EdisonLite

I've been hearing lots of original broadcasts and rebroadcasts as of late, and I'm not sure which it's from. But even if it was on a re-airing, that still means there's a 3rd (alt) mix out there - which could have been created in 1973 or afterward.

Edited by EdisonLite on 14 May 2011 at 9:21am
Back to Top View EdisonLite's Profile Search for other posts by EdisonLite Visit EdisonLite's Homepage
 
Bill Cahill
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 27 June 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 595
Posted: 14 May 2011 at 5:14pm | IP Logged Quote Bill Cahill

Could the single version been on the original show, but the remastering engineer only had an LP version and inserted it into the show, leaving part of the 45 version near the end to get to Casey's outro? Making it sound like it was a new mix when it reality it's just the LP version and 45 versions spliced together at points? Sometimes they also get the splice wrong when they put these shows back together so did they accidentally repeat something? Also if it is a remastered version, the engineer could have used a Johnny Nash import CD, and who knows what kind of mixes would be on that. Lastly, some labels sent the AT 40 show reel to reel tape dubs of the songs and they could have simply gotten an incorrect dub. Lots of possibilities here.
Back to Top View Bill Cahill's Profile Search for other posts by Bill Cahill
 
EdisonLite
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 18 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2237
Posted: 14 May 2011 at 10:11pm | IP Logged Quote EdisonLite

What I heard on AT40 definitely wasn't an edit of the 45 and LP versions. It was missing lead vocals (only exposing background vocals on "little darling" - near the end of the song). And that's not how it is on the LP or 45 versions. So yes, it's an alternate - whether it's on a tape sent to AT40, a CD from Europe, or some 1973 vinyl pressing - we don't know. That's why I bring it up so people can check their vinyl.
Back to Top View EdisonLite's Profile Search for other posts by EdisonLite Visit EdisonLite's Homepage
 
MMathews
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 18 August 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 978
Posted: 15 May 2011 at 2:23am | IP Logged Quote MMathews

Edison,

I'll send you an mp3 of the version from his CD "The Reggae Collection" .... take a listen and see if it might be what you heard. I just found the mix is different from other cd's.

The database lists "I Can See Clearly" from this CD as an alternate take, but i've suspected it might be a remix with a different drum track added.

So i was curious after reading your post, maybe Stir It Up was different too.
I pulled out Rock Artifacts Vol 2, and The Reggae Collection. These 2 mixes are different.
This version is more like the LP version than the 45 mix, it lacks all the extra vocals and instruments added to the 45 mix, however i'm hearing the placement of instruments is different, the backing vocals, etc. All these things are different on this CD.
Might have to update the db as either "remix" or "neither the 45 or LP version" ... I'm not sure which this would get.
-MM
Back to Top View MMathews's Profile Search for other posts by MMathews
 

Page of 2 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 0.0605 seconds.