Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
Chat Board
 Top 40 Music on Compact Disc : Chat Board
Subject Topic: See Me, Feel Me, The Who question Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
BillCahill
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 13 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 164
Posted: 13 May 2007 at 7:28am | IP Logged Quote BillCahill

My 45 of See Me Feel Me is mixed differently than any CD release. The difference on my 45 is that the drum track is louder. The reason it's louder is it sounds like that either on purpose, or accidentally, someone screwed with the stereo separation to move the drums more toward the center. (Which of course moves the vocal off the center a bit). This does not sound like a multi track remix, either a screw up when mastered at a plant somewhere or on purpose. Let me describe this 45. I see the 45 listed in most publications as 32729, yet this particular 45 is 732729. It is not a typical Decca stock copy, it has a gold label, custom created. This is the same gold 45 custom Tommy label that was used on the 4-7" promotional issue box to radio which contained 8 sides from Tommy on 45 rpm records (I have that too). This is NOT part of that set as the number series is completely different and the liner notes in the box do not mention See Me Feel Me as part of the 8 sides. The B Side of 732729 is Overture From Tommy. This 45 does not say promotional copy on it. Label states a time of 3:22.

Are other copies of this song on a standard Decca label as 32729? If so, does anybody know what this release is and why it's different?

The deadwax is stamped 7 123092 2   
Back to Top View BillCahill's Profile Search for other posts by BillCahill
 
jimct
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 07 April 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3906
Posted: 13 May 2007 at 8:32am | IP Logged Quote jimct

Bill, from the extensive label/catalog research I do for my friends Tim and Gary on the ARSA old music survey website, my experience is that I will, from time to time, come across some Decca 45s that add a "7" prefix to their long-time numbering system. I always took this to imply "7-inch release #32729." You're right, it does read as "732729." But for Decca label discographers, disregarding the "7", when it sometimes appeared, exactly maintained the sequential 45 numbering integrity the label had used, back from the 50s, all the way until the label's last big pop hit, Dobie Gray's "Drift Away", before the Decca label's merger into MCA records in January 1973. As for the custom label for "See Me, Feel Me", all 1970 commercially-issued 45s I have ever seen for it have that gold "custom" label. To me, I just always thought it was the label's way of continuing to market/emphasize the fact that the song was from their "Tommy" LP. Another example of a label doing this would be Elton John's "Someone Saved My Life Tonight", which eschewed using the standard MCA label in the summer of 1975, and instead used a custom label backing which STRONGLY emphasized the LP that it came from, "Captain Fantastic And The Brown Dirt Cowboy." "Someone..." happened to be the only single released from that album, as its flip side, "House Of Cards", was a non-LP track.   
Back to Top View jimct's Profile Search for other posts by jimct
 
TomDiehl1
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 13 January 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 719
Posted: 13 May 2007 at 10:36am | IP Logged Quote TomDiehl1

On Decca releases, the 7 before the rest of the number meant that it was a stereo 45, or at least that's how it had been with every Decca 45 i've found with the 7 before the rest of the number...sometimes the label said stereo, sometimes it didn't mention it at all.

__________________
Live in stereo.
Back to Top View TomDiehl1's Profile Search for other posts by TomDiehl1 Visit TomDiehl1's Homepage
 
BillCahill
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 13 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 164
Posted: 14 May 2007 at 4:22am | IP Logged Quote BillCahill

Then I'd assume the mix difference on my 45 was a mistake made at a record plant or in the dub that went to the plant, because as far as I know, it's supposed to be wide stereo. This one is not.
Back to Top View BillCahill's Profile Search for other posts by BillCahill
 

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login
If you are not already registered you must first register

  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 0.0566 seconds.