Author |
|
aaronk Admin Group
Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 6513
|
Posted: 31 July 2005 at 12:11pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
In my 8th Edition, Pat lists "What It Takes" by Aerosmith as 'neither the 45 or LP version' on the CD Big Ones. If it hasn't been corrected, this comment should be listed as LP version. Even though the song runs (6:28) on Pump and only (5:10) on Big Ones, this is because on Pump there is an instrumental song that was not given its own track.
If you listen to "What It Takes" on Pump, you'll see that the song completely fades out by (5:10), then there's about nine seconds of blank space before the instrumental song comes on.
|
Back to Top |
|
|
Moderator Admin Group
Joined: 10 July 2004 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 446
|
Posted: 01 August 2005 at 6:02am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Aaron my feeling on this is that all other selections on this cd are essentially segued together and with :09 between "What It Takes" and the uncredited instrumental, that is far longer than the industry standard for separating tracks on a cd so I don't feel that it is an uncredited instrumental at all but probably a coda.
Anyone else wish to weigh in on this question?
__________________ Top 40 Music On Compact Disc Moderator
|
Back to Top |
|
|
aaronk Admin Group
Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 6513
|
Posted: 01 August 2005 at 11:10am | IP Logged
|
|
|
I see your point, Pat. I always assumed that this was similar to "Dulcimer Stomp," which is the short instrumental before "The Other Side" on Pump, opening side two of the record. Perhaps your comment in the book, like the way you labeled "The Other Side," could read "LP version without coda" next to Big Ones.
|
Back to Top |
|
|
Todd Ireland MusicFan
Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 4219
|
Posted: 01 August 2005 at 11:21am | IP Logged
|
|
|
I agree with Aaron's suggestion to use an (LP version without coda) comment for the 5:10 version of "What It Takes", especially considering the 10th edition already shows the Pump CD on Geffen 24254 and 069493097 with the comment: (LP version with coda).
|
Back to Top |
|
|
edtop40 MusicFan
Joined: 29 October 2004 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 4996
|
Posted: 01 August 2005 at 6:28pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
what is a "coda"
__________________ edtop40
|
Back to Top |
|
|
Moderator Admin Group
Joined: 10 July 2004 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 446
|
Posted: 01 August 2005 at 7:52pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
I agree, the comment (LP version without the coda" sounds appropriate.
From Webster's dictionary, coda is defined as "a concluding musical section that is formally distinct from the main structure".
__________________ Top 40 Music On Compact Disc Moderator
|
Back to Top |
|
|
Todd Ireland MusicFan
Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 4219
|
Posted: 30 July 2009 at 10:51pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
I have Aerosmith's "What It Takes" on a promo CD single (Geffen PRO-CD-3852) which contains the following tracks and actual run times:
1) CHR Remix/Edit - 4:06 (printed time: 4:06)
2) LP Version - 5:11 (not 6:28 as printed on the CD label)
Can anyone confirm if the "CHR Remix/Edit" is the same as the commercial single version? I don't have a copy of the latter to verify.
Edited by Todd Ireland on 30 July 2009 at 10:55pm
|
Back to Top |
|
|
aaronk Admin Group
Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 6513
|
Posted: 31 July 2009 at 9:10am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Also, is the "CHR Remix/Edit" really remixed, or is it just an edit? I have both versions, but I've never compared the mixes. This is one of those songs that I prefer the album version, because the edits on the single version are very jarring.
|
Back to Top |
|
|
Todd Ireland MusicFan
Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 4219
|
Posted: 15 August 2009 at 5:03am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Commercial cassette single copies of Aerosmith's "What It Takes" has an actual run time of 4:06 and does state "Remix/Edit" on the label. As of this time, I still don't know if it's identical to the "CHR Remix/Edit", but I can at least compare the latter to the LP version and see any actual mix differences can be detected.
Edited by Todd Ireland on 15 August 2009 at 5:03am
|
Back to Top |
|
|
edtop40 MusicFan
Joined: 29 October 2004 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 4996
|
Posted: 15 August 2009 at 2:52pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
todd...do you need an mp3 of the cassingle version to do your own a/b comparison?
__________________ edtop40
|
Back to Top |
|
|
aaronk Admin Group
Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 6513
|
Posted: 15 August 2009 at 3:34pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Todd, I can send you a copy of the CHR Remix/Edit for comparison purposes.
|
Back to Top |
|
|
Todd Ireland MusicFan
Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 4219
|
Posted: 15 August 2009 at 11:32pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
I would indeed welcome a copy to compare. Thanks, guys!
|
Back to Top |
|
|
edtop40 MusicFan
Joined: 29 October 2004 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 4996
|
Posted: 16 August 2009 at 6:04am | IP Logged
|
|
|
my commercial cassingle issued as geffen 19944 states the tracks as below
1-what is takes (remix/edit) (4:06)
2-monkey on my back (lp version) (3:56)
todd...i did some more digging on my end and i can confirm that the "remix/edit" version which is on the cassingle is identical to the "chr remix edit" that is on the promo cd single.....hopefully this one is put to rest....
edtop40
__________________ edtop40
|
Back to Top |
|
|
Todd Ireland MusicFan
Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 4219
|
Posted: 16 August 2009 at 12:04pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Thanks for all your analysis here, Ed. You're a big help!
|
Back to Top |
|
|
chendagam MusicFan
Joined: 27 August 2006 Location: United States
Online Status: Online Posts: 366
|
Posted: 21 July 2015 at 3:42pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
aaronk wrote:
Also, is the "CHR Remix/Edit" really remixed, or is it just an
edit? I have both versions, but I've never compared the mixes. This is one of
those songs that I prefer the album version, because the edits on the single
version are very jarring. |
|
|
Any conformation on this yet?
|
Back to Top |
|
|
aaronk Admin Group
Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 6513
|
Posted: 21 July 2015 at 5:41pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
I just A/B'd the version on Big Ones with the CHR Remix/Edit, and nothing is jumping out at me. I'll have to do a more careful listen when time permits, but if I had to make the call right now, I'd say they are the same mix.
__________________ Aaron Kannowski
Uptown Sound
91.9 The Peak - Classic Hip Hop
|
Back to Top |
|
|
RichM921 MusicFan
Joined: 30 October 2007
Online Status: Offline Posts: 146
|
Posted: 14 February 2020 at 6:19am | IP Logged
|
|
|
I just heard a version of this song on an old Casey Kasem countdown
where it sounds like a completely different vocal take was used. It had
all the typical edit points that I'm used to. Could this be a case of some
copies having a completely remixed version and others just have an
edit of the album version?
|
Back to Top |
|
|