Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
Chat Board
 Top 40 Music on Compact Disc : Chat Board
Subject Topic: Michael (Martin) Murphey - Wildfire Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
crapfromthepast
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 14 September 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2243
Posted: 04 December 2016 at 12:20pm | IP Logged Quote crapfromthepast

Michael not-yet-Martin Murphey had a big pop hit with "Wildfire" in 1975. The song continued the fine 1970s tradition of offing someone in the lyrics (see: "Seasons In The Sun", "Billy Don't Be A Hero", and "Shannon" even if it was a dog...named Snuggles).

LP version (4:46)

You have two choices for the LP version on CD. Both seem to use the same source tapes (but different analog transfers). Both have essentially the same sound quality, which is pretty good.

The first choice is on Columbia/Legacy's Rock Artifacts Vol. 2 (1991). No complaints here; the four Rock Artifacts discs are exquisite in their track selection and sound quality. The same analog transfer is used on:
  • Time-Life's Body Talk Vol. 20 Heart And Soul (1998; digitally exactly 1 dB louder)
  • Realm's 3-CD Ultimate Love Classics Vol. 1 (2000; digitally exactly 1 dB louder until 3:16)
The second choice is on Time-Life's 2-CD Singers And Songwriters Vol. 3 1974-1975 (1999). I know from experience that this Time-Life series is mostly digital clones of other, earlier CDs, so I'd guess that this disc is based on the mastering from Epic's Michael Murphy album Blue Sky/Night Thunder, but can't confirm. The same analog transfer is used on:
  • Time-Life's 2-CD Seventies Music Explosion Vol. 3 Miracles (2005; digitally exactly 1.4 dB louder)
  • Time-Life's 2-CD Classic Soft Rock Vol. 1 Summer Breeze (2006; differently-EQ'd digital clone)
45 version (3:16)

The Wikipedia entry for "Wildfire" states: "The song is rather famous for its piano intro and outro, which is often left off versions of the song edited for radio." Yup. The 45 keeps only the 0:44-4:00 portion of the 4:46 LP version, and fades early.

All the 45 versions on CD come from the mastering from one disc: Rhino's Have A Nice Day Vol. 14 (1990). It sounds like excellent source tapes, great dynamic range, and no noise reduction (as is the case with all the LP-version discs listed above). One major difference, though, is that the Rhino disc gas a remarkably bright EQ, which makes the LP versions sound rather dull in comparison. The same analog transfer is used on:
  • Razor & Tie's 2-CD More Fabulous '70s (1991; differently-EQ'd digital clone)
  • Priority's Seventies Greatest Rock Hits Vol. 3 High Times (1991; too loud and clips a bit)
  • Time-Life's Sounds Of The Seventies Vol. 32 AM Pop Classics (1993)
  • Time-Life's Sounds Of The Seventies Vol. 39 Pop Nuggets Late '70s (1995; differently-EQ'd digital clone)
  • Time-Life's AM Gold Vol. 22 1975 (1996; digitally exactly 0.8 dB quieter)
  • Madacy's Rock On 1975 Midnight Blue (1998; differently-EQ'd digital clone)
  • Reader's Digest's 4-CD American Pie (1998; shortens fade)
My recommendations:

For the LP version, I like Columbia/Legacy's Rock Artifacts Vol. 2 (1991), but I'm biased toward these discs. All the others sound virtually the same as Rock Artifacts Vol. 2.
For the 45 version, I like Rhino's Have A Nice Day Vol. 14 (1990). Here, too, all the others sound virtually the same as Have A Nice Day Vol. 14.

__________________
There's a lot of crap on the radio, but there's only one Crap From The Past.
Back to Top View crapfromthepast's Profile Search for other posts by crapfromthepast Visit crapfromthepast's Homepage
 
crapfromthepast
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 14 September 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2243
Posted: 04 December 2016 at 12:32pm | IP Logged Quote crapfromthepast

Oops - forgot to mention that in the Kenny Rogers tradition of rerecording the hits, there are some non-hit rerecordings of "Wildfire" out there, running 5:05. Avoid.

__________________
There's a lot of crap on the radio, but there's only one Crap From The Past.
Back to Top View crapfromthepast's Profile Search for other posts by crapfromthepast Visit crapfromthepast's Homepage
 
eriejwg
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 10 June 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3511
Posted: 04 December 2016 at 2:13pm | IP Logged Quote eriejwg

My 45 version of choice is to recreate it from Rock
Artifacts 2
. The high end EQ on the existing 45
versions out there has always bothered me.
Back to Top View eriejwg's Profile Search for other posts by eriejwg Visit eriejwg's Homepage
 
KentT
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 25 May 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 650
Posted: 24 December 2016 at 6:55pm | IP Logged Quote KentT

The 45 is bright sounding also, even promo copies.

__________________
I turn up the good and turn down the bad!
Back to Top View KentT's Profile Search for other posts by KentT
 
The Hits Man
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 04 February 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 665
Posted: 25 December 2016 at 10:29pm | IP Logged Quote The Hits Man

Bob Irwin did the initial transfer of the original LP
version from the master tape. They had to bake it, and
were able to get a good pass before the tape
disintegrated. Good for all!

That tape of the 45 was very compressed, so the dynamic
range isn't that good. But, it worked for radio.

__________________
Back to Top View The Hits Man's Profile Search for other posts by The Hits Man
 
AdvprosD
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 12 June 2020
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 354
Posted: 11 August 2020 at 8:51pm | IP Logged Quote AdvprosD

The Hits Man wrote:
Bob Irwin did the initial transfer of the original LP
version from the master tape. They had to bake it, and
were able to get a good pass before the tape
disintegrated. Good for all!

That tape of the 45 was very compressed, so the dynamic
range isn't that good. But, it worked for radio.


I read this a few times and am still confused. What does all this mean? Did they literally "Bake" the master tape? And, if the master disintegrated, how is that good?

Or, am I missing something here that is "Code" for "We don't like the song?" I guess they don't get so saccharin quite like this much but, it's an ok tune in general, imho.

__________________
<Dave> Someone please tell I-Heart Radio that St. Louis is not known as The Loo!
Back to Top View AdvprosD's Profile Search for other posts by AdvprosD
 
aaronk
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Online
Posts: 6515
Posted: 11 August 2020 at 9:50pm | IP Logged Quote aaronk

What you are reading is not code. There are probably others here who
can explain it better, but this is how I understand it. Tape is mostly
plastic but has a glue/adhesive that holds the metal oxide onto it. The
metal oxide is the brown colored material that actually stores the audio
information. Some tapes were made with adhesives that break down
over time due to moisture, so the oxide starts flaking off. Baking the
tape can re-stabilize the adhesive temporarily so that it can be played
again. The “good” comment above is not meant facetiously. It’s literally
good that they were able to get the master tape to play one more time
and transfer it to another source.

__________________
Aaron Kannowski
Uptown Sound
91.9 The Peak - Classic Hip Hop
Back to Top View aaronk's Profile Search for other posts by aaronk Visit aaronk's Homepage
 

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login
If you are not already registered you must first register

  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 0.0540 seconds.