| Author |
|
Bill Cahill
MusicFan
Joined: 27 June 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 595
|
| Posted: 16 November 2010 at 6:18pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
On my DJ copy, the stereo side matches the label time of 2:59, mono side, while stating 2:59 is actually 2:47. It's sped up a little but faded much sooner, which is the reason for the difference.
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
jimct
MusicFan
Joined: 07 April 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3906
|
| Posted: 16 November 2010 at 6:27pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Thanks as always, Bill, for sharing this unique DJ 45 finding with us. I think among the very best parts of this board is that when one of us makes a discovery like this, we don't just keep it to ourselves. We go to the extra time & effort to let others know about it as well, even when we're real busy with other life stuff. I doubt I would've ever known of this earlier DJ 45 mono side fade without your kind post here, Bill. Thanks again!
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Steve Carras
MusicFan
Joined: 29 July 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 177
|
| Posted: 15 April 2016 at 12:00am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Another thing, every mp3 I've ever had of the full length 2-part version has the vocal chorus and instrumental parts interpersing each other, which would naturally be the part two, since the hit part one is largely vocal, pasted on first ahead so that the Part ONE is later, likewise Gary Glitter's "Rock and Roll Parts 1 and 2" (only, of course, part two of Gary's hit was the part two.)
__________________
You know you're really older when you think that younger singer Jesse McCartney's related in anyway to former Beatle Paul McCartney.
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
The Hits Man
MusicFan
Joined: 04 February 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 665
|
| Posted: 21 April 2016 at 9:18am | IP Logged
|
|
|
That mp3 version you have is the extended dance version.
__________________
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Steve Carras
MusicFan
Joined: 29 July 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 177
|
| Posted: 24 April 2016 at 10:38am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Thanks for the information..
__________________
You know you're really older when you think that younger singer Jesse McCartney's related in anyway to former Beatle Paul McCartney.
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Active Topics 
Memberlist 
Search 
Help
Register 
Login
Top 40 Music on Compact Disc : Chat Board
Topic: O’Jays - Love Train
