Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
Chat Board
 Top 40 Music on Compact Disc : Chat Board
Subject Topic: Bobby Brown - On Our Own Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
Gary
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 02 October 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 155
Posted: 27 November 2006 at 7:02pm | IP Logged Quote Gary

On the promo 45 for Bobby Brown's "On Our Own", one side is the commercial 45 version is called with rap. The other side of the promo 45 is a version without rap that clocks in at 4:13. This should be noted in the database.
Back to Top View Gary's Profile Search for other posts by Gary
 
Pat Downey
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 01 October 2003
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1742
Posted: 27 November 2006 at 8:04pm | IP Logged Quote Pat Downey

Gary, the commercial 45 is identical to the dj 45 with the "A" side clearly indicated as the side with rap. You still think the flip side should be noted in the database?
Back to Top View Pat Downey's Profile Search for other posts by Pat Downey
 
Brian W.
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 13 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2507
Posted: 27 November 2006 at 9:48pm | IP Logged Quote Brian W.

Sure, why not? You've noted the DJ-only versions of numerous songs in the database, most recently Fergie's "London Bridge."

Edited by Brian W. on 27 November 2006 at 9:50pm
Back to Top View Brian W.'s Profile Search for other posts by Brian W.
 
edtop40
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 29 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4996
Posted: 27 November 2006 at 10:03pm | IP Logged Quote edtop40

i think that bit of info SHOULD NOT be in the db....for what it's worth...

__________________
edtop40
Back to Top View edtop40's Profile Search for other posts by edtop40
 
Brian W.
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 13 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2507
Posted: 27 November 2006 at 11:16pm | IP Logged Quote Brian W.

edtop40 wrote:
i think that bit of info SHOULD NOT be in the db....for what it's worth...


Why, exactly, Ed?
Back to Top View Brian W.'s Profile Search for other posts by Brian W.
 
aaronk
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Online
Posts: 6513
Posted: 27 November 2006 at 11:22pm | IP Logged Quote aaronk

Why wouldn't you include it, Pat? Almost every DJ 45 you have noted contains information about the flip side or alternate versions.
Back to Top View aaronk's Profile Search for other posts by aaronk Visit aaronk's Homepage
 
Todd Ireland
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 16 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4219
Posted: 27 November 2006 at 11:46pm | IP Logged Quote Todd Ireland

I too am puzzled... I've always thought any DJ edits or versions of Top 40 hits played on pop radio stations were duly noted in the database, regardless of which side they appear on a DJ 45.
Back to Top View Todd Ireland's Profile Search for other posts by Todd Ireland
 
jimct
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 07 April 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3906
Posted: 28 November 2006 at 2:05am | IP Logged Quote jimct

As much as I concern myself with promo-only versions, I do follow Pat's thinking about what may make THIS particular case unusual. It is rare to find 2 distinct mixes of the SAME song on a commercially available 45. In 98% of cases, only ONE mix of a song was available on a stock 45. Chart info shows the "with rap" version to be the hit; therefore, the other side, the "no rap" version, even though it's the same song, could be technically relegated to "non-hit, flip side" status. Almost all unique DJ 45 versions were not commercially available. Since these DJ 45 versions often got radio airplay, and people couldn't buy them in stores, details on them aren't always easy to come by. So, when such a DJ version surfaces on a CD, Pat HAS to provide the DJ copy version background info - it explains to us HOW it is a legitimate and original version, albeit a promo. To me, "On My Own" seems to fall in the same category as Blow Monkeys' "Digging Your Scene", where the U.S. and U.K. mixes appear on both the stock AND promo 45s. Billboard/Whitburn show the U.S. mix as the "hit" side. Therefore, the U.K. mix could be viewed simply as a non-hit flip, just as the no-rap Bobby Brown could be. Pat, my opinion on this: Since the "no rap" On My Own, and the U.K. "Digging Your Scene" flips both DO appear on their promo 45s, radio airplay for EITHER version was possible; both were offered as legitimate, "original release" versions. If the "with rap" On My Own was the ONLY version found on the promo 45, or the U.S. "Digging Your Scene" was the ONLY version found on that promo 45, then to me, excluding those stock 45 "alternate" versions, if I were you, becomes much easier; they weren't presented to radio as a viable airplay option. But they WERE, in both cases. That these mixes ALSO show up on the stock 45, probably ADDS to how highly thought of, and how legitimate the labels considered them to be. But, for the many folks simply confused by my babble, all of this hair-splitting might be "clear as mud", and I can certainly see how many would simply feel that the more version details you provide, the better.

Edited by jimct on 28 November 2006 at 2:08am
Back to Top View jimct's Profile Search for other posts by jimct
 
Gary
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 02 October 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 155
Posted: 28 November 2006 at 3:05am | IP Logged Quote Gary

Pat Downey wrote:
Gary, the commercial 45 is identical to the dj 45 with the "A" side clearly indicated as the side with rap. You still think the flip side should be noted in the database?


Pat I didn't have the commercial 45, only the promo. But I heard a lot of the my area's Top 40/Mainstream stations playing this no rap version when it was a hit. And TM Century only provides the no rap version on their radio Golddiscs. I just feel this should be noted in the database as the no rap version maybe the only one that some people are familiar with. Just my own opinion!
Back to Top View Gary's Profile Search for other posts by Gary
 
aaronk
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Online
Posts: 6513
Posted: 09 December 2006 at 2:17am | IP Logged Quote aaronk

I just listened to my TM Century disc that has the so-called "No Rap" version. Unless the 45 is different, the version on my TM Century disc is merely the LP version faded early. There is, indeed, "rap" at the (2:40) mark, just like the LP version.

Can anyone with the 45 verify if there is or isn't rap starting at (2:40)? I'm wondering if this is a TM Century goof, or if the "no rap" version actually does have rap.
Back to Top View aaronk's Profile Search for other posts by aaronk Visit aaronk's Homepage
 
jimct
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 07 April 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3906
Posted: 09 December 2006 at 4:50am | IP Logged Quote jimct

Since we worked off the promo CD single in 1989, Aaron, I just pulled it to check its contents (CD45-17867)

1-7" Version With Rap (listed time 4:30; actual time 4:29; "too hot to handle" rap starts at (2:53))

2-7" Version Without Rap (listed time 4:15; actual time 4:13; "too hot to handle" rap starts at (2:40))

3-LP Version (listed and actual time 4:53; "too hot to handle" rap starts at (2:41))

If that 2:40-ish "Bobby-Babble" is indeed the "rap" they are referring to (and Bobby's rapping was often indistinguishable from his vocals, I must say), it IS in fact included on all 3 of the versions, making their label wording senseless. But there ARE :15 seconds plus timing differences between each of the three cuts. The "rap start" on cuts 2/3 DOES start a full second later on cut 3, and a full :12-13 seconds later on cut 1. Something else MUST be different with these mixes then, Aaron. If you'd like to try to sort all of this out, I'd be happy to assist by shooting any of these versions out to you; just ask.
Back to Top View jimct's Profile Search for other posts by jimct
 
aaronk
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Online
Posts: 6513
Posted: 09 December 2006 at 1:08pm | IP Logged Quote aaronk

Thanks for checking that out, Jim. Correct me if I'm wrong, but track 1 on your promo CD has a different intro than the other two, right? Isn't that the one which starts off with just beats and then there's the "rap" at the beginning as well as at (2:53)?

Also, would the difference in where the rap starts between tracks 2 and 3 have to do with a delayed start on the third track? One second is pretty close, so perhaps there's just a little extra blank space in front of track 3 (or perhaps that track runs just a hair slower). I haven't done an A/B comparison, but the "no rap" version on my TMC disc sounds exactly like the LP version to my ears.
Back to Top View aaronk's Profile Search for other posts by aaronk Visit aaronk's Homepage
 
abagon
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 01 March 2008
Location: Japan
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 618
Posted: 24 June 2008 at 11:57pm | IP Logged Quote abagon

As the 45 run time info:
The actual 45 running time is (4:27), the listed time is "4:30" on the record label. (MCA 53662)
Back to Top View abagon's Profile Search for other posts by abagon
 
Todd Ireland
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 16 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4219
Posted: 25 June 2008 at 9:49pm | IP Logged Quote Todd Ireland

Pat:

I almost hate to reignite the debate that started this thread over 1-1/2 years ago, but since its been determined that multiple versions of "On Our Own" were played on Top 40 radio, do you agree that Jim's aforementioned promo CD info should be noted in the database?

Also, has anyone picked up the Bobby Brown The Definitive Collection CD on Geffen B0006111? It looks like this collection is comprised almost exclusively of 45 versions of Brown's Top 40 hits. I've strongly considered purchasing this disc for this reason but given that this is a 2006 release, I'm concerned about this CD being mastered with the ultra loud, grossly overcompressed audio levels plaguing so many modern CD releases. Can anybody confirm or deny if the sonics on the Definitive Collection disc suffers from the same fate?
Back to Top View Todd Ireland's Profile Search for other posts by Todd Ireland
 
RichM921
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 30 October 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 146
Posted: 26 June 2008 at 7:42pm | IP Logged Quote RichM921

Don't know if this info helps or not, but I bought this cassette single when it was out. One side was "with rap" and one side was "no rap." The only difference between the two is the intro. On the "with rap" version, it begines with the "Too hot to handle..." line. On the "no rap" version, the first line said by Bobby is "If you want somethin' done, you gotta do it yourself..." Then both versions proceed with the "I think this is gonna be another funky one" line and are identical from that point on.

I recall BOTH versions being played on various stations when this was out, so I don't know if we can call either one the definitive version.
Back to Top View RichM921's Profile Search for other posts by RichM921
 
edtop40
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 29 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4996
Posted: 07 October 2008 at 3:31pm | IP Logged Quote edtop40

my commercial 45 as well as my commercial cassingle have the same catalog number (mca 53662) and contain the same version "on our own (with rap)" with a stated run time on the 45 of 4:30 but actually runs 4:29 on both versions......i found the correct 45 version on the cd

(S) (4:29) MCA 012157598 New Edition - All The Number Ones (45 version)

the cd is super compressed and distorted at normal levels......you need to lower the volume 3 or 4 db's for it to sound right....












__________________
edtop40
Back to Top View edtop40's Profile Search for other posts by edtop40
 
edtop40
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 29 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4996
Posted: 07 October 2008 at 9:56pm | IP Logged Quote edtop40

i also have an import 3" cd single which has the (7" version) listed as the first track running 4:15.....i don't know where this version came from, because it's NOT the version on the 7" vinyl 45.....go figure




ngl

__________________
edtop40
Back to Top View edtop40's Profile Search for other posts by edtop40
 
eriejwg
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 10 June 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3509
Posted: 08 October 2008 at 12:31am | IP Logged Quote eriejwg

Is it possible that track 1 from your import CD, Ed, is the 'rapless' edit that is on Jim's promo CD?
Back to Top View eriejwg's Profile Search for other posts by eriejwg Visit eriejwg's Homepage
 
80smusicfreak
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 14 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 527
Posted: 08 October 2008 at 8:26am | IP Logged Quote 80smusicfreak

I like how MCA changed the song title on the insert from your import 3" CD single, ed - although I see they managed to get it right on the disc itself, lol...
Back to Top View 80smusicfreak's Profile Search for other posts by 80smusicfreak
 
edtop40
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 29 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4996
Posted: 08 October 2008 at 10:06am | IP Logged Quote edtop40

you know.....i think i have 2 different 3" cd singles.....and i used one for the cd itself and the other for the sleeve......because the cd itself says germany and the sleeve says france......i gotta check when i get home tonite......i didn't even realize the typo on the france sleeve...

__________________
edtop40
Back to Top View edtop40's Profile Search for other posts by edtop40
 

Page of 2 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 0.0760 seconds.