Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
Chat Board
 Top 40 Music on Compact Disc : Chat Board
Subject Topic: buckner & garcia "pac-man fever" Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
aaronk
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6513
Posted: 18 August 2010 at 9:44pm | IP Logged Quote aaronk

There wasn't a commercial single for "All My Love," was there? If that's true, I can certainly understand why it was a radio-only hit. And obviously when you get into the '90s, there will be countless examples of high charting Billboard Hot 100 songs that didn't get any CHR airplay. For the '70s and '80s, though, the R&R CHR airplay charts are very similar to the Hot 100, with the exception of the above examples.
Back to Top View aaronk's Profile Search for other posts by aaronk Visit aaronk's Homepage
 
JMD1961
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 29 March 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 185
Posted: 19 August 2010 at 2:27am | IP Logged Quote JMD1961

They were indeed close. I'm in the middle of doing a week-by-week comparison between BB, CB & R&R (the goal is to produce my own year-end charts combining info from all three). What stands out to me (especially in the '70s) is that R&B seemed to perform less well on the R&R charts than the other two. My guess is that, while big sellers, R&B didn't get a lot of airplay on "pop" stations.
Back to Top View JMD1961's Profile Search for other posts by JMD1961
 
mstgator
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 06 September 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 98
Posted: 19 August 2010 at 6:08pm | IP Logged Quote mstgator

You'll also note that during a period in 1981-83, many songs spent what seemed eternity holding at their peak position on the Hot 100, and ended up climbing much higher in R&R. A few examples include Chicago's "Love Me Tomorrow" (#21 vs #4), Kenny Loggins' "Heart To Heart" (#15 vs #3), Billy Joel's "Allentown" (#17 vs #3), and Fleetwood Mac's "Gypsy" (#12 vs #1).

Edited by mstgator on 19 August 2010 at 6:09pm
Back to Top View mstgator's Profile Search for other posts by mstgator
 
aaronk
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6513
Posted: 19 August 2010 at 8:26pm | IP Logged Quote aaronk

Interesting thread! Here are some other early '80s songs that have a much higher airplay peak:

"September Morn" - Neil Diamond (#6 RR; #17 BB)
"Jojo" - Boz Scaggs (#6 RR; #17 BB)
"Boulevard" - Jackson Browne (#4 RR; #19 BB)
"Hot Rod Hearts" - Robbie Dupree (#3 RR; #15 BB)
"Never Be The Same" - Christopher Cross (#3 RR; #15 BB)
"A Little In Love" - Cliff Richard (#5 RR; #17 BB)


Edited by aaronk on 19 August 2010 at 9:28pm
Back to Top View aaronk's Profile Search for other posts by aaronk Visit aaronk's Homepage
 
torcan
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 23 June 2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 269
Posted: 20 August 2010 at 3:38pm | IP Logged Quote torcan

mstgator wrote:
You'll also note that during a period in 1981-83, many songs spent what seemed eternity holding at their peak position on the Hot 100, and ended up climbing much higher in R&R. A few examples include Chicago's "Love Me Tomorrow" (#21 vs #4), Kenny Loggins' "Heart To Heart" (#15 vs #3), Billy Joel's "Allentown" (#17 vs #3), and Fleetwood Mac's "Gypsy" (#12 vs #1).


This period has always fascinated me. From about 1975-1983, Billboard had a rule that if a song (or album) had a "star" (or bullet) on the chart one week, it could not fall the next. It first had to hold in that position, and "lose its star". In the fall of 1980, they introduced "superstars" to their chart mix for the songs that were the fastest rising. After a while, just about everything that moved up within the top 40 received a superstar, and for most songs they first had to hold, convert the superstar to a star, then hold again and lose the star. This meant three or more weeks in peak postions for many songs during this period. After holding for three or more weeks, they'd tumble down the chart quickly - I guess to make up for the inflated positions while they were waiting to lose the star.

Looking back, I find these rules a bit rediculous. It's almost like the chart director didn't want to move a song out of a possible peak position if it had been holding there a few weeks, whether the song would have rightfully moved up or not.

I know that Billboard was always considered the most accurate charts - but you wonder how accurate they really were during this period!
Back to Top View torcan's Profile Search for other posts by torcan
 
Paul Haney
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 01 April 2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1742
Posted: 21 August 2010 at 6:27am | IP Logged Quote Paul Haney

Here's a few more to add to the list:

I.G.Y. - Donald Fagen (#6 RR/#26 BB)
The One You Love - Glenn Frey (#2 RR/#15 BB)
All Those Lies - Glenn Frey (#20 RR/#41 BB)
I Gotta Try - Michael McDonald (#17 RR/#44 BB)
Take The Short Way Home - Dionne Warwick (#17 RR/#41 BB)

I also like R&R for those songs that were ineligble for BB (like "All My Love" mentioned above):

More Than A Woman - Bee Gees (#21 RR)
Tell Me I'm Not Dreaming - Jermaine Jackson (#6 RR)
Pinball Wizard - Elton John (#9 RR)
Into The Groove - Madonna (#6 RR)

And, yes, most R&B songs ranked lower in R&R because they didn't get as much airplay on the CHR stations (especially in the 1970s and early 1980s).

Also, mstgator, "Love Me Tomorrow" by Chicago peaked at #22 on BB, not #21:)
Back to Top View Paul Haney's Profile Search for other posts by Paul Haney
 
mstgator
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 06 September 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 98
Posted: 21 August 2010 at 7:00am | IP Logged Quote mstgator

Heh, that's what I get for going by memory instead of checking my books... :)

One more that was one of my favorites of 1983: Mac McAnally's "Minimum Love" (#25 RR/#41 BB). I didn't have access to AT40 at the time, only Dick Clark's National Music Survey (which had switched from Cashbox to RR by '83), so many of these songs were bigger hits in my mind than the Hot 100 charts would bear out.

Edited by mstgator on 21 August 2010 at 7:02am
Back to Top View mstgator's Profile Search for other posts by mstgator
 
RichM921
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 30 October 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 146
Posted: 21 August 2010 at 2:31pm | IP Logged Quote RichM921

mstgator wrote:
You'll also note that during a period in 1981-83, many songs spent what seemed eternity holding at their peak position on the Hot 100, and ended up climbing much higher in R&R. A few examples include Chicago's "Love Me Tomorrow" (#21 vs #4), Kenny Loggins' "Heart To Heart" (#15 vs #3), Billy Joel's "Allentown" (#17 vs #3), and Fleetwood Mac's "Gypsy" (#12 vs #1).


There's no doubt in my mind that those songs should have been Top 5 hits in BB too. This makes me wonder if indeed the R&R charts were more accurate. Most of the songs you all are mentioning are ones I remember getting a ton of play on Top 40 radio, especially the ones that peaked top 20 or 30 in BB and went Top 10 in R&R.
Back to Top View RichM921's Profile Search for other posts by RichM921
 
AndrewChouffi
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 24 September 2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1091
Posted: 22 August 2010 at 11:02am | IP Logged Quote AndrewChouffi

To Rich:

I am not going to dispute your opinion that the R&R charts reflected airplay more accurately than Billboard, but I have my own opinion to add...

I believe that R&R at that time was best at being a barometer of what was being PROMOTED best on the radio (it was easier to work up the charts a safe all-dayparts record as opposed to a killer, "heavier" nighttime record that had a ton of public interest & sold a lot of singles and parent albums).

Also, the Billboard Hot 100 was never meant to be a chart to specifically represent only airplay as the sales component of the chart was equally as important, if not MORE important near the top fifteen of the chart.

This may be why (for example) "Allentown" got only to #17 on the Billboard chart: It received airplay in all dayparts; people that liked it already purchased the album (it was the 2nd single), yet not many people really LOVED the song (it was good, but it wasn't incredible).

The same could be said for the other three examples in mstgator's post; they were all 2nd singles from reasonably hot acts, they could be played in all dayparts, the songs were all good (but not the acts' all-time best).

Andy
Back to Top View AndrewChouffi's Profile Search for other posts by AndrewChouffi
 
aaronk
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6513
Posted: 22 August 2010 at 11:36am | IP Logged Quote aaronk

AndrewChouffi wrote:
This may be why (for example) "Allentown" got only to #17 on the Billboard chart: It received airplay in all dayparts; people that liked it already purchased the album (it was the 2nd single)...

Your point about people already owning the album is a possible explanation as to why some songs didn't peak higher on the Hot 100 chart. Why buy the single if I already have it on an album?
Back to Top View aaronk's Profile Search for other posts by aaronk Visit aaronk's Homepage
 
aaronk
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6513
Posted: 22 August 2010 at 12:19pm | IP Logged Quote aaronk

RichM921 wrote:
This makes me wonder if indeed the R&R charts were more accurate.

Neither chart is going to be a perfectly accurate representation of a song's popularity. Consider the following hypothetical reasons chart positions could be affected:

R&R

  • Payola

  • Pushy record promoters

  • Dayparting rules on "edgy" songs

  • People don't request songs they have already purchased



Hot 100

  • "Bought" chart positions

  • No need to buy a song that's on the radio all the time

  • Purchased the whole album instead of the single

  • Recorded it off the radio instead of buying


I'm sure there many more possible reasons why a song's chart position might not be completely accurate. Because of this, I tend to look at both R&R and Hot 100 charts, taking each with a grain of salt.

Edited by aaronk on 22 August 2010 at 2:00pm
Back to Top View aaronk's Profile Search for other posts by aaronk Visit aaronk's Homepage
 
JMD1961
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 29 March 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 185
Posted: 22 August 2010 at 3:27pm | IP Logged Quote JMD1961

aaronk wrote:

I'm sure there many more possible reasons why a song's chart position might not be completely accurate. Because of this, I tend to look at both R&R and Hot 100 charts, taking each with a grain of salt.


I agree, Aaron. That's why I'm currently doing my year-end charts from 1974-1989 (the time I consider "My Era") using Billboard, R&R and the even more questionable CashBox charts. By combining the three, I'm hoping I get a better representation of the music of each year.
Back to Top View JMD1961's Profile Search for other posts by JMD1961
 
torcan
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 23 June 2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 269
Posted: 23 August 2010 at 9:42am | IP Logged Quote torcan

aaronk wrote:
[QUOTE=AndrewChouffi]
Your point about people already owning the album is a possible explanation as to why some songs didn't peak higher on the Hot 100 chart. Why buy the single if I already have it on an album?


That is a good point but I don't think it holds water. After "Thriller" hit big and releasing lots of singles from albums became commonplace, quite frequently those later singles (5th, 6th, etc.) still became big top 10 hits, and some of them No. 1 - so even though many people had those albums others were still buying the singles. Theoretically, that should have applied to all those 2nd single examples in the early '80s too.
Back to Top View torcan's Profile Search for other posts by torcan
 
aaronk
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6513
Posted: 23 August 2010 at 2:14pm | IP Logged Quote aaronk

torcan wrote:
That is a good point but I don't think it holds water.

Which is why I was careful to say "possible explanation" and "some songs." You can't really say that it's not possible just because it doesn't apply to Thriller, though. That was a blockbuster album not even in the same league as albums like The Nylon Curtain (Billy Joel) or Mirage (Fleetwood Mac). I still think it's possible that album sales can cause single sales to be lower. It might not be the only reason, but it's still possible.

Edited by aaronk on 23 August 2010 at 2:15pm
Back to Top View aaronk's Profile Search for other posts by aaronk Visit aaronk's Homepage
 
Hykker
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 30 October 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1386
Posted: 23 August 2010 at 3:22pm | IP Logged Quote Hykker

aaronk wrote:
RichM921 wrote:
This makes me wonder if indeed the R&R charts were more accurate.

Neither chart is going to be a perfectly accurate representation of a song's popularity. Consider the following hypothetical reasons chart positions could be affected:


Here's another factor that could affect chart position/longevity:
Smaller market stations (such as the ones where I've worked) don't have the resources to do music testing per se, so we've tended to follow the trades as to what to add, drop or put in various rotations. The 2 CHRs that I worked at during the 80s & 90s were also trade reporters so our reports (and presumably other stations in a similar situation) tended to "keep the momentum going" on songs. Neither of the aforementioned stations were Billboard reporters, but we did report to R&R (which tended to have somewhat looser standards to accept stations as reporters than BB did, also BB seemed to keep a lot of "heritage" stations as CHR reporters well into the 80s, even though those stations may have transitioned to more of an AC format).

In short, R&R's reporting base was somewhat broader, and encompassed more medium to small markets than BB's did which would also skew the results.
Back to Top View Hykker's Profile Search for other posts by Hykker
 
AndrewChouffi
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 24 September 2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1091
Posted: 23 August 2010 at 7:22pm | IP Logged Quote AndrewChouffi

To add to the 'torcan'/'aaronk' discussion: I was only talking about the cited songs that were 2nd singles; they were all medium-good songs. The second single from "Thriller", for example, was "Billie Jean". An OUTSTANDING song. The norm changes when the quality, and public impact is immense.

Andy

Back to Top View AndrewChouffi's Profile Search for other posts by AndrewChouffi
 
KentT
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 25 May 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 650
Posted: 25 August 2010 at 3:31pm | IP Logged Quote KentT

Another biggie you miss. In 1977, Stevie Wonder's "Isn't She Lovely" got a lot of airplay as an album track. Usually the crying baby intro was edited off. Wondered about that one not being a single when it was an obvious hit. Asked the Motown rep when he dropped in for a visit. Later found out Stevie Wonder wouldn't allow an edited 45 to be released.

__________________
I turn up the good and turn down the bad!
Back to Top View KentT's Profile Search for other posts by KentT
 
RichM921
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 30 October 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 146
Posted: 25 August 2010 at 7:27pm | IP Logged Quote RichM921

KentT wrote:
Another biggie you miss. In 1977, Stevie Wonder's "Isn't She Lovely" got a lot of airplay as an album track. Usually the crying baby intro was edited off. Wondered about that one not being a single when it was an obvious hit. Asked the Motown rep when he dropped in for a visit. Later found out Stevie Wonder wouldn't allow an edited 45 to be released.


Wasn't there a promo 45? I know there's edit floating around.
Back to Top View RichM921's Profile Search for other posts by RichM921
 
Bill Cahill
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 27 June 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 595
Posted: 26 August 2010 at 5:48am | IP Logged Quote Bill Cahill

I don't have time to move this great discussion to another thread, can somebody else move it? Anyway I think that Isn't She Lovely was covered in another thread. I believe there was no edit from the label, but TM Century Gold Disc made one which cuts off the baby intro and chops off the lengthy ending. TM Century has many of their own edits, including an odd edit of Roundabout by Yes. Lots of stations used TM Century CDs in the 80's and 90's which made the TM Century edit commonly used on AC stations, and it still is.
Back to Top View Bill Cahill's Profile Search for other posts by Bill Cahill
 
Paul Haney
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 01 April 2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1742
Posted: 26 August 2010 at 9:45am | IP Logged Quote Paul Haney

Bill Cahill wrote:
Anyway I think that Isn't She Lovely was covered in another thread.


I know this topic has been covered before...I'll see if I can find it and bump it up for those interested.
Back to Top View Paul Haney's Profile Search for other posts by Paul Haney
 

<< Prev Page of 3 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 0.0547 seconds.