Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
Chat Board
 Top 40 Music on Compact Disc : Chat Board
Subject Topic: Pono Music is up and running Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
Fetta
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 26 April 2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 389
Posted: 25 February 2015 at 8:54am | IP Logged Quote Fetta

When DJing at at club on a large sound system, I can hear a difference between MP3's vs. CD. To my ears MP3s never sounded quite the same in a really large club setting.      However, on a home system or in the car, or on an ipod, I can't tell the difference at all.

Curious if any other club or mobile DJs feel the same.
Back to Top View Fetta's Profile Search for other posts by Fetta
 
crapfromthepast
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 14 September 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2240
Posted: 25 February 2015 at 12:00pm | IP Logged Quote crapfromthepast

You can easily tell the difference between mp3 and wav for bitrates of 192 kbps and lower. The midrange and high frequencies will have an upleasant "whooshing" characteristic from the encoding - most noticeable on the cymbals.

I can hear the difference between 256 kbps mp3 and wav, but only on fairly high-end equipment, like my mobile DJ gear. The artifacts at 256 kbps are small, but they're still there.

At 320 kbps, I can't really tell the difference between mp3 and wav. I did some informal tests, with the same song encoded as a lossless flac file, and as a 320 kbps mp3. I couldn't tell the difference in an A/B comparison. Maybe I could have differentiated the two on a really high-end system, but I don't have a really high-end system.

A few years ago, when I moved my mobile DJ and radio work onto the laptop/USB-sound-card, I initially encoded everything as flac. My DJ software could search and play the flac files just fine, but it didn't display the ID3 tags very well. And then I ran out of space on the laptop's hard drive. (Crap From The Past has a much larger library than any normal person/show should need.)

So I re-encoded everything to 320 kpbs mp3 and replaced all the flac files on the laptop. I fit more songs fit on the hard drive, with better compatibility with my DJ software, and no real noticeable change in sound quality. My radio station streams at 256 kbps (which is great for a radio station), so you wouldn't hear a difference between a flac and a 320 kbps mp3 song anyway.

My advice, if you haven't heard it already from everyone else:

Rip your CDs to flac.
Make sure your tags are complete, consistent and correct.
Make multiple copies of your library on separate hard drives. If possible, trade hard drives with people, so you can recover your stuff in the event that something bad happens.

__________________
There's a lot of crap on the radio, but there's only one Crap From The Past.
Back to Top View crapfromthepast's Profile Search for other posts by crapfromthepast Visit crapfromthepast's Homepage
 
The Hits Man
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 04 February 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 665
Posted: 28 February 2015 at 1:38am | IP Logged Quote The Hits Man

I do not have a "high-end" system, but can hear the
difference between a 320kbps mp3 files and the original
non-data compressed file. No, I don't have super
hearing, I just know what to listen for.

__________________
Back to Top View The Hits Man's Profile Search for other posts by The Hits Man
 
NightAire
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 20 February 2010
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 998
Posted: 28 February 2015 at 4:16pm | IP Logged Quote NightAire

I notice Pono and 7Digital offering albums currently
available on CD (16 bit / 44.1 Khz). For example, you
could buy Bruce Springsteen's Greatest Hits, and you
could buy Bruce Springsteen's "Tunnel of Love" album.

Typically in these situations I would go for the original
album because the collections tend to be more heavily
compressed and / or clipped.

Has anybody checked to see if the albums on these sites
are as compressed / clipped as the CD versions, or if in
remastering them for the websites, they left off the
clipping?

Also, if you have a digital master at 16 bit / 44.1 Khz,
how can you then release a file of it at 24 bit / 96 Khz?
I haven't found a specific example yet, but I could
imagine it happening. Janet Jackson's "Control" album
was DDD, wasn't it? There's no way to create a higher
rez master, I assume...

__________________
Gene Savage
http://www.BlackLightRadio.com
http://www.facebook.com/TulsaSavage
Owasso, Oklahoma USA
Back to Top View NightAire's Profile Search for other posts by NightAire Visit NightAire's Homepage
 
The Hits Man
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 04 February 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 665
Posted: 03 March 2015 at 3:36pm | IP Logged Quote The Hits Man

NightAire wrote:
I notice Pono and 7Digital offering
albums currently
available on CD (16 bit / 44.1 Khz). For example, you
could buy Bruce Springsteen's Greatest Hits, and you
could buy Bruce Springsteen's "Tunnel of Love" album.

Typically in these situations I would go for the
original
album because the collections tend to be more heavily
compressed and / or clipped.


In this case, you can rest easy. The new Bruce
Springsteen remasters up to "Born In The U.S.A. are not
compressed at all.

Quote:
Janet Jackson's "Control" album
was DDD, wasn't it?


Nope. It's an analog recording (AAD) all the way. her
producers Jimmy Jam/Terry Lewis were analog guys.

__________________
Back to Top View The Hits Man's Profile Search for other posts by The Hits Man
 
NightAire
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 20 February 2010
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 998
Posted: 04 March 2015 at 7:39pm | IP Logged Quote NightAire

Quote:

Quote:
Janet Jackson's "Control" album
was DDD, wasn't it?


Nope. It's an analog recording (AAD) all the way. her
producers Jimmy Jam/Terry Lewis were analog guys.


What a bizarre mis-remembering on my part, but I see in
Discogs on the CD label, "AAD."

Let's take a different example then: Billy Joel's "Nylon
Curtain" or George Michael's "Faith."

All you've got is all you're going to get with those...
no?

(I couldn't figure out why they "remastered" Faith
recently, other than maybe to make it a louder disc. The
bonuses looked nice, though.)

__________________
Gene Savage
http://www.BlackLightRadio.com
http://www.facebook.com/TulsaSavage
Owasso, Oklahoma USA
Back to Top View NightAire's Profile Search for other posts by NightAire Visit NightAire's Homepage
 
aaronk
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6513
Posted: 04 March 2015 at 7:55pm | IP Logged Quote aaronk

I bought the Faith remaster, because I didn't actually own the full album on CD (surprisingly). The bonus tracks are definitely nice. I haven't analyzed it in an editor to see if the tracks are brickwalled, but I would imagine they are.

To address your question about DDD, it would depend on the resolution used during the recording process. I'm not sure about the technology at that time, but I wouldn't automatically assume that all digital recordings were at 44.1 kHz, 16 bit. Quite possibly they used digital recorders with higher bit depths and sampling rates than a standard audio CD.

__________________
Aaron Kannowski
Uptown Sound
91.9 The Peak - Classic Hip Hop
Back to Top View aaronk's Profile Search for other posts by aaronk Visit aaronk's Homepage
 
aaronk
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6513
Posted: 04 March 2015 at 8:42pm | IP Logged Quote aaronk

aaronk wrote:
I bought the Faith remaster, because I didn't actually own the full album on CD (surprisingly). The bonus tracks are definitely nice. I haven't analyzed it in an editor to see if the tracks are brickwalled, but I would imagine they are.

I just ripped it to my hard drive, and I'm pleasantly surprised to see that the dynamic range is quite nice. There doesn't appear to be any brickwalled audio on this release.

__________________
Aaron Kannowski
Uptown Sound
91.9 The Peak - Classic Hip Hop
Back to Top View aaronk's Profile Search for other posts by aaronk Visit aaronk's Homepage
 
Brian W.
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 13 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2507
Posted: 05 March 2015 at 2:37am | IP Logged Quote Brian W.

aaronk wrote:
I bought the Faith remaster,
because I didn't actually own the full album on CD
(surprisingly). I wouldn't automatically assume that
all
digital recordings were at 44.1 kHz, 16 bit. Quite
possibly they used digital recorders with higher bit
depths and sampling rates than a standard audio CD.


Or lower... Madonna's "Like a Virgin" album is DDD,
but the liner notes state that it was recorded at 44.1
kHZ, 12 bit. That's right, 12 bit. Unless it's a
typo.



Edited by Brian W. on 05 March 2015 at 2:37am
Back to Top View Brian W.'s Profile Search for other posts by Brian W.
 

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login
If you are not already registered you must first register

<< Prev Page of 2
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 0.0547 seconds.