Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
Chat Board
 Top 40 Music on Compact Disc : Chat Board
Subject Topic: garfunkel all i know Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
edtop40
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 29 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4996
Posted: 20 May 2011 at 10:43am | IP Logged Quote edtop40

my commercial 45 for the garfunkel song "all i know" issued as columbia 45926 states the run time as 3:48 and does indeed run that length....the db states the 45 runs 3:43 which by my findings is inaccurate....the vinyl 45 is identical to the version on the cd below which i own...

(S) (3:47) Columbia 45008 Garfunkel   

__________________
edtop40
Back to Top View edtop40's Profile Search for other posts by edtop40
 
KentT
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 25 May 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 650
Posted: 21 May 2011 at 6:50pm | IP Logged Quote KentT

Another thing to add and know. The promo single had a SQ Quad mix available on the first promo pressing run. The mix didn't fold well to mono and there was later a mono/stereo promo reserviced to radio.

__________________
I turn up the good and turn down the bad!
Back to Top View KentT's Profile Search for other posts by KentT
 
Yah Shure
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 11 December 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1317
Posted: 22 May 2011 at 12:28pm | IP Logged Quote Yah Shure

KentT wrote:
The promo single had a SQ Quad mix available on the first promo pressing run. The mix didn't fold well to mono and there was later a mono/stereo promo reserviced to radio.


The stereo/longer mono regular DJ 45 was released at the same time as the SQ quad DJ 45, as was mentioned in the promo note which was stapled onto the 45's sleeve. We actually received the regular DJ 45 first, thereby saving this copy from a less-kind fate. :)

Edited by Yah Shure on 22 May 2011 at 12:29pm
Back to Top View Yah Shure's Profile Search for other posts by Yah Shure
 
KentT
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 25 May 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 650
Posted: 23 May 2011 at 9:11am | IP Logged Quote KentT

Thanks for posting that note. Neat bit of history.

__________________
I turn up the good and turn down the bad!
Back to Top View KentT's Profile Search for other posts by KentT
 
Todd Ireland
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 16 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4219
Posted: 21 May 2013 at 7:58pm | IP Logged Quote Todd Ireland

According to notes I have from Jim, his commercial 45 copy of Garfunkel's "All I Know", which is in stereo, has an actual run time of 3:46 just like on the stereo side of the promo 45 (both have a printed time of 3:48). Ed, when you have a chance, could you please double-check your 45 run time to verify if your pressing does indeed differ by a couple of seconds?
Back to Top View Todd Ireland's Profile Search for other posts by Todd Ireland
 
jimct
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 07 April 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3906
Posted: 21 May 2013 at 8:41pm | IP Logged Quote jimct

Although it is already noted in Pat's db, the following fact has not yet been
mentioned in this thread. The mono side of my promo 45 features a different
instrumental ending than either the stereo side of the promo 45/my
commercial 45/the LP version does. To my knowledge, the mono promo 45
is the only source for this unique ending.

Edited by jimct on 21 May 2013 at 8:42pm
Back to Top View jimct's Profile Search for other posts by jimct
 
Bill Cahill
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 27 June 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 595
Posted: 22 May 2013 at 3:48am | IP Logged Quote Bill Cahill

The DJ mono ending does not feature the cross fade from orchestra to piano. Instead it keeps going to a point where the orchestra ends and the piano starts. I don't know if the cross fade was created to shorten the ending or for made for artistic reasons. It also sounds like a dedicated mono mix. Maybe they mixed the mono first and then decided to do the cross fade, and forgot to go back and change the ending for the mono version. Or didn't bother. The cross fade version ended up on the stereo 45, the album, and the quad.
Back to Top View Bill Cahill's Profile Search for other posts by Bill Cahill
 
EdisonLite
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 18 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2237
Posted: 22 May 2013 at 8:36am | IP Logged Quote EdisonLite

I always thought records that did this kind of crossfade ending/coda were genius. I loved it on "All I Know" and also on "Could It Be Magic". (Can anyone think of any other top 40 hits that did this?)

Then, of course, there were records like the album version of "Love Me Tomorrow" where the song faded but the orchestra kept going. I believe Chicago did this more than once. (Maybe "Will You Still Love Me" album version?)

I'm not referring to songs that fade into other songs (like the ending of Chicago's "Hard to Say I'm Sorry"). But true crossfade ending I think are really nice.
Back to Top View EdisonLite's Profile Search for other posts by EdisonLite Visit EdisonLite's Homepage
 
AndrewChouffi
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 24 September 2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1092
Posted: 22 May 2013 at 9:00am | IP Logged Quote AndrewChouffi

To EdisonLite:

While I agree that some crossfaded endings are near-genius, have you heard the original [mono promo] 45 of "All I Know"?

That is perfection.

The crossfaded [stereo] "All I Know" is not on measure, or on beat, where the original [mono promo] is both (and allows for a much stronger resolve).

Andy
Back to Top View AndrewChouffi's Profile Search for other posts by AndrewChouffi
 
EdisonLite
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 18 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2237
Posted: 22 May 2013 at 9:46am | IP Logged Quote EdisonLite

I do have the mono promo 45, which I bought just to have the unique ending. I'll have to re-listen. The stereo version may not have been perfect on the beat, but I thought it was artfully done and never felt wrong or off to me.
Back to Top View EdisonLite's Profile Search for other posts by EdisonLite Visit EdisonLite's Homepage
 
edtop40
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 29 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4996
Posted: 22 May 2013 at 7:37pm | IP Logged Quote edtop40

paul...i just re-timed my 45 and it runs 3:47 not 3:48 as
previously noted.......it could be 3:48 because the fade
out is long and faint....and my vinyl 45 isn't in the best
of shape...

__________________
edtop40
Back to Top View edtop40's Profile Search for other posts by edtop40
 
Todd Ireland
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 16 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4219
Posted: 25 May 2013 at 10:17pm | IP Logged Quote Todd Ireland

Thanks, Ed.


EdisonLite wrote:
I always thought records that did this kind of crossfade ending/coda were genius. I loved it on "All I Know" and also on "Could It Be Magic". (Can anyone think of any other top 40 hits that did this?)

Then, of course, there were records like the album version of "Love Me Tomorrow" where the song faded but the orchestra kept going. I believe Chicago did this more than once. (Maybe "Will You Still Love Me" album version?)

I'm not referring to songs that fade into other songs (like the ending of Chicago's "Hard to Say I'm Sorry"). But true crossfade ending I think are really nice.


Other than the examples you cited, Gordon, the only other Top 40 single containing a crossfade ending/coda that immediately comes to mind is Faith No More's "Epic" (the ending dramatically transitions from a "rap chant" and a crescendo of wailing guitars to a somewhat unsettling piano solo).
Back to Top View Todd Ireland's Profile Search for other posts by Todd Ireland
 
MMathews
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 18 August 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 978
Posted: 26 May 2013 at 1:29am | IP Logged Quote MMathews

....during which the fish flops in the video. I can't
think of the ending of "Epic" without the flopping fish...
Back to Top View MMathews's Profile Search for other posts by MMathews
 
crapfromthepast
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 14 September 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2243
Posted: 13 August 2017 at 7:52pm | IP Logged Quote crapfromthepast

Three points here:

(1) I got to hear the mono promo 45 version, and agree that the ending is far better here than on the commercially-released versions.

(2) I got to hear the version from Columbia's Garfunkel CD from 1988, and found it preferable to all the versions I have on compilations for two reasons. First, the fade on Garfunkel extends for about five seconds longer than any other disc. Second, all the compilation disc versions are digital clones of Time-Life's Superhits Vol. 13 1973 and AM Gold Vol. 3 1973 (both 1992; AM Gold was later repackaged as Superhits), which has its left and right channels swapped. Specifically, the following discs are digital clones of Superhits:
  • Time-Life's 2-CD Body Talk Vol. 9 Magic Moments (1996) - differently-EQ'd digital clone
  • Time-Life's Body Talk The Language Of Love (1998) - digitally identical to Body Talk Vol. 9 Magic Moments
  • Time-Life's 2-CD Singers And Songwriters Vol. 1 1972-1973 (2000) - digitally identical to Superhits
  • Time-Life's Ultimate Love Songs Collection Almost Paradise (2004) - digitally identical to Body Talk
(3) Spacehog's "In The Meantime" (1996) fades from a loud guitar part to a mellow piano ending. One of my favorite mid-'90s pop songs.

__________________
There's a lot of crap on the radio, but there's only one Crap From The Past.
Back to Top View crapfromthepast's Profile Search for other posts by crapfromthepast Visit crapfromthepast's Homepage
 
eriejwg
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 10 June 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3509
Posted: 14 August 2017 at 12:22pm | IP Logged Quote eriejwg

Does the longer fade from the 1988 Garfunkel CD
match the mono promo, but in stereo?
Back to Top View eriejwg's Profile Search for other posts by eriejwg Visit eriejwg's Homepage
 
eriejwg
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 10 June 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3509
Posted: 14 August 2017 at 12:24pm | IP Logged Quote eriejwg

The reason I ask is that my copy, in stereo, runs 3:55
and does not sound like a crossfade.

Could someone send me a clean dub of the mono promo so I
could compare?
Back to Top View eriejwg's Profile Search for other posts by eriejwg Visit eriejwg's Homepage
 
eriejwg
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 10 June 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3509
Posted: 14 August 2017 at 3:16pm | IP Logged Quote eriejwg

John, (Yah Shure), was kind enough to send me a copy of
his mono DJ 45. My stereo version matches the ending of
the 3:55 DJ 45.

What is the source of this longer 3:55 stereo version?
Back to Top View eriejwg's Profile Search for other posts by eriejwg Visit eriejwg's Homepage
 
crapfromthepast
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 14 September 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2243
Posted: 14 August 2017 at 7:36pm | IP Logged Quote crapfromthepast

Good question!

Discogs can help a little bit. Here are the matrix numbers for the 45s in question:

157752 - mono promo 45 version of "All I Know", printed 3:48, actual 3:55
157753 - stereo version of "All I Know", printed 3:48, actual 3:46; appears on promo 45 and commercial 45; this is the version that's available on CD
157754 - stereo version of "Mary Was An Only Child", printed 3:39; appears as B-side of commercial 45; unsure what's actually on the B-side of the SD/QUAD promo 45
157755 - listed on promo 45 of "All I Know" as "SQ*/QUAD", where the asterisk says that is fully compatible and may be played on conventional stereo equipment, printed 3:48, actual ?

Anyone have any more details to fill in?

By the way, the stereo mix of "All I Know" fades the orchestral part starting around 3:13, and crossfades into the piano part, which become audible around 3:18. The mono mix lets the orchestral part run at full volume until its hits a final note at 3:24. In the mono mix, the piano part has its first note coinciding with the final note of the orchestral part, at 3:24. The first few notes of the piano part are hidden by the crossfade in the stereo mix.

Edited by crapfromthepast on 14 August 2017 at 7:38pm


__________________
There's a lot of crap on the radio, but there's only one Crap From The Past.
Back to Top View crapfromthepast's Profile Search for other posts by crapfromthepast Visit crapfromthepast's Homepage
 
eriejwg
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 10 June 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3509
Posted: 14 August 2017 at 7:46pm | IP Logged Quote eriejwg

John, Yah Shure, just dissected the stereo 3:55 file
and, turns out, it doesn't match the mono promo.
Perhaps, someone at some point sent me a DES version?
The mystery continues.
Back to Top View eriejwg's Profile Search for other posts by eriejwg Visit eriejwg's Homepage
 
AndrewChouffi
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 24 September 2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1092
Posted: 15 August 2017 at 5:07am | IP Logged Quote AndrewChouffi

To eriejwg:

Quite a few years ago, a file circulated that combined the missing mono-elements of the promo 45 with the stereo version. The mono passage was cleverly "Shambala"-styled rechanneled to minimize disturbance while listening on headphones.

I don't remember who did it, but I do remember it was somebody from our forum or the BSN forum.

It's very good! It's the only version I have in my laptop for DJ gigs. You possibly have the same custom file!

Andy
Back to Top View AndrewChouffi's Profile Search for other posts by AndrewChouffi
 

Page of 2 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 0.0684 seconds.