Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
Chat Board
 Top 40 Music on Compact Disc : Chat Board
Subject Topic: Wrong Edits on new Chicago Best Of CD Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
KentT
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 25 May 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 650
Posted: 21 March 2012 at 7:01am | IP Logged Quote KentT

Interesting about the 1970-1973 frequent Columbia label design changes. They sure changed them often back then. And then kept the same 1973 design for many years hence. What we really need for CD users is a Chicago singles collection using correct single edits. Too many wrong ones used on compilations.

__________________
I turn up the good and turn down the bad!
Back to Top View KentT's Profile Search for other posts by KentT
 
Yah Shure
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 11 December 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1317
Posted: 21 March 2012 at 12:45pm | IP Logged Quote Yah Shure

Hykker wrote:
(RE: "25 Or 6 To 4")I have a promo and a stock copy of this. Both are mono. The stock copy is on what was a very short-lived label design that was apparently used for only a couple months in the summer of 1970.

Would that have been the all-red label with "COLUMBIA RECORDS" in white lettering, repeated around the label's perimeter? It was as if Columbia had decided it needed an updated look for the physical labels but wasn't happy with either that one, the red label with orange "COLUMBIA" used into 1972 or the 1972-early '73 gray label.

My stock copy of "25 Or 6 To 4" was a Pitman pressing on the older all-red label.
Back to Top View Yah Shure's Profile Search for other posts by Yah Shure
 
Hykker
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 30 October 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1386
Posted: 22 March 2012 at 12:10pm | IP Logged Quote Hykker

Yah Shure wrote:
Would that have been the all-red label with "COLUMBIA RECORDS" in white lettering, repeated around the label's perimeter?



Yep. Looked like this. Interestingly, mypromo copy was vinyl...I could count the number of vinyl Columbia singles I've seen on the fingers of one hand.
The promo copy we had where I worked in 1970 was a white-label version of my stock copy (IIRC the lettering around the circumference was blue on the promo). Different parts of the country got different labels???

Quote:

It was as if Columbia had decided it needed an updated look for the physical labels but wasn't happy with either that one, the red label with orange "COLUMBIA" used into 1972 or the 1972-early '73 gray label.


Of the various temporary labels, I liked the style on my copy of 25 Or 6 To 4 the best.

While on the subject of Chicago promo singles, here's an odd item I have...an (apparent) re-issue of "Beginnings" with the album version on one side in stereo and the mono 45 version on the other. Judging by the catalog #, it appears to have been a promo-only release. The "black sun" on the label dates it from around '74-75. It also is vinyl.
Back to Top View Hykker's Profile Search for other posts by Hykker
 
eriejwg
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 10 June 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3511
Posted: 22 March 2012 at 12:37pm | IP Logged Quote eriejwg

Hykker wrote:

While on the subject of Chicago promo singles, here's an
odd item I have...an (apparent) re-issue of "Beginnings"
with the
n-lv.jpg">album version on one side in stereo and
the mono
n-sv.jpg">45 version on the other. Judging by the
catalog #, it appears to have been a promo-only release.
The "black sun" on the label dates it from around '74-75.
It also is vinyl.


Steve, I have that very same 'oddity' promo 45, having
purchased it within the last year or so. Near mint, and
obviously purchased to get the '45' version of
"Beginnings."
Back to Top View eriejwg's Profile Search for other posts by eriejwg Visit eriejwg's Homepage
 
Bill Cahill
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 27 June 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 595
Posted: 22 March 2012 at 8:33pm | IP Logged Quote Bill Cahill

The oddity promo I believe was issued to radio in late 1975 to promote Chicago's Greatest Hits. I'm pretty sure 25 to 6 to 4 was one of the 45s included, but that had the full stereo version on one side and another Chicago song on the other. I think several 45s came in a box resembling a reel to reel tape box, With the Chicago Greatest Hits Album cover on the box, with all the cuts from the album represented as 45s (or at least several).I think they did this to make it easy for radio stations that played 45s to feature these songs as the album was a huge Christmas present item in 1975. They wanted to make sure that stations had fresh copies of the tracks.
Back to Top View Bill Cahill's Profile Search for other posts by Bill Cahill
 
Hykker
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 30 October 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1386
Posted: 23 March 2012 at 5:27am | IP Logged Quote Hykker

Bill Cahill wrote:
The oddity promo I believe was issued to radio in late 1975 to promote Chicago's Greatest Hits.   


I sort of suspected that myself. You'd think though that they'd note the song as being from the GH album, not the CTA album if it was a tie in with the GH.

I forget exactly where/when I got this single, but I think it was sometime the 80s.
Back to Top View Hykker's Profile Search for other posts by Hykker
 
Steve Carras
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 29 July 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 177
Posted: 12 June 2015 at 9:11pm | IP Logged Quote Steve Carras

Hykker wrote:
Yah Shure wrote:
Would that have
been the all-red label with "COLUMBIA RECORDS" in
white lettering, repeated around the label's
perimeter?



Yep. Looked like
/25or6to4-stock.jpg">this. Interestingly,
myer/25or6to4-promo.jpg">promo copy was
vinyl...I could count the number of vinyl Columbia
singles I've seen on the fingers of one hand.
The promo copy we had where I worked in 1970 was a
white-label version of my stock copy (IIRC the
lettering around the circumference was blue on the
promo). Different parts of the country got
different labels???

Quote:

It was as if Columbia had decided it needed an
updated look for the physical labels but wasn't
happy with either that one, the red label with
orange "COLUMBIA" used into 1972 or the 1972-early
'73 gray label.


Of the various temporary labels, I liked the style
on my copy of 25 Or 6 To 4 the best.

While on the subject of Chicago promo singles,
here's an odd item I have...an (apparent) re-issue
of "Beginnings" with the
/beginn-lv.jpg">album version on one side in
stereo and the mono
/beginn-sv.jpg">45 version on the other.
Judging by the catalog #, it appears to have been a
promo-only release. The "black sun" on the label
dates it from around '74-75. It also is vinyl.


The long version is the 6:28 length one!!

__________________
You know you're really older when you think that younger singer Jesse McCartney's related in anyway to former Beatle Paul McCartney.
Back to Top View Steve Carras's Profile Search for other posts by Steve Carras
 
Bill Cahill
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 27 June 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 595
Posted: 16 June 2015 at 5:43am | IP Logged Quote Bill Cahill

Yes I believe that "Beginnings" was part of that box of
singles that went to radio stations to promote Greatest
Hits. Label times of 2:47 and 6:28. I believe they used
the 1969 mastering of the single edit for this re-issue
promo. What's different: For 1971's single release, they
printed the label time as 2:45, and the intro features
bottom end distortion around :04, not heard on the 1969
release. Not sure why that happened.
Back to Top View Bill Cahill's Profile Search for other posts by Bill Cahill
 
eriejwg
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 10 June 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3511
Posted: 16 June 2015 at 3:27pm | IP Logged Quote eriejwg

Several years ago, I also purchased that white label,
black sun Chicago promo 45 for "Beginnings." It's
labeled as single version with a listed time of 2:47 and
is mono. The other side is listed as 6:28 and in stereo.
Back to Top View eriejwg's Profile Search for other posts by eriejwg Visit eriejwg's Homepage
 
eriejwg
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 10 June 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3511
Posted: 16 June 2015 at 3:29pm | IP Logged Quote eriejwg

My copy is also vinyl. It's labeled as being from the
Columbia LP, Chicago Transit Authority.
Back to Top View eriejwg's Profile Search for other posts by eriejwg Visit eriejwg's Homepage
 

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login
If you are not already registered you must first register

<< Prev Page of 3
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 0.0625 seconds.