Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
Chat Board
 Top 40 Music on Compact Disc : Chat Board
Subject Topic: elo "telephone line" Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
edtop40
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 29 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4996
Posted: 25 October 2005 at 7:09pm | IP Logged Quote edtop40

anyone know if the 45 version is avaialble on cd.........allmusic states that a cd titled "a year in your life 1977" contains a 4:03 version.........i'm hoping this cd contains the 3:57 45 version..........anybody know????????

__________________
edtop40
Back to Top View edtop40's Profile Search for other posts by edtop40
 
Brian W.
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 13 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2507
Posted: 25 October 2005 at 9:45pm | IP Logged Quote Brian W.

I was hoping that, too, but Pat's database, before it went down, listed it as the full-length 4:30 (or thereabouts) LP Version.
Back to Top View Brian W.'s Profile Search for other posts by Brian W.
 
sriv94
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 16 September 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1456
Posted: 27 October 2005 at 8:14am | IP Logged Quote sriv94

AllMusic has a few mistakes like that. The Rock On 1981 CD's jacket states that LRB's "The Night Owls" runs 3:45 (the Excelsior version), and AllMusic took that as gospel (and of course, was wrong). The entry was corrected for the Madacy 1996 version.

So there are a number of occasions where they'll use what's on the CD jacket and be wrong (but not always).

Turning this back to "Telephone Line," the 45 removes the sound effects at the top and fades a bit earlier than the LP--is that correct, or is there another edit or two involved?

__________________
Doug
---------------
All of the good signatures have been taken.
Back to Top View sriv94's Profile Search for other posts by sriv94
 
Paul Esch
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 15 August 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 114
Posted: 29 October 2005 at 1:39pm | IP Logged Quote Paul Esch

No, that's correct. The only sound effect left at the beginning is the
last little synthesizer cascade before the first notes of the song.
Back to Top View Paul Esch's Profile Search for other posts by Paul Esch
 
sriv94
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 16 September 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1456
Posted: 29 October 2005 at 2:30pm | IP Logged Quote sriv94

Paul Esch wrote:
No, that's correct. The only sound effect left at the beginning is the
last little synthesizer cascade before the first notes of the song.


Great. And the running time is (3:57), yes? (Just making sure run time matches with printed label time.)

Edited by sriv94 on 29 October 2005 at 2:31pm


__________________
Doug
---------------
All of the good signatures have been taken.
Back to Top View sriv94's Profile Search for other posts by sriv94
 
Paul Esch
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 15 August 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 114
Posted: 29 October 2005 at 3:55pm | IP Logged Quote Paul Esch

Yes, that's the correct time. And, by the way, if you want to get the
45 version of "Evil Woman," get the version off of Rhino's Like
Omigod! The 80's Pop Culture Box
and edit out the line "I came
a-runnin' every time you cried" in the last verse, and voila!
Back to Top View Paul Esch's Profile Search for other posts by Paul Esch
 
Moderator
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 10 July 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 446
Posted: 29 October 2005 at 6:28pm | IP Logged Quote Moderator

??????Evil Woman was from 1976 and there are no ELO songs on the Omigod! The 80's Pop Culture Box.

__________________
Top 40 Music On Compact Disc Moderator
Back to Top View Moderator's Profile Search for other posts by Moderator
 
sriv94
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 16 September 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1456
Posted: 29 October 2005 at 6:37pm | IP Logged Quote sriv94

Moderator wrote:
??????Evil Woman was from 1976 and there are no ELO songs on the Omigod! The 80's Pop Culture Box.


I think Paul meant the Have A Nice Decade 1970s box, which does have an edit of "Evil Woman" (although as he said, it's not the 45 because they made one editing error).

__________________
Doug
---------------
All of the good signatures have been taken.
Back to Top View sriv94's Profile Search for other posts by sriv94
 
Paul Esch
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 15 August 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 114
Posted: 30 October 2005 at 6:21am | IP Logged Quote Paul Esch

Yes, that's what I meant. Sorry.
Back to Top View Paul Esch's Profile Search for other posts by Paul Esch
 
jimct
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 07 April 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3906
Posted: 15 April 2008 at 3:43pm | IP Logged Quote jimct

I have just timed my commercial 45, and, contrary to info appearing earlier in this thread, my 45 has a listed time of (3:57), but an actual time of (4:00). My 45, purchased in 1977, has green vinyl, and features deadwax of "UAST-17907-E".
Back to Top View jimct's Profile Search for other posts by jimct
 
Bill Cahill
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 27 June 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 595
Posted: 16 April 2008 at 4:45am | IP Logged Quote Bill Cahill

If I recall the version of "Evil Woman" (and all issues of the alleged single edit on cd) are an incorrect edit. The database states, "neither the LP or 45 version" for the "Have a Nice Day" box. If you start a thread on "Evil Woman" I'm sure that somebody will recall the difference, I forget what it is.
Back to Top View Bill Cahill's Profile Search for other posts by Bill Cahill
 
aaronk
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Online
Posts: 6513
Posted: 08 October 2010 at 1:27pm | IP Logged Quote aaronk

sriv94 wrote:
Turning this back to "Telephone Line," the 45 removes the sound effects at the top and fades a bit earlier than the LP--is that correct, or is there another edit or two involved?

Actually, this is not quite right. I just verified that it has an edit near the end, rather than fading early.
Back to Top View aaronk's Profile Search for other posts by aaronk Visit aaronk's Homepage
 
KentT
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 25 May 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 650
Posted: 08 October 2010 at 5:14pm | IP Logged Quote KentT

The first DTMF touchtones are edited on the single, it has an edit on the last verse and it's faded early. My Green vinyl 45 is timed out at 4:00 on United Artists and is excellent Stereo.

Edited by KentT on 08 October 2010 at 5:15pm


__________________
I turn up the good and turn down the bad!
Back to Top View KentT's Profile Search for other posts by KentT
 
aaronk
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Online
Posts: 6513
Posted: 08 October 2010 at 6:46pm | IP Logged Quote aaronk

KentT wrote:
The first DTMF touchtones
are edited on the single, it has an edit on the
last verse and it's faded early. My Green
vinyl 45 is timed out at 4:00 on United Artists
and is excellent Stereo.

Hmmm, that's not what I'm hearing on the
single dub I have. The intro starts as others
have described above; however I did not
detect an edit on the last verse. Also, the
fade of the single is the same audio as the
fade of the LP. If you listen to the last chorus
on both, pay attention to the strings. That is a
giveaway that it's an edit and not an early
fade.
Back to Top View aaronk's Profile Search for other posts by aaronk Visit aaronk's Homepage
 
KentT
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 25 May 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 650
Posted: 22 October 2010 at 7:00pm | IP Logged Quote KentT

Dug out my Green vinyl 45 and my A New World Record LP on United Artists. I checked the phasing on my system and found an anomaly. Fixed it and the LP and 45 fade exact. So we have the DTMF touch tones and an brief edit in the last verse as the official differences here. Both pressings are first runs purchased new in 1977.

__________________
I turn up the good and turn down the bad!
Back to Top View KentT's Profile Search for other posts by KentT
 
The Hits Man
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 04 February 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 665
Posted: 05 November 2010 at 9:59pm | IP Logged Quote The Hits Man

Telephone Line: Unless you get a vinyl dub on CD,
it does not exist on CD. Here's the explanation from
Kevin Gray, thee guy who cut the album and single in
1977.

http://www.stevehoffman.tv/forums/showthread.php?
t=19248&highlight=telephone+line

Quote:
Hi Gang,

Steve and I were returning from lunch today and “Living
Thing” by ELO
started playing on my car radio. I said to Steve, “Now
that was a crazy
mastering session! Would you believe we did a vocal
overdub before we cut
it?” After I told Steve the story he suggested I write it
up for the forum,
so here goes.

On a Friday afternoon Dino Lapis from UA Records called
Artisan Sound, where
I worked at the time, and said that ELO needed to master
their new album
(New World Record) but needed to do a vocal overdub
first. Artisan Sound
had just finished its second mastering room and was in
the process of
building a mix-down room. But it wasn’t finished yet.
Bob MacLeod, owner of Artisan, suggested doing the
overdub to two track and
splicing just the overdubbed sections back into the
original master. Jeff
Lynne actually preferred this idea to re-mixing, as he
was quite happy with
his original mix overall. So on Saturady morning Jeff
Lynne came into
Artisan and sang the vocals for the lines in "Livin'
Thing" “I’m takin’ a dive” and “I’m
takin’, I’m takin’ ” and Bob MacLeod recorded the “micro”
session.

This is how it was done:

Jeff Lynne listened to his original mix with headphones.
The mix was played back through 2 line inputs,panned hard
left and right,on
a portable Electrodyne mixer and a Neumann U-87 mic was
plugged into a mic
input panned to center. The output of the mixer fed a
second Studer A-80
two-track recorder. Jeff's voice along with original mix
were fed to the
new tape. When finished, just the sections with the added
vocal were spliced
back into the original mix.

Clever eh? It was a little more difficult
than it sounds. Also, getting the level of Jeff’s voice
right in the mix
took a few trial passes, but if I recall correctly, I
think he did the
actual take of each line in one pass. ...Two or three at
most.
Bob and I both worked on the mastering. I cut all the
final lacquers, and
there were lots! ...Maybe 16 sets for the US and the
world.

One other
tidbit... The telephone effect on “Telephone Line” was
actually done by me
in mastering. It is NOT on the master tape that way!

Jeff for some reason didn’t think about it ‘til
mastering. He asked if I could do a "telephone effect".

We took a ”ton” of bass out and put a “ton” of midrange
in one Sontec EQ (to
give the exaggerated telephone feel), then set a second
Sontec up with the
EQ for the rest of the song. Then I did a long, slow
cross-fade between the
2 Eqs in real time as I cut each lacquer. ...a little
tricky. I still
remember having sweaty palms every time I cut an acetate
on that side. We made a tape copy and everything of a
reissue nature has been cut from that dub.

This
is why so many reissues get cut from tape copies. (Even
some first
releases!) BUT not from Steve and me!

Best to all,

Kev


Living Thing: As far as I know, the actual 45 edit
does not appear on CD. I made a nice needledrop of the
45.

Edited by The Hits Man on 05 November 2010 at 10:05pm


__________________
Back to Top View The Hits Man's Profile Search for other posts by The Hits Man
 
Yah Shure
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 11 December 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1317
Posted: 05 November 2010 at 11:18pm | IP Logged Quote Yah Shure

The Hits Man wrote:

Kevin Gray said: "I still remember having sweaty palms every time I cut an acetate on that side. We made a tape copy and everything of a reissue nature has been cut from that dub."


Grant, thanks for re-posting Kevin's notes. Very interesting! I still have a copy of that Artisan acetate and will give it a listen.
Back to Top View Yah Shure's Profile Search for other posts by Yah Shure
 
Brian W.
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 13 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2507
Posted: 06 November 2010 at 10:30am | IP Logged Quote Brian W.

Very interesting! Thanks for posting, this, Grant. So if I'm understanding correctly, there is a tape for the single version, but it's actually a disc dub of the acetate?
Back to Top View Brian W.'s Profile Search for other posts by Brian W.
 
aaronk
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Online
Posts: 6513
Posted: 06 November 2010 at 12:48pm | IP Logged Quote aaronk

Brian W. wrote:
Very interesting! Thanks for posting, this, Grant. So if I'm understanding correctly, there is a tape for the single version, but it's actually a disc dub of the acetate?

I don't think that's exactly what he was saying, and I think Grant is also mistaken. The single is an edit of the LP version; however, the LP version on all sources was "mastered" as it was cut, with the telephone effect on the opening vocals.

"We made a tape copy and everything of a
reissue nature has been cut from that dub."


I took this to mean that they also made a tape copy in the same way they made the lacquers, which is what is used on all reissues of the LP/CD copies. That means original pressings of the LP will vary slightly on the intro, since the synchronizing of the two sources was done in real time while cutting each lacquer.

I've never heard any version of "Telephone Line" that does not have the telephone effect on the opening vocal, which is apparently how it exists on the master tape.

Edited by aaronk on 06 November 2010 at 1:07pm
Back to Top View aaronk's Profile Search for other posts by aaronk Visit aaronk's Homepage
 
Yah Shure
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 11 December 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1317
Posted: 06 November 2010 at 2:13pm | IP Logged Quote Yah Shure

Aaron, I also came away with the same interpretation that you did, in that the tape had been made in the same manner as the lacquers and acetates.
Back to Top View Yah Shure's Profile Search for other posts by Yah Shure
 

Page of 2 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 0.0625 seconds.