Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
Chat Board
 Top 40 Music on Compact Disc : Chat Board
Subject Topic: "Holdin’ On To Yesterday" - Ambrosia Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
sriv94
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 16 September 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1457
Posted: 19 July 2009 at 8:25pm | IP Logged Quote sriv94

I saw there was a little discussion in the "Incorrect Run Times" thread about Ambrosia's "Holdin' On To Yesterday." At some point, the designation for this song in the database for any (3:21) entries was "45 version," but after further review that the 45 actually runs (3:27), the designation had changed to "edit of the LP version in an unsuccessful attempt to recreate the 45." Aside from the fade being six seconds too early, what was wrong with the edit that was made? I'm trying to compare it to a 45 dub that John G. provided me, and I'm having trouble figuring it out; which means it must be something obvious.

Thanks!

__________________
Doug
---------------
All of the good signatures have been taken.
Back to Top View sriv94's Profile Search for other posts by sriv94
 
Santi Paradoa
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 17 February 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1117
Posted: 25 July 2015 at 6:56pm | IP Logged Quote Santi Paradoa

I'd also like to know where the "incorrect" edit went wrong
(or is the mistake in just fading too early).

__________________
Santi Paradoa
Miami, Florida
Back to Top View Santi Paradoa's Profile Search for other posts by Santi Paradoa
 
edtop40
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 29 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4996
Posted: 26 July 2015 at 8:12pm | IP Logged Quote edtop40

santi...just sent you the 3:27 45 version...

__________________
edtop40
Back to Top View edtop40's Profile Search for other posts by edtop40
 
Pat Downey
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 01 October 2003
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1742
Posted: 27 July 2015 at 9:36am | IP Logged Quote Pat Downey

On the 3 cd's in the database that run (3:22) or so, the instrumental bridge is much longer than what is found on the 45.
Back to Top View Pat Downey's Profile Search for other posts by Pat Downey
 
Santi Paradoa
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 17 February 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1117
Posted: 29 July 2015 at 5:44pm | IP Logged Quote Santi Paradoa

Thank you very much Ed for sending me that file. The 45
version Ed sent me matches the Time Life Sounds Of The
Seventies version for the first two minutes. Then, As Pat
mentioned above, the instrumental bridge is much longer.
Too bad these folks couldn't get their edit(s) correct.
There are a hand full of tracks on that Time Life series
were the edits are close but incorrect (ELO's "Evil Woman"
and Thin Lizzy's "Boys Are Back In Town" are two more I
recall off the top of my head).

__________________
Santi Paradoa
Miami, Florida
Back to Top View Santi Paradoa's Profile Search for other posts by Santi Paradoa
 
AdvprosD
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 12 June 2020
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 354
Posted: 29 July 2020 at 7:20pm | IP Logged Quote AdvprosD

This song!

I seem to remember hearing this song on the radio as a teenager and didn't think too much of it until I started seeing it pop up in several "Various Artists" type compilations.
None of which I can recant off the top of my head, but betting it probably was Time-Life.

The instrumental bridge is exactly what started bugging me so much. I thought I was having seizures during this bridge. At several points it sounds like someone got a little wild
with the razor and tape and was just slamming pieces together. I am not at all a musician, but the abruptness of the sections almost fried my noggin'.

I searched a bit on this board, but didn't find much about it. I see after lurking a few weeks, that most folks here are highly gifted in the technical sense of relating to songs
in the posts. My apologies for being a bit coarse in my description on this one. I think I'm going to go pull it up and get some time details and the source for a more accurate
description of what bugs me about this song.

I just had to comment though. It's been one of those on the back burner of a brain fold for years now.


<Dave>
Back to Top View AdvprosD's Profile Search for other posts by AdvprosD
 

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login
If you are not already registered you must first register

  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 0.0625 seconds.