Author |
|
Todd Ireland MusicFan
Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 4219
|
Posted: 17 August 2013 at 2:02am | IP Logged
|
|
|
The database currently shows the following general comment for Janet Jackson's "All for You":
(dj copies of this cd single contain the )
This certainly looks like another one of those instances where a technical glitch caused the rest of the comment to get cut off due to quotation marks being present.
|
Back to Top |
|
|
PopArchivist MusicFan
Joined: 30 June 2018 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 1524
|
Posted: 19 July 2020 at 11:14am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Can anyone identify where the [Intro Edit] comes from? I have a 4:04 that appears official but no idea where it originated from. Is this an official radio edit possibly from the UK?
Starts out with a chica chica sound and the instrumental for a few seconds and then Janet starting the chorus about 7-8 seconds into it.
Edited by PopArchivist on 19 July 2020 at 11:14am
__________________ "I'm a pop archivist, not a chart philosopher, I seek to listen, observe and document the chart position of music."
|
Back to Top |
|
|
Brian W. MusicFan
Joined: 13 October 2004 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 2507
|
Posted: 19 July 2020 at 3:55pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Is there just one "chicka-ahh" at the beginning, or more
than one? Is it just the Radio Edit with everything
before that sliced off? Because that would put it at
4:05.
I went through every entry on Discogs and don't see
anything with a runtime even close to 4:04 except the
Top Heavy Mix.
|
Back to Top |
|
|
PopArchivist MusicFan
Joined: 30 June 2018 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 1524
|
Posted: 19 July 2020 at 8:11pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Brian W. wrote:
Is there just one "chicka-ahh" at the beginning, or more
than one? Is it just the Radio Edit with everything
before that sliced off? Because that would put it at
4:05.
I went through every entry on Discogs and don't see
anything with a runtime even close to 4:04 except the
Top Heavy Mix. |
|
|
Check your PM. Then let me know what you think.
__________________ "I'm a pop archivist, not a chart philosopher, I seek to listen, observe and document the chart position of music."
|
Back to Top |
|
|
Brian W. MusicFan
Joined: 13 October 2004 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 2507
|
Posted: 22 July 2020 at 5:24pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
The "Intro Edit" that Rich has is interesting. It runs a
hair slower than the Radio Edit, and also fades a second
or two earlier. Other than that, it appears to be
identical to the Radio Edit, but with everything up to
Janet's "Chicka-ahh" deleted. Not sure what the source
of this is... I can find no reference to it online. The
slight difference in speed is what intrigues me the
most.
|
Back to Top |
|
|