| Author |
|
jimct
MusicFan
Joined: 07 April 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3906
|
| Posted: 06 April 2007 at 4:08am | IP Logged
|
|
|
My 1970 commercial 45 release, which is mono, has a listed time of (3:43), but an actual time of (3:41). I post this because the only CD in the database stating it's the "hit single version" has a running time of (3:48), :07 longer than my 45. My 45 does feature a severe, quick, pretty horrible fade, which is probably not duplicated on that database CD. Since there's probably been more Neil Diamond inquiries on this Board than for any other pre-Madonna-era artist, I decided to pass these extra details along, for those who may be interested.
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
eriejwg
MusicFan
Joined: 10 June 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3509
|
| Posted: 30 January 2011 at 11:25am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Can someone give fade point times to replicate this, as Jim termed it, "severe fade" ?
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Yah Shure
MusicFan
Joined: 11 December 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1317
|
| Posted: 30 January 2011 at 1:51pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
John, I'll shoot you a dub of my 45, which matches Jim's (3:41) actual playing time.
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
eriejwg
MusicFan
Joined: 10 June 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3509
|
| Posted: 01 February 2011 at 10:23am | IP Logged
|
|
|
After listening to the dub of John's 45, the 45 is definitely drier than the hit single mix in stereo, which has slightly more reverb. Even when you convert the stereo track to mono, it's not as dry as the 45. IMHO.
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Active Topics 
Memberlist 
Search 
Help
Register 
Login
Top 40 Music on Compact Disc : Chat Board
Topic: Neil Diamond-"Shilo"
