| Author |
|
aaronk
Admin Group
Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Online
Posts: 6513
|
| Posted: 06 February 2011 at 1:25pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
There is an online listing for a US promo CD of "Just For Tonight" with catalog number CDP 673. It is a 1-track with a printed time of 4:19, but the listing doesn't say what version is listed on the disc. I've seen US 45s label the song as "Single Edit."
I do have a copy on my TM Century GoldDisc labeled as "Single Edit" with an actual time of 4:19. It appears the database will likely have to be updated, as nothing is currently listed next to the CDs containing the song.
Edited by aaronk on 06 February 2011 at 1:28pm
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Underground Dub
MusicFan
Joined: 10 July 2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 348
|
| Posted: 06 February 2011 at 7:37pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
I've got this one... it is indeed the remixed 'Single Edit' version. The promo actually has this mix repeated for a total of 3 tracks.
The disc itself reads "1, 2 & 3: Just For Tonight (Single Edit) 4:19".
Edited by Underground Dub on 06 February 2011 at 7:51pm
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
aaronk
Admin Group
Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Online
Posts: 6513
|
| Posted: 06 February 2011 at 8:38pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Thanks, Underground Dub!
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
edtop40
MusicFan
Joined: 29 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4996
|
| Posted: 08 February 2011 at 8:56pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
my cassingle issued as wing 865888 does not state a version on the sleeve or cassette but does list a run time of 4:27 and is the same as the full length cd/lp version from the cd
(4:26) Wing/Mercury 843522 The Comfort Zone (LP version)
so the entries in the d/b are incorrect....the cassingle and lp versions are the same.....
i also have the promo cd single issued as wing cdp 673 with three tracks all listed as the same version as listed below
1-just for tonight (single edit) (4:19 listed; 4:18 actual)
so the d/b entries need to be changed...
__________________
edtop40
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
thecdguy
MusicFan
Joined: 14 August 2019
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 633
|
| Posted: 08 February 2020 at 9:00am | IP Logged
|
|
|
So I guess this is a case where the 45 and Cassette
Single versions were different? The US 45 listing on
Discogs shows "Just For Tonight - Single Mix" as both
the A and B side of the 45. Wonder why they didn't put
something else on the B-Side?
Edited by thecdguy on 08 February 2020 at 9:02am
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
ChicagoBill
MusicFan
Joined: 06 November 2019
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 193
|
| Posted: 08 February 2020 at 4:11pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
My 45 RPM vinyl single (Wing 422-865888-7) states 'Single Edit' (4:19 listed; 4:18 actual) and has the exact same thing on the 'B' side. This was the fourth single pulled from Vanessa Williams, "Comfort Zone". Strangely, I have a release date of the 45 RPM single as 7/13/1992. By this time, it had already stalled on the Billboard Hot 100. By the time we got it in the store, customers stopped asking for it. Why did Polygram even bother? -Bill.
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
thecdguy
MusicFan
Joined: 14 August 2019
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 633
|
| Posted: 19 February 2020 at 10:56am | IP Logged
|
|
|
ChicagoBill wrote:
My 45 RPM vinyl single (Wing 422-
865888-7) states 'Single Edit' (4:19 listed; 4:18 actual)
and has the exact same thing on the 'B' side. This was
the fourth single pulled from Vanessa Williams, "Comfort
Zone". Strangely, I have a release date of the 45 RPM
single as 7/13/1992. By this time, it had already stalled
on the Billboard Hot 100. By the time we got it in the
store, customers stopped asking for it. Why did Polygram
even bother? -Bill. |
|
|
Good question. I guess to appease the vinyl 45 lovers? By
then, in 1992, Cassette Singles were outselling 45's, so
that would explain why customers had stopped asking for
it by the time the 45 came out. I guess the bigger
question is why did they wait so long to release the 45?
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
eric_a
MusicFan
Joined: 29 June 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 442
|
| Posted: 19 February 2020 at 11:30am | IP Logged
|
|
|
thecdguy wrote:
I guess the bigger
question is why did they wait so long to release the 45?
|
|
|
By 1992, weren't jukebox operators driving most vinyl 45
sales? I bet that market would have lagged radio and
retail sales, since coin-op consumers looked for
familiar tunes.
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
ChicagoBill
MusicFan
Joined: 06 November 2019
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 193
|
| Posted: 21 February 2020 at 4:32pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
In our store, most of the sales of vinyl 45's were attributed to Mobile DJ's doing weddings or parties who, if they received a request for a particular song, would rather spend under $3.00 for a vinyl single than a C.D. which were quite expensive in 1992. It's also funny when I think about it that the demographics for a 45 RPM single buyer in the late 60's was female and 16-17 years of age, and in the 80's, it was male and 30-40 years of age!! -Bill.
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Active Topics 
Memberlist 
Search 
Help
Register 
Login
Top 40 Music on Compact Disc : Chat Board
Topic: Vanessa Williams - Just For Tonight
