Author |
|
mainrhythm MusicFan
Joined: 30 August 2010 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 117
|
Posted: 27 March 2011 at 7:32am | IP Logged
|
|
|
When you guys are asking for actual times, which one do you prefer?
Is it, stick the cd in a player and look at the remaining track times?
Or is it look at the track in a digital editor, chop off the absolute silence then report the result?
I've been using the second method and wondered which was correct.
Thanks!
Edited by mainrhythm on 27 March 2011 at 7:39am
|
Back to Top |
|
|
Yah Shure MusicFan
Joined: 11 December 2007 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 1317
|
Posted: 27 March 2011 at 8:04am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Another vote for method number two. It's the best way to ensure accuracy, particularly with vinyl fades.
Edited by Yah Shure on 27 March 2011 at 8:06am
|
Back to Top |
|
|
mainrhythm MusicFan
Joined: 30 August 2010 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 117
|
Posted: 27 March 2011 at 9:03am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Forgot about vinyl / 45s and the second method is obvious for that, oops. lol
|
Back to Top |
|
|
Todd Ireland MusicFan
Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 4219
|
Posted: 27 March 2011 at 11:24am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Given that some CD tracks have many seconds worth of silence before and/or after the song which can artificially inflate a track's total run time, I'm sure hoping for accuracy purposes that everyone here is reporting their actual run time info based on the precise points when the first and last traces of an musical audio signal can be heard.
Edited by Todd Ireland on 27 March 2011 at 11:27am
|
Back to Top |
|
|
eriejwg MusicFan
Joined: 10 June 2007 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 3509
|
Posted: 27 March 2011 at 12:26pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
I know what small contributions I've made are based on the actualbeginning of audio and end audio. I don't include silence.
|
Back to Top |
|
|