| Author |
|
jimct
MusicFan
Joined: 07 April 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3906
|
| Posted: 13 June 2013 at 8:43am | IP Logged
|
|
|
More than anything, this post is simply to "poll the brain cells" of my
fellow T4MOC-ers.
#2 has always seemed to me to be *way* too high a BB peak position for
this song in 1975. This is nothing personal - I like the record. All of the
CT Top 40 stations exclusively played the originally-intended A-side of
the 45, "I'm Sorry", and did very well with it. None of them ever officially
added "Calypso." (I never even heard them "spike it" on-air.) I first
discovered that I thought what was simply a great B-side was becoming a
hit in its own right, was when Casey Kasem played it on AT40.
If I recall correctly, "Calypso" shared its entire Hot 100 chart run with "I'm
Sorry." And, checking the chart sites, there were surely 8-10 US markets
where "Calypso" was a big hit, and charted Top 10 on their survey. But, in
total, "I'm Sorry" has appeared on over 150 surveys, while "Calypso" shows
up on just 52. That jives with my overall gut feeling about the song - that
it should probably show as a Top 10 to 20 peaking song. But #2?
I am curious how "the chart powers that be" ended up arriving at the
"Calypso" ultimate chart position? Was there human judgement involved
on this, after the fact? The RR volume I use the most (due to numerous
pencil notations I have in it) has "I'm Sorry" as the #32 biggest hit for
1975, with "Calypso" right behind, at #36. I was listening to Top 40 quite
a bit back then, and I was certainly aware that "Calypso" was getting solid
Top 40 airplay. But, like with all double-sided hits, how do you know
which side the buyer is buying it for? An individual 45 side's Top 40 radio
airplay was far easier to observe/document.
Although I know our buddy Paul Haney had nothing to do with compiling
the Hot 100 charts back in 1975 (or ever), perhaps he can chime in on
how RR arrived at its ultimate 1975 Pop Annual placing for "Calypso", and
how they've determined it to be 99% as big a hit as "I'm Sorry" was. I'm
positive there are legitimate reasons for it - I just don't happen to know
what they are!
No hurry, Paul. Whenever you get time. :)
Any other opinions?
Edited by jimct on 13 June 2013 at 8:46am
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
EdisonLite
MusicFan
Joined: 18 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2237
|
| Posted: 13 June 2013 at 9:51am | IP Logged
|
|
|
All I can say is I heard "Calypso" all the time on the radio back in 1975. I listened to Boston and Providence, RI stations (not too far from CT!), where "Calypso" was a big hit. Having not even known about Billboard as a kid then, I would have guessed (if someone asked me) that "Calypso" peaked between #3 and #5, just based on how often I heard it. Certainly didn't feel like a #10-#20 hit. Also, I did my own personal charts (starting in 1974), and on my chart it peaked at #3! Not that my chart was supposed to be a ranking of how often I heard a song on the radio (it was a ranking of how much I liked a song), but ... to get to #3, I think that would only happen if I was hearing it a lot. Of course, I can only react as a person who heard it in my market. If there were other cities in the US not playing it, I wouldn't know. All I can say is ... it felt like a big radio hit to me. And it's true Jim, no magazine can ever predict which side of a 45 a person is buying it for (when both are played on the radio.) Kinda like how Billboard can't determine if people are viewing Rebecca Black's "Friday" on YouTube because they think it's a joke or because they love the song and think it's an amazing piece of songwriting. (And had Billboard had its current chart policies in use back three years ago, I think "Friday" would have been a #1 hit - because no one was buying it but everyone was viewing it as a joke (basically) when checking it out on YouTube.
Edited by EdisonLite on 13 June 2013 at 9:53am
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
AndrewChouffi
MusicFan
Joined: 24 September 2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1092
|
| Posted: 13 June 2013 at 9:57am | IP Logged
|
|
|
To Jim:
"Calypso" received a #2 position in Joel Whitburn's books because of Record Research's current policy of assigning a peak position to a nominally tag-along b-side if there was a time when Billboard switched its A-side position.
"I'm Sorry" (alone) debuted on the Hot 10 August 16, 1975; made it to #1 without a bullet September 27. Radio stations began to play "Calypso" & RCA began to push it (very similar to "Undun" by the Guess Who).
"I'm Sorry" dropped to #2 the following week. By the week of October 11, 1975 Billboard apparently decided that the promotion on "Calypso" was so strong they listed the record as "Calypso/I'm Sorry" where it remained at #2 for four more weeks!
Competing chart 'Cashbox' was charting double-sided hits separately at the time and took "Calypso" up to #26.
It's always been hard to assign a chart position to a double-sided hit because each side sells the exact same amount of copies!
"Calypso" did receive a very decent amount of airplay, as a matter of fact on the 1975 Radio & Records year-end Pop/75 of '75 chart it was listed as "Calypso/I'm Sorry" instead of the other way around.
Andy
Edited by AndrewChouffi on 13 June 2013 at 9:58am
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
jono
MusicFan
Joined: 26 September 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 147
|
| Posted: 13 June 2013 at 10:16am | IP Logged
|
|
|
I remember hearing "Calypso" a lot in the Milwaukee area around that
time, but not sure if it was played more or less than the flip side (I was
only 9). I do know that "Calypso" made a bigger impression on me,
probably because of the video from his tv special (I think), where there
were scenes from being on Jacques Cousteau's ship (first time I heard
it). If nothing else, that song is more embedded in my memory than "I'm
Sorry", and I would've guessed had a higher chart position (to me,
catchier as well, although I wouldn't want to try to sing along). But again
I was 9 and a song with a video about a ship would've been more
exciting to me than an apologetic, confessional song.
My parents had the album, but I would've bought the 45 for "Calypso",
for what it's worth.
Jon O.
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
80smusicfreak
MusicFan
Joined: 14 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 527
|
| Posted: 13 June 2013 at 11:03am | IP Logged
|
|
|
jimct wrote:
| In my experiences, buying quality reference books about music is always a good thing! |
|
|
Quoting you from a George Harrison thread just a couple days ago, but I, too, have always subscribed to that same reasoning. And in this case, I feel that Christopher G. Feldman covered your question quite well in his 2000 softcover book, The Billboard Book of No. 2 Singles (Billboard Books; ISBN no. 0-8230-7695-4). Half a page is devoted to this two-sided hit from '75, and in fact AndrewChouffi's post above almost reads like a more condensed version of Feldman's explanation. Unfortunately, the book is now out-of-print; I obtained mine brand new, directly from Feldman himself on eBay about five years ago. (He also signed it before shipping it out to me, lol.) Definitely a fun read; recommended...
And while I lived in Northern California at the time, I definitely concur w/ the first four sentences of EdisonLite's post above...
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
jimct
MusicFan
Joined: 07 April 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3906
|
| Posted: 13 June 2013 at 12:58pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Andy/80s music freak/Gordon/jono, thank you. Your
explanations/background was very helpful to me. Jono, I do agree -
Calypso *was* the more much memorable side. I especially found the part
about when Billboard listed the two as "Calypso/I'm Sorry", in that order,
while it held the #2 spot on the Hot 100, to be quite significant. To me,
that's a "slam dunk" reason to have it be exactly where it is: Peaking at #2.
I did try to present some relevant facts. The best, non-BB, 1975 radio
chart info that I know to be available. The 150+ surveys (I'm Sorry), vs 52
surveys (Calypso) is fact, not opinion. It's a large difference. True, it's not
a scientifically accurate sample. But it's the best of what's out there. If
Calypso was on 150+ surveys, and I'm Sorry only 52, I would've asked the
exact same question.
That being said, I still think, at some point, that the human element came
into play, and made a "which title first, chart judgement call." But then
again, I'm sure such things happened every single week, during Hot 100
prep!
Edited by jimct on 13 June 2013 at 12:58pm
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
TomDiehl1
MusicFan
Joined: 13 January 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 719
|
| Posted: 13 June 2013 at 4:53pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
I first heard the record in the early 90's when I was a kid. By that, I mean, Calypso. It was on some radio show on NPR, I think..... that side really grabbed me immediately and later when I found the 45, I played I'm Sorry once, and that was it.... I didn't like that side as much, if at all.
However, in all of my years hunting down promo 45s, I've never seen a promo 45 with Calypso on it. I've only come across mono/stereo promos of I'm Sorry, and I might even have one of those in my collection even though I don't care for the song....
__________________
Live in stereo.
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
jimct
MusicFan
Joined: 07 April 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3906
|
| Posted: 13 June 2013 at 5:42pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Tom, a "Calypso" promo 45 does exist. I just pulled it for you. It has
"Calypso" on both sides; both sides are stereo. Both sides have a listed time
of (3:29), and an actual time of (3:33). Both my stock copies show a slightly
different listed time (3:32), but they also run (3:33).
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Todd Ireland
MusicFan
Joined: 16 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4219
|
| Posted: 13 June 2013 at 8:35pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
I can remember hearing "Calypso" for the first time on the radio sometime in the early '80s when I was a kid and quickly fell in love with the song. Funny story... I was a fan of the Smurfs cartoon series at the time and I could swear I thought John Denver was singing "Azraeeeel dooooo doo-doo-doo-doo" during the song's chorus. Azrael of course was the feline nemesis of the Smurfs! :-)
Edited by Todd Ireland on 13 June 2013 at 8:46pm
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Paul Haney
MusicFan
Joined: 01 April 2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1743
|
| Posted: 14 June 2013 at 5:21am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Sorry that I'm late to this "Calypso" party, but Andy pretty much nailed the BB explanation above. It's interesting to note that Mr. Whitburn has since revised his thinking on this one. He always thought that the #2 peak was too high for this particular song, so we now show "Calypso" as a "tag-along" B-side for 10 weeks, with no actual chart position. It's cases like this one where I wish Billboard would've kept the songs separate like Cash Box did at the time.
As for my personal experience, I don't remember hearing "Calypso" much on my local Top 40s at the time (certainly nowhere near as much as "I'm Sorry"). In fact, I was quite surprised when Casey started playing it on AT40.
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Hykker
MusicFan
Joined: 30 October 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1386
|
| Posted: 14 June 2013 at 6:30am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Paul Haney wrote:
It's cases like this one where I wish
Billboard would've kept the songs separate like Cash Box
did at the time.
As for my personal experience, I don't remember hearing
"Calypso" much on my local Top 40s at the time (certainly
nowhere near as much as "I'm Sorry"). In fact, I was
quite surprised when Casey started playing it on AT40.
|
|
|
I'm with EdisonLite on this...I took a cross-country road
trip in Sept. '75, and judging by the scoped airchecks I
made off the car radio, airplay across the country was
about 70-30 in favor of "Calypso", with most play of "I'm
Sorry" on AC stations.
I disagree with your preference for separate chart
positions. Never understood why a chart that ranks sales
as a major factor would have A & B sides of a legitimate
2-sided hit charted differently, especially given that
airplay spin reports were unreliable at best pre-
Mediabase monitoring.
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Paul Haney
MusicFan
Joined: 01 April 2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1743
|
| Posted: 14 June 2013 at 7:56am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Hykker wrote:
I disagree with your preference for separate chart
positions. Never understood why a chart that ranks sales
as a major factor would have A & B sides of a legitimate
2-sided hit charted differently, especially given that
airplay spin reports were unreliable at best pre-
Mediabase monitoring. |
|
|
Well, then I guess you didn't like the Hot 100 from 1958-69, because that's the way they ranked hundreds of hits! And who's to say that the sales reports were any more reliable than the airplay reports at that time?
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
aaronk
Admin Group
Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6513
|
| Posted: 14 June 2013 at 9:28am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Hykker wrote:
| Never understood why a chart that ranks sales as a major factor would have A & B sides of a legitimate 2-sided hit charted differently |
|
|
I see your point, but if that were the case, then they could have listed an A & B side for every song that ever charted. After all, sales for both the A & B side would be the same for every song purchased. I don't have a problem with single sides having different chart positions since sales was not the only factor taken into account. After reading this thread, there is a pretty wide variance on what different board members recall being the most played side.
I also agree with Paul that airplay and sales reports could have both been equally unreliable.
Edited by aaronk on 14 June 2013 at 9:29am
__________________
Aaron Kannowski
Uptown Sound
91.9 The Peak - Classic Hip Hop
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
EdisonLite
MusicFan
Joined: 18 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2237
|
| Posted: 14 June 2013 at 9:49am | IP Logged
|
|
|
I just want to add one more comment to my one above. I mentioned hearing "Calypso" a lot. What I didn't mention is that I didn't hear "I'm Sorry" nearly as much. Like Hykker above, I think "I'm Sorry" may have been played more on AC stations, but it didn't receive a lot of play on the pop stations I listened to. Not like "Calypso" did. I think Mr. Whitburn's earlier publications with the #2 peak for "Calypso" are more accurate than his newest ones without any chart peak and just a tag-a-logn B-side. It was much more than that. And I think Mr. Whitburn should go back to the way he used to list it, as I think that's more accurate.
And I have to agree with all the other members above that "Calypso" is a much stronger (and more memorable) song than "I'm Sorry". I'm sorry - but that's how I feel.
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Paul Haney
MusicFan
Joined: 01 April 2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1743
|
| Posted: 14 June 2013 at 11:04am | IP Logged
|
|
|
We can't discount Jim's info above about "I'm Sorry" being listed on way more radio station surveys than "Calypso" (about 3-to-1). At the very least, it's safe to say that "Calypso" didn't start getting major airplay until after "I'm Sorry" had peaked. It's a shame that "Calypso" wasn't released as a follow-up on it's own as it probably would've been a decent-size hit (but I don't think #2 - probably closer to Cash Box's #26). Alas, we'll never know for sure.
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Brian W.
MusicFan
Joined: 13 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2507
|
| Posted: 14 June 2013 at 2:08pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
EdisonLite wrote:
| I just want to add one more comment to my one above. I mentioned hearing "Calypso" a lot. What I didn't mention is that I didn't hear "I'm Sorry" nearly as much. Like Hykker above, I think "I'm Sorry" may have been played more on AC stations, but it didn't receive a lot of play on the pop stations I listened to. Not like "Calypso" did. |
|
|
I will "third" that. My mother listened to KJR Seattle, the main Top 40 station in that city, every single morning, and I can't really recall hearing "I'm Sorry," but I remember "Calypso" VERY well. I just Googled old playlists for KJR and didn't really come up with anything.
Radio & Records listed both at one position and ranked it as #1. Sure wish they had divided them into separate songs.
http://wweb.uta.edu/faculty/gghunt/charts/jdenver.html
Looks like it had a really low peak in Cash Box, though -- #26 on 11/22/75.
Edited by Brian W. on 14 June 2013 at 2:14pm
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Brian W.
MusicFan
Joined: 13 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2507
|
| Posted: 14 June 2013 at 2:16pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
AndrewChouffi wrote:
It's always been hard to assign a chart position to a double-sided hit because each side sells the exact same amount of copies!
|
|
|
Yes, and each magazine had a different method of ranking them. Did anyone else who bought the recent "Record World" book notice that The Beatles' "Revolution" was ranked at NUMBER TWO in "Record World"?
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
jimct
MusicFan
Joined: 07 April 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3906
|
| Posted: 14 June 2013 at 2:33pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Paul, it looks like it's Mr. Whitburn, you and I against the world! I think Mr.
Whitburn should keep "Calypso" the way he has it now.
I can only pray that someday I will be able to agree with my friend Gordon,
on *some* issue on this board. I always seem to take the exact opposite
stance, on song after song, and issue after issue. It's uncanny. And then I
always end up giving a ultra-successful, award-winning songwriter agita.
Once again. :( Unlike the others here, I did hear "I'm Sorry" far more on
1975 radio than I did "Calypso." Not even close. And not just on AC
stations. Denver was a *Top 10 hit machine* in 1974 and 1975. He, Elton
John, and ONJ come to mind as the three "superstars" of Top 40 radio
during that 2-year window.
All I know for sure is that here on T4MOC, Pat has the final say. At RR, Mr.
Whitburn has the final say. They are the bosses. We're not. All we can do
is to offer an opinion. Gordon, I believe both we and several others on
Pat's board have just done so. Enjoy your weekend!
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
The Hits Man
MusicFan
Joined: 04 February 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 665
|
| Posted: 14 June 2013 at 4:08pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
All I can add is that here in AZ, "Calypso" was in heavy
rotation in the fall of 1975, perhaps a bit more so that
"I'm Sorry".
__________________
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Santi Paradoa
MusicFan
Joined: 17 February 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1117
|
| Posted: 14 June 2013 at 7:05pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
All I can add is on the Y-100 playlist (WHYI in the
Miami/Ft. Lauderdale market) for late Oct. 1975 "Calypso"
was listed in the top 10 while "I'm Sorry" never even
showed up on the list of their top 30 songs for the week.
__________________
Santi Paradoa
Miami, Florida
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Active Topics 
Memberlist 
Search 
Help
Register 
Login
Top 40 Music on Compact Disc : Chat Board
Topic: John Denver - "Calypso"
