Author |
|
BillCahill MusicFan
Joined: 13 October 2004 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 164
|
Posted: 19 August 2007 at 1:52pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
I picked up what appears to be a Capitol promo 45 but I'm trying to determine it's actual origins.
It has the correct number and B side. Mono. It has the typical Capitol design of the period, yellow label with black print.
But under the "NOT FOR SALE" print, it says, "Produced by" HIDEOUT RECORDS AND DISTRIBUTORS INC".
Was that also on the stock copies?
The reason I ask is that the artist for this promo is Bob Seger, not the "Bob Seger System".
If it is a radio copy then maybe this 45 was originally released to radio as Bob Seger, and then changed later.
Or, it's not a radio copy, but some promo made up for a state fair or something later when he dropped "The System".
Or, it's a boot and I got tricked.
It's mono. Trail says: 45-59078-F1
Is Hideout on the stock? Does anybody have a promo with System on it? Any clue as to whether or not this is an original or something else?
Bill
|
Back to Top |
|
|
Pat Downey Admin Group
Joined: 01 October 2003
Online Status: Offline Posts: 1742
|
Posted: 19 August 2007 at 2:02pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
My dj copy is identical to the one you are describing Bill. The flip side of mine is "Tales Of Lucy Blue". Capitol 45's in those days had a serrated ridge surrounding the yellow label and mine has that serrated ridge. I doubt a boot would have the serrated ridge.
Edited by Pat Downey on 11 April 2009 at 9:16am
|
Back to Top |
|
|
Gary Mack MusicFan
Joined: 06 February 2006 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 158
|
Posted: 19 August 2007 at 2:50pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Bill,
You apparently have a real promo copy, likely the earliest one.
My stock 45 has the "Hideout" credit line and Bob Seger System. The matrix number is different though; mine reads 45-59078-P1, the P suggesting a later pressing, which would make sense. And Pat's comment about the serrated edge around the label is real proof that yours is a Capitol pressing.
GM
|
Back to Top |
|
|
BillCahill MusicFan
Joined: 13 October 2004 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 164
|
Posted: 20 August 2007 at 5:05am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Yes it has the serrated edge. Thanks for the help guys, not a bad purchase for a buck!
|
Back to Top |
|
|
PaulEschen MusicFan
Joined: 28 December 2006 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 122
|
Posted: 20 August 2007 at 10:16am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Just to divert the theme of this post a little bit, I've tried to fold down the
version of this song from the CD Ramblin' Gamblin' Man to see if I
could get a mono version close to the original 45 version. The version on
the CD (and the tan-colored re-issue 45 for that matter) is electronically
rechanneled for stereo, but it sounds like they simply put the treble in
one channel, and the bass in the other. When I did a simple fold-down
on my computer, and added just a bit of high-end boost, I think it sounds
pretty darn close. Has anyone else tried this?
|
Back to Top |
|
|
Todd Ireland MusicFan
Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 4219
|
Posted: 14 March 2008 at 9:53pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Does anyone have any idea why a Billboard Top 20 smash like "Ramblin' Gamblin' Man", released by a major artist (Bob Seger) on a major label (Capitol) has been next to impossible to find on CD? I mean, for crying out loud, if you can even find a copy of the lone long out-of-print CD containing the song, you not only can expect to shell out over $100 for it, but you also settle for listening to the hit in awful electronically rechanneled stereo!
If "Ramblin' Gamblin' Man" was owned by some other label, I could possibly understand how licensing issues could prevent the song from further CD reissue. But it was released on Capitol just like all of Seger's numerous other hits. So what gives with the song's conspicuous absence on CD, especially in genuine mono or stereo? I was fortunate to see Seger in concert last year here in Pittsburgh and it was a very delightful suprise when he performed "Ramblin' Gamblin' Man" during the show! Evidently, he still thinks enough of the song to perform it in concert nearly 30 years after it's release. So why does it continue to be so elusive in digital? What's the story, Morning Glory?
Edited by Todd Ireland on 14 March 2008 at 9:59pm
|
Back to Top |
|
|
AndrewChouffi MusicFan
Joined: 24 September 2005
Online Status: Offline Posts: 1092
|
Posted: 14 March 2008 at 11:35pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Bob Seger's long-time manager (and some-times record producer) Ed "Punch" Andrews controls (possibly owns) the Seger masters; Capitol can't release/repackage them without Punch's directives.
Andy
|
Back to Top |
|
|
Todd Ireland MusicFan
Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 4219
|
Posted: 18 March 2008 at 9:09pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Thanks for the clarification, Andrew. But this only begs the question... Why is "Punch" Andrews being so stingy about reissuing "Ramblin' Gamblin' Man" on CD?
|
Back to Top |
|
|
AndrewChouffi MusicFan
Joined: 24 September 2005
Online Status: Offline Posts: 1092
|
Posted: 19 March 2008 at 8:10am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Hi Todd,
I of course can't answer your question for "Punch", but I suspect the answer lies somewhere in this...
It seems in the music business when one talented, busy, wealthy individual has control over licensing, it's just not a priority to him (e.g. Allen Klein, Phil Spector, Dave Clark, Bruce Springsteen).
Who knows, now that "Punch" has retired from Kid Rock's managerial position to specifically concentrate on Seger's international touring, there may be some attention turned to Seger's releases. (I believe Seger is the only major artist that has never had a 'box-set' released.)
Andy
|
Back to Top |
|
|
Hykker MusicFan
Joined: 30 October 2007 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 1386
|
Posted: 19 March 2008 at 10:04am | IP Logged
|
|
|
A couple other thoughts:
Could there be licensing/tape ownership issues here? I don't think Seger was continuously signed to Capitol. RGM was on Capitol, but I have a couple early 70s singles of his on small, obscure labels, then by mid-decade he was back with Capitol. Could it be that "Punch" doesn't own/control the tapes to this?
Another (somewhat related) thought. The only copy I have of RGM is the Capitol reissue single in muddy-tinny fake stereo. It sounds awful. This would also point to maybe a missing early-generation tape or the multitracks (recorded in '68...there must have been multis at one time).
|
Back to Top |
|
|
Yah Shure MusicFan
Joined: 11 December 2007 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 1317
|
Posted: 19 March 2008 at 4:03pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
That Star Line 45 reissue is indeed awful. The drum intro on "RGM" was (and still is) my favorite part of the record. It just leaps out on the original 45. I've never heard any subsequent release that has that same crackling energy that really drives the song.
|
Back to Top |
|
|
TomDiehl1 MusicFan
Joined: 13 January 2006 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 719
|
Posted: 19 March 2008 at 9:20pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Punch Andrews has in his posession, the original 8 track session tape for RGM, and i've been told this by a source within the music industry who knows Punch. He also has the multi's for all of the other early material that appeared on cameo/parkway and all those other various early labels, as well....however it may be that they dont control the copyrights on the recordings, but just retain posession of the session masters (the record companies wouldve only licensed/purchased mixdown masters, not the original session tapes, unless he was signed to the label exclusively before they were recorded).
__________________ Live in stereo.
|
Back to Top |
|
|
jimct MusicFan
Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 3906
|
Posted: 11 June 2008 at 2:31pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
My commercial 45, which is mono, confirmed as Capitol 2297, and looks exactly like Yah Shure's scan above, has a listed time of (2:20), but an actual time of (2:23). Addressing a couple of earlier-in-this-thread queries, "The Hideout" was a popular, 60's Detroit nighttime hangout & local band performance venue. They also operated the small "Hideout" independent, local record label, circa 1965-67, and issued some local singles by the club's most popular regular acts, most notably "The Underdogs". I believe that Andrews was a primary mover/shaker in all facets of the "Hideout Records & Distributors" operation, including the leasing some of this music to the major labels, when they were interested, as was the case with Seger, and is no doubt why the notation appears on the 45. As to why Seger's earlier Capitol music is so hard to find on CD, my information does not really put the blame on Punch Andrews' wishes; amazingly, he and Seger have almost always been on the "exact same page", for more than 40 years now. My understanding is that Seger himself does not look back at all fondly on almost all of his pre-1975 recorded output, which he has owned the rights to for some years now. So, with one or two exceptions, like "Beautiful Loser" and, more recently "Smokin' OP's", he prefers to keep these albums out of print, simply because he can. I think a good part of it has to do with those album's poor sound quality. I do own a hard-to-find, issued-back-in-the-80s, Capitol CD copy of "Ramblin' Gamblin' Man", and it sounds absolutely horrible. The made-earlier-in-the-thread point about the electronic-stereo nonsense is 100% true, and the sound quality of the "Ramblin' Gamblin' Man" track falls way, way short on there, when compared to the 45. Whoever would've thought that a Punch Andrews-produced LP would lack punch? (sorry)....
Edited by jimct on 11 June 2008 at 2:34pm
|
Back to Top |
|
|
TomDiehl1 MusicFan
Joined: 13 January 2006 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 719
|
Posted: 06 April 2009 at 11:29pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Has anyone else figured out why the promo listed the artist as just Bob Seger? I too now have a nice clean promo copy (in better condition than my stock copy, even)...it definitely is original, cost me a bit more than i wanted though, but i am glad to have found it.
__________________ Live in stereo.
|
Back to Top |
|
|
edtop40 MusicFan
Joined: 29 October 2004 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 4996
|
Posted: 05 August 2011 at 4:54pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
i just listened to my commercial 45 versus the cd version from
(E) (2:20) Capitol 96261 Ramblin' Gamblin' Man (LP version)
there are 3 differences that i can discern....
first is the 45 is mono versus what i guess is a fold-down on the cd version...the difference is most noticible while listening with headphones...
second the commercial 45 runs about 0:02 longer than the version from the cd
third, the cd version is slightly FASTER than the vinyl 45 (45 runs 2:23 and the cd runs 2:20)
other than these outlined, what would be the reasons for the "lp version" qualifier in the db.........if you can listen thru the distored fold down version, they are very much alike.....
Edited by edtop40 on 05 August 2011 at 4:54pm
__________________ edtop40
|
Back to Top |
|
|
MMathews MusicFan
Joined: 18 August 2005 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 978
|
Posted: 05 August 2011 at 6:19pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Ed,
i'm not totally sure, but i think the "version" qualifies because the LP version was electronically enhanced to the fake stereo with added reverb.
And, yeah, as had been stated besides the electronic enhancement, they also EQ'd it so poorly that it sounds LIFELESS on the album. What an embarrassing shame that is.
So, the mono 45 mix was never folded down from that LP mix, the LP "mix" was made later by adding something...hence "version".
And, as had been described above, you CAN successfully repair the version on CD, with a complete re-master. It works best to use only one channel, the one with less added reverb. Then massively RE-EQ it with way more bass, a a lot more upper hi-end...then compress it until the beat slams so hard your foot can't help stomping.
That should do it.
-MM
|
Back to Top |
|
|
Bill Cahill MusicFan
Joined: 27 June 2005 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 595
|
Posted: 20 October 2011 at 1:26pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
This song will finally be issued in it's original MONO state on the new Bob Seger double CD Ultimate Hits.
|
Back to Top |
|
|
Santi Paradoa MusicFan
Joined: 17 February 2009 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 1117
|
Posted: 20 October 2011 at 8:20pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
That's great news Bill. There are still a few more of Bob's hit 45 versions that have not been on CD yet.
__________________ Santi Paradoa
Miami, Florida
|
Back to Top |
|
|
SoCalDrew MusicFan
Joined: 14 July 2007 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 32
|
Posted: 21 October 2011 at 7:35am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Tracklisting:
Disc 1: Old Time Rock and Roll, Hollywood Nights, Night
Moves, Mainstreet, Roll Me Away, Turn the Page, Her
Strut, Still the Same, You'll Accomp'ny Me, We've Got
Tonight, Like a Rock, Fire Lake, Tryin' to Live My Life
Without You
Disc 2: Rock and Roll Never Forgets, Against the Wind,
Ramblin' Gamblin' Man, The Fire Down Below, Travelin' Man
(Live), Beautiful Loser (Live), Shakedown, Shame on the
Moon, Katmandu, Little Drummer Boy, Wait For Me, Hey Hey
Hey Hey (Going Back to Birmingham) (New in 2011),
Downtown Train (New in 2011)
Edited by SoCalDrew on 21 October 2011 at 7:38am
|
Back to Top |
|
|
Santi Paradoa MusicFan
Joined: 17 February 2009 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 1117
|
Posted: 20 November 2011 at 8:39am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Bill Cahill wrote:
This song will finally be issued in it's original MONO state on the new Bob Seger double CD Ultimate Hits. |
|
|
I see Best Buy has this advertised for $6.99 and available tomorrow.
__________________ Santi Paradoa
Miami, Florida
|
Back to Top |
|
|