| Author |
|
Brian W.
MusicFan
Joined: 13 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2507
|
| Posted: 18 May 2005 at 2:47am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Pat, you list "Return to Sender" on the old RCA Elvis "The Top Ten Hits" as being stereo... but to my ears it's (E), not narrow stereo. I tried to widen it with Magix, and it really doesn't widen. Are you sure this is narrow stereo and not (E)? And anyone else who owns the disc want to chime in on this?
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
davidclark
MusicFan
Joined: 17 November 2004
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1100
|
| Posted: 18 May 2005 at 5:00am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Hi Brian,
I remember when that disc came out, how disappointed I was with the "remix" of that particular track. In my database, I label RTS as a remix, although I hate it and NEVER play it. Just my comment.
Edited by davidclark on 18 May 2005 at 5:00am
__________________
dc1
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Todd Ireland
MusicFan
Joined: 16 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4219
|
| Posted: 18 May 2005 at 11:10pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
I have the Elvis Top Ten Hits CD and have listened to "Return to Sender" on headphones and on my Adobe Audition software. I can't say I really detect any use of phasing, delayed echo in one channel, or other characteristics that typify an electronically rechaneled stereo (E) recording. Are there specific passages or points in the song, Brian, where you think (E) artifacts are most evident?
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Brian W.
MusicFan
Joined: 13 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2507
|
| Posted: 19 May 2005 at 12:17am | IP Logged
|
|
|
I'm just not hearing STEREO. Pat has it listed as stereo, but I'm not really hearing any stereo separation at all. But there seems to be a bit of a spread to it rather than straight, dead-center mono.
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Active Topics 
Memberlist 
Search 
Help
Register 
Login
Top 40 Music on Compact Disc : Chat Board
Topic: Return to Sender on "Top Tens" - S or E?
