Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
Chat Board
 Top 40 Music on Compact Disc : Chat Board
Subject Topic: Abba - The Name Of The Game Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
aaronk
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6513
Posted: 25 October 2007 at 11:12pm | IP Logged Quote aaronk

While the song comment says that DJ copies run (3:52), there are several database CDs that all run (3:57). Can anyone confirm that the actual run time of Abba's "The Name Of The Game" is 3:57?
Back to Top View aaronk's Profile Search for other posts by aaronk Visit aaronk's Homepage
 
jimct
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 07 April 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3906
Posted: 26 October 2007 at 11:20am | IP Logged Quote jimct

Aaron, my promo 45 has both a listed and actual time of (3:52).
Back to Top View jimct's Profile Search for other posts by jimct
 
eriejwg
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 10 June 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3509
Posted: 26 October 2007 at 12:17pm | IP Logged Quote eriejwg

My copy from the Millennium Collection runs about 3:57.
Back to Top View eriejwg's Profile Search for other posts by eriejwg Visit eriejwg's Homepage
 
sriv94
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 16 September 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1455
Posted: 26 October 2007 at 1:13pm | IP Logged Quote sriv94

Is the difference the length of fadeout at the end, or is the edit improper?

Or both of the above?

__________________
Doug
---------------
All of the good signatures have been taken.
Back to Top View sriv94's Profile Search for other posts by sriv94
 
aaronk
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6513
Posted: 26 October 2007 at 2:25pm | IP Logged Quote aaronk

Or perhaps it's an issue with the pitch. I'll try to work with Jim to resolve this :05 difference.
Back to Top View aaronk's Profile Search for other posts by aaronk Visit aaronk's Homepage
 
eriejwg
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 10 June 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3509
Posted: 26 October 2007 at 3:47pm | IP Logged Quote eriejwg

My guess is the 3:52 time that Jim supplied for his 45 is an earlier fade than the CD's in the database.

Jim, do you have a stock 45 you can time?
Back to Top View eriejwg's Profile Search for other posts by eriejwg Visit eriejwg's Homepage
 
sriv94
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 16 September 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1455
Posted: 26 October 2007 at 5:11pm | IP Logged Quote sriv94

According to Pat's database, all stock 45s were the long (4:50+) version.

__________________
Doug
---------------
All of the good signatures have been taken.
Back to Top View sriv94's Profile Search for other posts by sriv94
 
jimct
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 07 April 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3906
Posted: 26 October 2007 at 5:12pm | IP Logged Quote jimct

**Doug beat me by ONE minute!!** John, as Aaron mentioned in his initial post, the question here refers to the DJ, PROMO 45 short version's exact time. The stock 45 version runs almost (5:00), and is, quite frankly, completely irrelevant to Aaron's initial question. As you've no doubt observed by now, offering up gut feelings, speculation, flat-out guesses or thoeries about what MIGHT be causing these timings differences doesn't really help us answer the question at hand - anyone can have an opinion. What we're REALLY looking for here is solid, factual information, using the actual vinyl and CD sources in question. A great many of us here on the Board have LONG ago learned not to trust ANY timing details until we've confirmed them ourselves. And now that Aaron knows that the (3:52) listed DJ 45 time is accurate, the next step is for him to put it under his "audio comparison microscope". To compare/contrast the DJ 45 wave forms, vs. the CD's. But this is time consuming, and Aaron only wanted to spend the time on it if he was certain that there was an ACTUAL time difference, which he now knows there is. I'm amazed, every day, at the accuracy level of the many, many specific details offered up on the Board. There are hardly ANY typos among our posters; have you noticed this? We are fanatics for correct details. Not perfect, but VERY detail oriented.

Edited by jimct on 26 October 2007 at 5:12pm
Back to Top View jimct's Profile Search for other posts by jimct
 
eriejwg
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 10 June 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3509
Posted: 26 October 2007 at 6:39pm | IP Logged Quote eriejwg

Not an issue, Jim. Thanks for the clarification. As usual, I didn't check the database first when asking about the stock version. DOH!

Being at my first commercial radio job in '77, I know we played the song off a stock 45 then, just sure didn't seem almost 5:00 then.
Back to Top View eriejwg's Profile Search for other posts by eriejwg Visit eriejwg's Homepage
 
edtop40
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 29 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4996
Posted: 01 November 2007 at 5:54pm | IP Logged Quote edtop40

my commercial 45, issued as atlantic 3449, states a run time of 4:53, but actually runs 4:51 like many of the entries in the db.....this should be noted....

__________________
edtop40
Back to Top View edtop40's Profile Search for other posts by edtop40
 
Todd Ireland
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 16 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4219
Posted: 19 May 2008 at 4:54pm | IP Logged Quote Todd Ireland

Thanks to assistance from my good friend Aaron, I've officially determined the 3:57 version of "The Name of the Game" appearing on ABBA's Best of: 20th Century Masters - The Millennium Collection CD is indeed the DJ 45 version but :05 longer. So at long last we can put this one to rest! Pat, since there've been a number of inquiries about this promo 45 version on CD, I'm thinking it might not be a bad idea to individually note which CDs in the database run :05 longer than the DJ 45.
Back to Top View Todd Ireland's Profile Search for other posts by Todd Ireland
 
aaronk
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6513
Posted: 19 May 2008 at 10:26pm | IP Logged Quote aaronk

To provide further info, the promo 45 has one edit at the 2:03 mark and fades about :05 earlier than the longer version's fade. I'd be very curious to know how some of these slightly longer versions surface on CD. Is it possible that the engineer was instructed to fade it a little early as it was being recorded to the master stamper, hence a master tape with the correct length never really exists?
Back to Top View aaronk's Profile Search for other posts by aaronk Visit aaronk's Homepage
 
Todd Ireland
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 16 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4219
Posted: 20 May 2008 at 6:51am | IP Logged Quote Todd Ireland

I've wondered these very same questions myself, Aaron, because so often the fades at the end of 45 versions appearing on CD do not exactly match the fades on their respective vinyl 45 counterparts. Do the single masters usually contain the exact fade heard on their commercial single releases? Or do many single version masters come with fading instructions for engineers to manually perform when mastering for CD? Perhaps one of our resident audio engineer experts can help us answer this.
Back to Top View Todd Ireland's Profile Search for other posts by Todd Ireland
 
eriejwg
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 10 June 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3509
Posted: 20 May 2008 at 7:58am | IP Logged Quote eriejwg

Is the edit you mentioned, Aaron, what brings the LP version down to it's 3:57 CD length, albeit that the 3:57 versions fade later than the promo 45?
Back to Top View eriejwg's Profile Search for other posts by eriejwg Visit eriejwg's Homepage
 
aaronk
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6513
Posted: 20 May 2008 at 11:08am | IP Logged Quote aaronk

Yes, if you make the one edit to the LP version but don't perform an early fade, you get very close to 3:57.
Back to Top View aaronk's Profile Search for other posts by aaronk Visit aaronk's Homepage
 
JL328
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 06 May 2011
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 198
Posted: 29 May 2017 at 12:08pm | IP Logged Quote JL328

Does anybody know where the fade starts on the true 3:52 promo
version? Does it start earlier than it does on the 3:57 cd versions or is
the fadeout just elongated on those cd versions? Thanks.
Back to Top View JL328's Profile Search for other posts by JL328
 
Yah Shure
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 11 December 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1317
Posted: 03 June 2017 at 2:03pm | IP Logged Quote Yah Shure

JL, the fade starts at 3:39.264 and runs until 3:53.374, a total of 14.11 seconds. The final 2.4 seconds is barely audible.
Back to Top View Yah Shure's Profile Search for other posts by Yah Shure
 

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login
If you are not already registered you must first register

  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 0.0664 seconds.