Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
Chat Board
 Top 40 Music on Compact Disc : Chat Board
Subject Topic: Rolling Stones - Beast Of Burden Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
aaronk
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6513
Posted: 27 October 2007 at 1:25am | IP Logged Quote aaronk
The comment for Rolling Stones' "Beast Of Burden" says that DJ copies run (3:20). While there are no notations next to the CDs, several discs run (3:26) or (3:27). Is this the DJ edit but longer, or is the printed time on the DJ 45 wrong?
Back to Top View aaronk's Profile Search for other posts by aaronk Visit aaronk's Homepage
 
jimct
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 07 April 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3906
Posted: 27 October 2007 at 8:36am | IP Logged Quote jimct
Aaron, my promo 45 has a listed time of (3:20) and an actual time of (3:21).
Back to Top View jimct's Profile Search for other posts by jimct
 
aaronk
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6513
Posted: 27 October 2007 at 9:28pm | IP Logged Quote aaronk
Thanks, Jim. It looks like we'll have to get to the bottom of the :05 difference between your vinyl promo and the CD versions.
Back to Top View aaronk's Profile Search for other posts by aaronk Visit aaronk's Homepage
 
eriejwg
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 10 June 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3509
Posted: 28 October 2008 at 6:54pm | IP Logged Quote eriejwg
Aaron, were you able to determine what the :05 difference was? Speed, length or edit?
Back to Top View eriejwg's Profile Search for other posts by eriejwg Visit eriejwg's Homepage
 
aaronk
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6513
Posted: 29 October 2008 at 12:54am | IP Logged Quote aaronk
Honestly, I don't think we ever went any further than just talking about it on this thread! I'll catch up with Jim in the near future, unless someone else comes to the rescue.
Back to Top View aaronk's Profile Search for other posts by aaronk Visit aaronk's Homepage
 
eriejwg
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 10 June 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3509
Posted: 27 January 2011 at 5:25pm | IP Logged Quote eriejwg
Bringing this one back, since it was never determined what the :05 difference was.
Back to Top View eriejwg's Profile Search for other posts by eriejwg Visit eriejwg's Homepage
 
eriejwg
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 10 June 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3509
Posted: 01 February 2011 at 10:25am | IP Logged Quote eriejwg
I've got a promo 45 on order, so hopefully I can report back on the fade of the short version.
Back to Top View eriejwg's Profile Search for other posts by eriejwg Visit eriejwg's Homepage
 
eriejwg
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 10 June 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3509
Posted: 04 February 2011 at 1:55pm | IP Logged Quote eriejwg
Just got in the promo I ordered. The 'short version' has a listed time of 3:20, actual time of 3:22. The promo 45 runs about .8% slower than the digital copy I have from Sucking In The Seventies. The fade on the promo starts at 3:06 and ends completely on "are hurtin'.
Back to Top View eriejwg's Profile Search for other posts by eriejwg Visit eriejwg's Homepage
 

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login
If you are not already registered you must first register

  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 0.0527 seconds.