Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
Chat Board
 Top 40 Music on Compact Disc : Chat Board
Subject Topic: "Precious and Few" - Climax Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
Todd Ireland
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 16 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4219
Posted: 22 February 2012 at 4:22pm | IP Logged Quote Todd Ireland
Commercial 45 copies of Climax's "Precious and Few" are in mono and have an actual run time of 2:44. (Thanks once again to Jim for supplying the timing info. The printed label time is 2:43.) I only pass this along because the song's database CD appearances run from 2:41-2:46.
Back to Top View Todd Ireland's Profile Search for other posts by Todd Ireland
 
The Hits Man
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 04 February 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 665
Posted: 22 February 2012 at 5:23pm | IP Logged Quote The Hits Man
Also, there seems to be a slight mix difference in the mono
single mix.

__________________
Back to Top View The Hits Man's Profile Search for other posts by The Hits Man
 
Todd Ireland
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 16 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4219
Posted: 24 February 2012 at 12:33am | IP Logged Quote Todd Ireland
Hits Man:

Can you please elaborate a little more on the specific difference you're hearing between the stereo mix and the 2:44 mono 45 mix?
Back to Top View Todd Ireland's Profile Search for other posts by Todd Ireland
 
The Hits Man
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 04 February 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 665
Posted: 24 February 2012 at 8:31am | IP Logged Quote The Hits Man
The string and horns are lower in volume. It's small
things like that that make a difference in the overall
sound and feel of a song.

__________________
Back to Top View The Hits Man's Profile Search for other posts by The Hits Man
 
KentT
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 25 May 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 650
Posted: 24 February 2012 at 9:03pm | IP Logged Quote KentT
And there is an early reissue 45 of this track on Flashback. It uses the old mono Carousel stamper.

__________________
I turn up the good and turn down the bad!
Back to Top View KentT's Profile Search for other posts by KentT
 
The Hits Man
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 04 February 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 665
Posted: 25 February 2012 at 3:05pm | IP Logged Quote The Hits Man
KentT wrote:
And there is an early reissue 45 of this
track on Flashback. It uses the old mono Carousel stamper.


I had a later Flashback 45 of it and it was in stereo.

__________________
Back to Top View The Hits Man's Profile Search for other posts by The Hits Man
 
KentT
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 25 May 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 650
Posted: 25 February 2012 at 8:59pm | IP Logged Quote KentT
The Stereo Flashback was likely a bit later pressing than my mono one. Might have used an original Promo Stereo side stamper. Thanks for letting us know about this version. It might be the last one before the masters changed hands. Dominion Music now owns the master to this classic.

__________________
I turn up the good and turn down the bad!
Back to Top View KentT's Profile Search for other posts by KentT
 
Roscoe
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 18 July 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 333
Posted: 25 February 2012 at 9:57pm | IP Logged Quote Roscoe
KentT wrote:
The Stereo Flashback was likely a bit later
pressing than my mono one. Might have used an original
Promo Stereo side stamper. Thanks for letting us know about
this version. It might be the last one before the masters
changed hands. Dominion Music now owns the master to this
classic.


Do you happen to know the matrix number of the mono
Flashback 45? I was browsing gemm.com and there are couple
of different Flashback 45s listed (assuming that one is the
mono version and the other is stereo).
Back to Top View Roscoe's Profile Search for other posts by Roscoe
 
TomDiehl1
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 13 January 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 719
Posted: 26 February 2012 at 12:28am | IP Logged Quote TomDiehl1
KentT wrote:
The Stereo Flashback was likely a bit later pressing than my mono one. Might have used an original Promo Stereo side stamper. Thanks for letting us know about this version. It might be the last one before the masters changed hands. Dominion Music now owns the master to this classic.


My promo copy is mono/mono. I would be interested to know if a mono/stereo promo exists.

__________________
Live in stereo.
Back to Top View TomDiehl1's Profile Search for other posts by TomDiehl1 Visit TomDiehl1's Homepage
 
PaulEschen
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 28 December 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 122
Posted: 26 February 2012 at 7:23am | IP Logged Quote PaulEschen
My Flashback mono 45 (FLB 69) has an inner ring number of Bell-9987-1-1.
Back to Top View PaulEschen's Profile Search for other posts by PaulEschen
 
KentT
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 25 May 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 650
Posted: 04 March 2012 at 7:52pm | IP Logged Quote KentT
And so does my own copy, pre-Arista.

__________________
I turn up the good and turn down the bad!
Back to Top View KentT's Profile Search for other posts by KentT
 
edtop40
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 29 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4996
Posted: 01 February 2013 at 6:47pm | IP Logged Quote edtop40
in my billboard book of top 40 hits, it says that the
climax song 'precious and few' was first released on
carousel 30055, which i have but also states it was
released as rocky road 30055.....i have never seen the
rocky road 45 release.....can anyone confirm that they've
seen or have a copy of the rocky road 30055 vinyl 45?.....

__________________
edtop40
Back to Top View edtop40's Profile Search for other posts by edtop40
 
Paul Haney
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 01 April 2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1742
Posted: 02 February 2013 at 6:32am | IP Logged Quote Paul Haney
edtop40 wrote:
in my billboard book of top 40 hits, it says that the
climax song 'precious and few' was first released on
carousel 30055, which i have but also states it was
released as rocky road 30055.....i have never seen the
rocky road 45 release.....can anyone confirm that they've
seen or have a copy of the rocky road 30055 vinyl 45?.....


Ed, we've since taken that trivia note out of the books. I'd also be curious if anyone has ever seen a copy on Rocky Road. FWIW, Tim Neely does list it in his price guides.
Back to Top View Paul Haney's Profile Search for other posts by Paul Haney
 
eriejwg
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 10 June 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3509
Posted: 02 February 2013 at 9:48am | IP Logged Quote eriejwg
At one time, I owned a Rock Road test pressing for "Life
And Breath", the follow-up to "Precious And Few." I'd
imagine there are pressings for "Precious And Few" on Rocky
Road.

I just did a Google image search and only the Carousel
label came up.
Back to Top View eriejwg's Profile Search for other posts by eriejwg Visit eriejwg's Homepage
 
The Hits Man
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 04 February 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 665
Posted: 07 February 2013 at 7:00pm | IP Logged Quote The Hits Man
According to the entry on the Both Sides now site,
"Precious and Few" was reissued as Rocky Road 30055" when
it became a hit single. First pressings in late 1971
were on the Carousel label.

Apparently, In late 1971 or early 1972, the label was
issued a cease and desist notice for the Carousel name,
so owner Marc Gordon abruptly switched the name to Rocky
Road.

The company folded in 1975, just two years after Al
Wilson's "Show And Tell" was a hit on the label.

The reason the reissue 45 wound up on Arista is because
Rocky Road was distributed by Bell, and that company
morphed into Arista when Clive Davis took the company, as
we know.

Edited by The Hits Man on 07 February 2013 at 7:06pm

__________________
Back to Top View The Hits Man's Profile Search for other posts by The Hits Man
 

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login
If you are not already registered you must first register

  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 0.0654 seconds.