Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
Chat Board
 Top 40 Music on Compact Disc : Chat Board
Subject Topic: pete drake forever Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
edtop40
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 29 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4996
Posted: 23 March 2012 at 1:00pm | IP Logged Quote edtop40

my commercial 45 for the pete drake song "forever" issued
as smash 1888 states the run time on the label as 2:37 but
actually runs 2:38......the question i have is that most of
the whitburn books has the catalog number as smash
1867.....in my ebay travels, i've never seen a smash 1867
issued 45.....is this a typo or is there a second more
elusive vinyl 45 out there.......

__________________
edtop40
Back to Top View edtop40's Profile Search for other posts by edtop40
 
Yah Shure
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 11 December 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1317
Posted: 23 March 2012 at 1:09pm | IP Logged Quote Yah Shure

Ed, "Forever" was issued under both catalog numbers, each with a different "B" side ("Sleep Walk" on 1867 and "Midnight In Amarilla" on 1888.

My stock copy is also on Smash 1888.

Edited by Yah Shure on 23 March 2012 at 1:10pm
Back to Top View Yah Shure's Profile Search for other posts by Yah Shure
 
edtop40
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 29 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4996
Posted: 23 March 2012 at 1:51pm | IP Logged Quote edtop40

yah shure, thanks for the info.....

paul haney......which one is listed in the billboard charts
during it's chart run?........and, can you see if we can
get whitburn's books to list both 45's in the future...

__________________
edtop40
Back to Top View edtop40's Profile Search for other posts by edtop40
 
jimct
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 07 April 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3906
Posted: 23 March 2012 at 2:19pm | IP Logged Quote jimct

Ed, I think I know why Mr. Whitburn listed it the way he has. The Smash
1867 45 was released around Jan. 1964, and this was truly the Top 40 hit.
Quite often in the 60's, labels would "recycle" an old 45's B-side (and less
commonly, an old 45's A-side) for a subsequent 45 release. After all, the
mastering/pressing/stamping process was already completed for these
tracks, making this process both much quicker and far less expensive for
the labels. That's what happened here, Ed. "Midnight In Amarilla" was the
immediate follow-up 45 to "Forever", released in late March 1964. Smash,
for whatever reason, decided to again use "Forever" as this 45's B-side.
Why? Who knows. Perhaps 45 sales for "Forever" were slowing down, and
the label was pondering whether or not to do "one more current 45
pressing run" on it. But by instead opting to add it as the B-side of his
follow-up, retaliers could then also sell Smash 1888 copies to any
remaining customers wanting a "Forever" copy. Therefore, having Mr.
Whitburn also list Smash 1888 as a "hit release" # is technically incorrect -
because it was the "B" side of that 45. But I do agree, Ed - Smash 1888
copies have long been far easier to track down than Smash 1867 has
been.
Back to Top View jimct's Profile Search for other posts by jimct
 
edtop40
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 29 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4996
Posted: 23 March 2012 at 2:49pm | IP Logged Quote edtop40

jim, as always, thanks for the insight!!!....btw, can i
assume the smash 1867 and 1888 versions of "forever" were
identical?

Edited by edtop40 on 23 March 2012 at 2:50pm


__________________
edtop40
Back to Top View edtop40's Profile Search for other posts by edtop40
 
jimct
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 07 April 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3906
Posted: 23 March 2012 at 3:14pm | IP Logged Quote jimct

Just checked both 45s deadwaxes for you: (both machine-stamped)

Smash 1867: YW 30207 1
Smash 1888: YW 30207 2 (for both my copies of this)

To answer your question, Ed: Yes. Aside from the pressing run # difference
(1 vs. 2), the masters #'s appear to be identical.
Back to Top View jimct's Profile Search for other posts by jimct
 
Paul Haney
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 01 April 2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1743
Posted: 24 March 2012 at 3:08am | IP Logged Quote Paul Haney

edtop40 wrote:
yah shure, thanks for the info.....

paul haney......which one is listed in the billboard charts
during it's chart run?........and, can you see if we can
get whitburn's books to list both 45's in the future...


Jim's explanation is spot-on, as usual. For the record, the actual Hot 100 charts did show the 1867 number all the way through the song's chart run.
Back to Top View Paul Haney's Profile Search for other posts by Paul Haney
 
edtop40
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 29 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4996
Posted: 24 March 2012 at 7:27am | IP Logged Quote edtop40

paul, thanks for double checking.....

__________________
edtop40
Back to Top View edtop40's Profile Search for other posts by edtop40
 
Yah Shure
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 11 December 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1317
Posted: 29 March 2012 at 1:57pm | IP Logged Quote Yah Shure

Thanks for providing the better info, Jim! I never noticed I had the "stiff-plus-prior-hit" follow-up before.
Back to Top View Yah Shure's Profile Search for other posts by Yah Shure
 

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login
If you are not already registered you must first register

  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 0.0596 seconds.