Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
Chat Board
 Top 40 Music on Compact Disc : Chat Board
Subject Topic: crazy elephant gimme gimme good lovin Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
edtop40
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 29 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4996
Posted: 11 November 2012 at 8:05am | IP Logged Quote edtop40

my commercial 45 for the crazy elephant song 'gimme gimme
good lovin' issued as bell 763 states the run time on the
label as 2:00.....i see the db qualifies some versions
(stereo) as the lp version while the mono version as '45
version' does anyone know what the differences are between
the 'lp version' and '45 version'?

__________________
edtop40
Back to Top View edtop40's Profile Search for other posts by edtop40
 
AndrewChouffi
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 24 September 2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1092
Posted: 11 November 2012 at 8:53am | IP Logged Quote AndrewChouffi

One thing comes to mind...

The stereo LP is a weaker mix. The lead vocal is somewhat buried & the bass guitar is midrangy & upfront.

The mono 45 is mixed just about right.

Andy
Back to Top View AndrewChouffi's Profile Search for other posts by AndrewChouffi
 
Yah Shure
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 11 December 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1317
Posted: 11 November 2012 at 9:13am | IP Logged Quote Yah Shure

They're different takes, Ed.

The overall impact of the mixes is different, too. The prominent drums and bass on the 45 version give the record a driving rock beat.

Those elements are moved to the background on the stereo LP version, and with the organ pushed to the forefront, "Gimme" takes on a decidedly more bubblegum-y feel.
Back to Top View Yah Shure's Profile Search for other posts by Yah Shure
 
MMathews
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 18 August 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 978
Posted: 11 November 2012 at 1:04pm | IP Logged Quote MMathews

I do have to disagree that they are different takes, i
had synched them years ago to check that - however the
mix is so different i can understand it sounding that
way. The pitch is slower on the 45, and that does change
the "feel" as well.
Besides the organ almost completely mixed out of the 45
except for the break, the 45 also has more reverb on the
vocals, and the 45 has vocal ad-libs audible during the
guitar break that are so low as to be missing from the
stereo.
I agree with Yah Shure's comment about what it did to the
overall style. The mono mix "feels" almost like garage
rock - while the stereo, with drums pushed way out and
the organ turned way up, gave it a bubble-gummy, bouncy
feel. A Shame.
MM


Back to Top View MMathews's Profile Search for other posts by MMathews
 
Yah Shure
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 11 December 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1317
Posted: 11 November 2012 at 2:21pm | IP Logged Quote Yah Shure

MMathews wrote:
I do have to disagree that they are different takes


The vocals are quite similar, but the giveaway is the "whoo!" near the end of the instrumental break. It lasts about twice as long on the 45 as it is does on the LP version.
Back to Top View Yah Shure's Profile Search for other posts by Yah Shure
 
MMathews
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 18 August 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 978
Posted: 11 November 2012 at 5:26pm | IP Logged Quote MMathews

Well, again, i had to synch them several years back for a
friend's project, and synching proved they are indeed the
same take. The "whoo!" is one of the elements they messed
up in the mix, by turning up the vocal track suddenly in
the middle of it. that is why it's shorter in the stereo
mix.
MM
Back to Top View MMathews's Profile Search for other posts by MMathews
 
Yah Shure
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 11 December 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1317
Posted: 11 November 2012 at 8:59pm | IP Logged Quote Yah Shure

Okay, Mark, you've convinced me. :)

At the time Ed made his initial post this morning, I'd always thought it was just a mix difference. But in checking the stereo contents of the Gimme Gimme Good Lovin' LP on the BSN site, the first thing they had to say about it was "The stereo version of "Gimme Gimme Good Lovin'" is a different take from the 45." That was what prompted me to compare the two. Like you said, the speed differences made that job difficult, to the point where the only obvious difference, aside from a few vocal grunts during the break, was the "whoo!"

It was bad enough that a catchy, near-garage rocker ended up mired in a humongous wad of Dubble Bubble, but to then make its signature "whoo!" a whopping 50% less celebratory was so uncalled for. :)
















Back to Top View Yah Shure's Profile Search for other posts by Yah Shure
 

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login
If you are not already registered you must first register

  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 0.0547 seconds.