Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
Chat Board
 Top 40 Music on Compact Disc : Chat Board
Subject Topic: chicago "wishing you were here" Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
edtop40
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 29 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4996
Posted: 13 February 2006 at 9:01pm | IP Logged Quote edtop40
pat

the actual run time of the 45 is 4:34 and NOT 4:26 as stated of the 45's label..

edtop40

__________________
edtop40
Back to Top View edtop40's Profile Search for other posts by edtop40
 
Todd Ireland
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 16 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4219
Posted: 21 February 2012 at 11:59pm | IP Logged Quote Todd Ireland
The database currently states the following general comment for Chicago's "Wishing You Were Here":

(dj copies of this 45 ran (2:54) and (4:26); commercial copies were all (4:34) not (4:26) as stated on the record label)

Given the discrepancy between the printed and actual commercial 45 times, I suspect that the long DJ 45 length of 4:26 is probably the printed label time but not the actual run time. And considering the lone database CD appearance of the short DJ edit runs 2:59, it's very possible the database's listed 2:54 time for the short DJ 45 side is inaccurate as well. So does anyone have a copy of the "Wishing You Were Here" DJ 45 who can report the actual run time of both sides?

Edited by Todd Ireland on 22 February 2012 at 12:03am
Back to Top View Todd Ireland's Profile Search for other posts by Todd Ireland
 
Yah Shure
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 11 December 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1317
Posted: 22 February 2012 at 2:19pm | IP Logged Quote Yah Shure
DJ 45 actual timings:

short version (3:03) (2:54 listed)

long version (4:34) (4:26 listed)

Edited by Yah Shure on 22 February 2012 at 2:22pm
Back to Top View Yah Shure's Profile Search for other posts by Yah Shure
 
Todd Ireland
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 16 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4219
Posted: 22 February 2012 at 3:42pm | IP Logged Quote Todd Ireland
Thanks, Yah Shure!
Back to Top View Todd Ireland's Profile Search for other posts by Todd Ireland
 
Hykker
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 30 October 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1386
Posted: 22 February 2012 at 7:18pm | IP Logged Quote Hykker
Yah Shure wrote:

short version (3:03) (2:54 listed)


Mine timed out to 3:00 exactly.
Back to Top View Hykker's Profile Search for other posts by Hykker
 
Yah Shure
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 11 December 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1317
Posted: 22 February 2012 at 8:13pm | IP Logged Quote Yah Shure
Steve, I just double-checked mine and it still came out to 3:03. That's with the fade-in and fade-out maximized in the wav editor to pinpoint the exact start and end; however, for all practical purposes - i.e. carting it up for radio play in 1974 - 3:00 would be the more realistic figure.

Perhaps there's a difference in the promo pressings. Mine's a Terre Haute copy, although its typical "TI" designation is etched only on the long version side of this one.
Back to Top View Yah Shure's Profile Search for other posts by Yah Shure
 
eriejwg
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 10 June 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3509
Posted: 22 February 2012 at 10:47pm | IP Logged Quote eriejwg
I created a file running 3:03 using the 40th Anniversary
short version and part of the intro/the ending from the
longer version.
Back to Top View eriejwg's Profile Search for other posts by eriejwg Visit eriejwg's Homepage
 
Hykker
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 30 October 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1386
Posted: 24 February 2012 at 6:43am | IP Logged Quote Hykker
Yah Shure wrote:

Perhaps there's a difference in the promo pressings. Mine's a Terre Haute copy, although its typical "TI" designation is etched only on the long version side of this one.


My copy does seem to be from another plant..."short version" is in a different font, and the "black sun" (or whatever that is) is in a different place. Then again since both the surf intro and the sustained ending fade slowly, maybe the :03 difference just gets lost in surface noise (surface noise on a Columbia single...who 'da thunk? ).

Not up on my pressing plant codes, but mine has a TMS-S stamped in the run-out area on the short version side and TMS-M on the long version. Both sides are stereo.
Back to Top View Hykker's Profile Search for other posts by Hykker
 
KentT
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 25 May 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 650
Posted: 26 February 2012 at 7:50am | IP Logged Quote KentT
TMS I think is actually TML (The Mastering Lab) mastering studios in California. S and M are lathe codes. Doug Sax being their best known mastering engineer.

__________________
I turn up the good and turn down the bad!
Back to Top View KentT's Profile Search for other posts by KentT
 

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login
If you are not already registered you must first register

  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 0.0566 seconds.