Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
Chat Board
 Top 40 Music on Compact Disc : Chat Board
Subject Topic: lil mo superwoman question for paul haney Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
edtop40
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 29 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4996
Posted: 19 February 2013 at 7:48pm | IP Logged Quote edtop40

here's one for paul haney at record research regarding the
song superwoman/superwoman pt II by lil mo issued as
eastwest 67171....my top 40 book has both songs as separate
entries...superwoman entered the top 40 on 5-12-01 and
peaked at number 34 for 1 week, then pt II peaked at #11 as
was in the top 40 for 13 weeks.....but...in the hot 100
annual there is no entry in the peak slot of number 34 for
superwoman....why wouldn't that song get it's own
slot....it wasn't just a b-side it was a legitimate a-side
for one week.....any info would be welcomed....

__________________
edtop40
Back to Top View edtop40's Profile Search for other posts by edtop40
 
mstgator
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 06 September 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 98
Posted: 19 February 2013 at 9:07pm | IP Logged Quote mstgator

It looks like Paul anticipated your inquiry Ed, as this was updated in the 8th
edition of Pop Annual (1955-2011), which does have "Superwoman" at #148
for the year (peak position #34).
Back to Top View mstgator's Profile Search for other posts by mstgator
 
aaronk
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Online
Posts: 6513
Posted: 19 February 2013 at 9:22pm | IP Logged Quote aaronk

Ed, if my memory is correct, Part 1 began getting airplay on urban radio
stations, but after a couple weeks, they all started playing Part 2.
Rhythmic CHR stations also played Part 2. Without actually looking at
the weekly Billboard charts during the song's chart run, I'm guessing
this was a case where after it made the top 40, they decided Part 2 was
the bona fide hit version and changed the way it was listed. Therefore,
it wasn't really two separate chart runs for Parts 1 and 2. Hopefully Paul
can confirm, but I'm betting the book with Part 1 listed separately is just
an error.

__________________
Aaron Kannowski
Uptown Sound
91.9 The Peak - Classic Hip Hop
Back to Top View aaronk's Profile Search for other posts by aaronk Visit aaronk's Homepage
 
aaronk
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Online
Posts: 6513
Posted: 19 February 2013 at 9:23pm | IP Logged Quote aaronk

mstgator wrote:
It looks like Paul anticipated your inquiry Ed, as
this was updated in the 8th
edition of Pop Annual (1955-2011), which does have "Superwoman" at
#148
for the year (peak position #34).

And it also looks like I'm completely wrong!

__________________
Aaron Kannowski
Uptown Sound
91.9 The Peak - Classic Hip Hop
Back to Top View aaronk's Profile Search for other posts by aaronk Visit aaronk's Homepage
 
mstgator
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 06 September 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 98
Posted: 20 February 2013 at 6:58pm | IP Logged Quote mstgator

Not completely wrong, Aaron... the chart run does in fact seem to back your
theory. "Superwoman" debuted on the Hot 100 on 3/31/01, and steadily
climbed until reaching #34 in it's 7th week. On the chart of 5/19/01, the
listing was changed to "Superwoman Pt. II" featuring Fabolous (with
songwriters and producers also adjusted) as it climbed to #24, but Billboard
linked its previous weeks' positions and total weeks on to the original.
(Something similar happened on the R&B chart, as "Superwoman" made it as
high as #9 before switching to "Superwoman Pt. II" on 5/19 for the remainder
of its run).

So, it looks like Record Research treated the single as one song in the
previous edition of Hot 100 Annual, and as two separate songs in the
latest edition. Either way could be correct depending on your viewpoint.

(And no, I don't work for Record Research, so I'd also welcome Paul to chime
in with the real inside scoop!)

Edited by mstgator on 20 February 2013 at 7:07pm
Back to Top View mstgator's Profile Search for other posts by mstgator
 

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login
If you are not already registered you must first register

  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 0.0586 seconds.