Author |
|
sriv94 MusicFan
Joined: 16 September 2005 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 1455
|
Posted: 14 June 2016 at 7:43am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Thought there was a thread on this, but danged if I can find it.
Were the 45 and LP of this the same? Discogs shows a listed (4:07) version in both promo and stock form, but all the CD versions I've run across run in the (4:16)-(4:21) range.
Thx!
__________________ Doug
---------------
All of the good signatures have been taken.
|
Back to Top |
|
|
jimct MusicFan
Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 3906
|
Posted: 14 June 2016 at 9:24am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Doug: Both the mono and stereo sides of my 1977 promo 45, confirmed as
WB 8282, feature both listed & actual times of (4:07). I have just shot you out
a dub of my promo 45's stereo side, for your analysis. Could you let us know
if it turns out to be just an early fade of the LPv, or if a brief edit was
present, whenever time allows?
|
Back to Top |
|
|
Plastic Steel MusicFan
Joined: 28 February 2016
Online Status: Offline Posts: 105
|
Posted: 14 June 2016 at 9:52am | IP Logged
|
|
|
I've found that song titles with apostrophes never come back in search results. I usually type in the words *up to* the apostrophe and have pretty good success that way. Or I search by the artist and then find the song I'm looking for from the search returns. (Using a unique search word, like "Doobie," narrows the search results.) Not sure if that's a pro tip or unsolicited advice, but there it is.
I think we're all spoiled by Google.
Edited by Plastic Steel on 14 June 2016 at 5:39pm
|
Back to Top |
|
|
sriv94 MusicFan
Joined: 16 September 2005 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 1455
|
Posted: 14 June 2016 at 6:24pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
I tried a couple of things--not sure whether I used the apostrophe or not. But duly noted.
__________________ Doug
---------------
All of the good signatures have been taken.
|
Back to Top |
|
|