| Author |
|
edtop40
MusicFan
Joined: 29 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4996
|
| Posted: 16 August 2006 at 5:17pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
pat
the db states that all the cd versions are the full cd/lp version indicating the 45 version is different....my cassingle issued as virgin 98900 contains a non-described version which is identical to the full cd/lp version.....do you have the promo 45 as your piont of reference or is this another case of 2 single versions??
__________________
edtop40
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
cmmmbase
MusicFan
Joined: 04 May 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 289
|
| Posted: 16 August 2006 at 7:28pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
you mean promo cd single...no vinyl on this one (in the US anyhow).
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Pat Downey
Admin Group
Joined: 01 October 2003
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1742
|
| Posted: 16 August 2006 at 9:32pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Ed, the dj cd single contains the "single edit" (3:57), the "original single" (4:14) and the "less guitar mix" (4:15) so it is quite a surprise to hear that the cassette single is the same as the LP. It is interesting to note that Joel Whitburn lists the running time as (4:01) so perhaps Paul Haney can jump in and explain the source for the (4:01) running time.
Edited by Pat Downey on 16 August 2006 at 9:53pm
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Paul Haney
MusicFan
Joined: 01 April 2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1743
|
| Posted: 17 August 2006 at 8:01am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Pat Downey wrote:
| It is interesting to note that Joel Whitburn lists the running time as (4:01) so perhaps Paul Haney can jump in and explain the source for the (4:01) running time. |
|
|
I just timed the cassette single and it fades out to (4:13). The fade-out is pretty long, so I guess that explains the (4:01).
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
edtop40
MusicFan
Joined: 29 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4996
|
| Posted: 17 August 2006 at 11:08am | IP Logged
|
|
|
as i've stated before.....almost all cassingles run fast and that would explain why whitburns books have shorter (ie quicker) run times.....after carefully reviewing all cassingle issued between 1989 and 1995 vrs their cd counterparts, my guess would be that 85% of the cassingles i've reviewed run fast.....i WOULD NOT trust whitburns running time during this era......it looks like he timed the actual elapsed run time of the cassingle, but what he didn't do is a/b them to get the true running times of the songs on cd, which is what i'm currently doing....my guess regarding "candy" is that this is an example of what i'm talking about.....if you let the cassingle run versus a timer, it'll probably run about 4:01....
Edited by edtop40 on 17 August 2006 at 11:13am
__________________
edtop40
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Bwci Bo
MusicFan
Joined: 08 August 2013
Location: New Zealand
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 183
|
| Posted: 19 June 2015 at 7:04pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Can anyone provide the edit points to recreate the 3:57 version of Candy, please? Thanks!
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Active Topics 
Memberlist 
Search 
Help
Register 
Login
Top 40 Music on Compact Disc : Chat Board
Topic: iggy pop "candy"
