Top 40 Music on Compact Disc: Sugarloaf - Green-Eyed Lady (DJ edit)

Active Topics

Memberlist

Help

Chat Board
Top 40 Music on Compact Disc : Chat Board

Topic: Sugarloaf - Green-Eyed Lady (DJ edit)

Author

Message

<< Prev Topic | Next Topic >>

eriejwg
MusicFan

Joined: 10 June 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3509

Posted: 26 August 2011 at 11:35am \| IP Logged

Anyone know how to recreate the 2:58 DJ edit for Green-Eyed Lady?

Hykker
MusicFan

Joined: 30 October 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1386

Posted: 28 August 2011 at 5:17pm \| IP Logged

Funny, I never heard this edit during the song's chart run...every station around here (including the one where I was a weekender) played the 3:33 version back in the autumn of 1970. Dunno if the short version was only selectively serviced, or what. First time I heard the edit I thought it was a station edit.

I know there were 2 different stock singles of this, the aforementioned 3:33, and one with a listed time of 5:58 that was essentially the album version faded early.

eriejwg
MusicFan

Joined: 10 June 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3509

Posted: 28 August 2011 at 6:34pm \| IP Logged

Thanks to Steve, I was able to hear a recreation of the DJ edit. You'll need a section of the LP version to complete the DJ edit, as the needed instrumental section isn't in the 45 version.

Thanks, Steve!

bwolfe
MusicFan

Joined: 24 May 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 193

Posted: 29 August 2011 at 9:46am \| IP Logged

I was wondering if it was close to what Dick Bartley has used in the past.
It essentially plays the 45 version then ends with the LP version close.
Maybe it was Bartley's own creation.

__________________
the way it was heard on the radio

Hykker
MusicFan

Joined: 30 October 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1386

Posted: 30 August 2011 at 6:52am \| IP Logged

bwolfe wrote:

I was wondering if it was close to what Dick Bartley has used in the past.
It essentially plays the 45 version then ends with the LP version close.
Maybe it was Bartley's own creation.

Not sure what Bartley uses, but the short promo version had different edits in the intro and bridge than the stock. I don't remember it having a cold ending like the album did.

Bill Cahill
MusicFan

Joined: 27 June 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 595

Posted: 30 August 2011 at 8:52am \| IP Logged

Three DJ 45s were issued, I'm not sure of the order except that the 3:33 was the last one issued. There was the 5:58 version which is an early fade of the LP version. There is the 2:58 version. Then the 3:33 version. That may have been the order released, the longest first, the 2:58 edit second, and finally the 3:33 version.

The 3:33 version sounds like somebody took the 2:58 version, took some of the music out of the the middle but spliced organ/guitar solo back in. This would explain the level change which happens at the splice before the instrumental break, AND the early splice back after the instrumental break, it's a beat early. There is no reason for that last edit, it was obviously a mistake as they spliced back in to the ending of the 2:58 edit, they probably figured it was "close enough" or didn't notice or care.

The 3:33 version often sounded a little out of phase when played in mono, probably from the splicing back in process.

jimct
MusicFan

Joined: 07 April 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3906

Posted: 27 March 2014 at 12:21pm \| IP Logged

Bill, are you absolutely certain that 1970 US Liberty 56183 stock and
promo 45s did exist with a length of (5:58)?

I have been able to confirm the existence of the other two US promo 45
lengths you specify, (2:58) and (3:33). But never a (5:58) US promo 45. Of
course, this doesn't mean one didn't exist. I just can't yet confirm it.

And every single US stock copy that I have ever owned or seen has always
had a listed time of (3:33). I've never found a single US (5:58) stock copy.
And I've been looking for one for years now.

Yesterday, I was able to buy a (5:58) stock 45 copy on eBay. However, it
was a Canadian copy. In fact, the listing said "Canada-only (5:58) 45
length." Now just because a merchant says something, that doesn't make
it true. But his statement does also match my own experience.

Bill, I consider you to be one of the very top authorities here on Pat's
board. Do you happen to own actual US stock/promo (5:58) copies for
"Green-Eyed Lady", or are you going from memory on it? Just curious.

Edited by jimct on 27 March 2014 at 12:23pm

Bill Cahill
MusicFan

Joined: 27 June 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 595

Posted: 27 March 2014 at 2:05pm \| IP Logged

I can't remember now if it was stock or the promo but I think I sent it to Pat Downey, it was on his "want list" at the time. Pat?

Hykker
MusicFan

Joined: 30 October 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1386

Posted: 27 March 2014 at 2:09pm \| IP Logged

jimct wrote:

Bill, I consider you to be one of the very top
authorities here on Pat's
board. Do you happen to own actual US stock/promo (5:58)
copies for
"Green-Eyed Lady", or are you going from memory on it?
Just curious.

I'm not Bill, but I have a stock 5:58 copy that's a U.S.
Liberty release. I can send you a label scan if you'd
like.

jimct
MusicFan

Joined: 07 April 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3906

Posted: 27 March 2014 at 2:12pm \| IP Logged

No, Steve, that's fine. I believe you. Now I guess the only remaining question
is does anyone own an actual US promo 45 that runs (5:58)?

Steve Carras
MusicFan

Joined: 29 July 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 177

Posted: 27 March 2014 at 3:06pm \| IP Logged

Thank you for bringing this up, as I have never to my memory ever heard that promo edit and wonder how it differs, at what point, form the 3:33 hit single edit that we all know and love so well...one of the posters mentioned the middle inmstrumental part otherwise on LP and the 5:58 version only, but what part? I've HEARD the nearly 7 minute long version and there are five edits in the instrumental part, the major one being in the uptempo part of the instrumental organ solo that was spliced into the 3:33 length single which also lacked the immediate post-vocal stop and start and repeat note parts (and the stock 45 also has a shorter segue lead in back to the chorus than the 5:58/6:50 verisons.;)

Still don't know what was removed exactly from the under-3 minute DJ promo or it's aviable to hear (like on YouTube).

__________________
You know you're really older when you think that younger singer Jesse McCartney's related in anyway to former Beatle Paul McCartney.

eriejwg
MusicFan

Joined: 10 June 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3509

Posted: 27 March 2014 at 6:25pm \| IP Logged

I was sent a dub of the promo edit back in 2011. I never
really was a fan of the way it was edited on the promo 45
so I ended up deleting the file I created. I ended up
going with the 3:33 commercial 45 version as my go to copy
of the song.

Steve Carras
MusicFan

Joined: 29 July 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 177

Posted: 29 March 2014 at 10:02pm \| IP Logged

I got the file from Hykker (if he doesn't mind my revealing that it was him) here and it basically even FURTHER cuts the instrumental break then the single but in such a way that it leaves the second stop start early in the break as heard on the 6:50 album & 5:58 early, discontinued single, then it builds up to the fast organ break heard on all other versions (but edited near the end in the hit single) but then goes back to the slow down that goes back into the "Green Eyed Lady" part. I mistakenly thought, as I emailed Hykker back, that the promo edit faded early but checking, it's the same fade, so just two cuts, slightly leaving a brief part as mentioned as heard on the 5:58 and LP 6:50 lengths and only missing on the 3:33 length hit single. Otherwise this DJ and the hit ones (intro, the intact lyrics) are the same. :) [only several times years ago heard this, though I've heard for MANY times on radio the same year (1970)'s "Are You Ready" DJ edit by PG&E, which is a DRASTICALLY changed edit. ;)]

__________________
You know you're really older when you think that younger singer Jesse McCartney's related in anyway to former Beatle Paul McCartney.

Steve Carras
MusicFan

Joined: 29 July 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 177

Posted: 29 March 2014 at 10:03pm \| IP Logged

Steve Carras wrote:

I got the file from Hykker (if he doesn't mind my revealing that it was him) here and it basically even FURTHER cuts the instrumental break than the single but in such a way that it leaves the second stop start early in the break as heard on the 6:50 album & 5:58 early, discontinued single, then it builds up to the fast organ break heard on all other versions (but edited near the end in the hit single) but then goes back to the slow down that goes back into the "Green Eyed Lady" part. I mistakenly thought, as I emailed Hykker back, that the promo edit faded early but checking, it's the same fade, so just two cuts, slightly leaving a brief part as mentioned as heard on the 5:58 and LP 6:50 lengths and only missing on the 3:33 length hit single. Otherwise this DJ and the hit ones (intro, the intact lyrics) are the same. :) [only several times years ago heard this, though I've heard for MANY times on radio the same year (1970)'s "Are You Ready" DJ edit by PG&E, which is a DRASTICALLY changed edit. ;)]

Oh...Most of my hard crashed and I lost the file..please send again..

Edited by Steve Carras on 03 April 2014 at 8:29am

__________________
You know you're really older when you think that younger singer Jesse McCartney's related in anyway to former Beatle Paul McCartney.

Steve Carras
MusicFan

Joined: 29 July 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 177

Posted: 28 February 2021 at 9:30pm \| IP Logged

I got the sedit since, and I lost it agaub when I
accidentally((emoticom >:<) lost it...I stilol have
gcarras@aol,com (*and yes, I am still dyslexic
obviously)

__________________
You know you're really older when you think that younger singer Jesse McCartney's related in anyway to former Beatle Paul McCartney.

garye
MusicFan

Joined: 02 August 2017
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 156

Posted: 02 March 2021 at 3:38pm \| IP Logged

Someone sent me the radio 2:58 edit years ago.
Forget from whom.(had not joined this forum yet)
Pretty bad edit, honestly.
Can see why they replaced it with commercial 45 edit.
Have also never seen the 5:58 promo copy either.

Bill Cahill
MusicFan

Joined: 27 June 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 595

Posted: 03 March 2021 at 5:36am \| IP Logged

Discogs has a pretty exhaustive listing or the song. No evidence of a 5:58 promo. But, radio was serviced a 2:58 / 6:49 DJ copy which I just saw on Discogs.

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login
If you are not already registered you must first register

Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

This page was generated in 0.0625 seconds.