Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
Chat Board
 Top 40 Music on Compact Disc : Chat Board
Subject Topic: "All for You" - Janet Jackson Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
Todd Ireland
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 16 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4219
Posted: 17 August 2013 at 2:02am | IP Logged Quote Todd Ireland

The database currently shows the following general comment for Janet Jackson's "All for You":

(dj copies of this cd single contain the )

This certainly looks like another one of those instances where a technical glitch caused the rest of the comment to get cut off due to quotation marks being present.
Back to Top View Todd Ireland's Profile Search for other posts by Todd Ireland
 
PopArchivist
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 30 June 2018
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1524
Posted: 19 July 2020 at 11:14am | IP Logged Quote PopArchivist

Can anyone identify where the [Intro Edit] comes from? I have a 4:04 that appears official but no idea where it originated from. Is this an official radio edit possibly from the UK?

Starts out with a chica chica sound and the instrumental for a few seconds and then Janet starting the chorus about 7-8 seconds into it.

Edited by PopArchivist on 19 July 2020 at 11:14am


__________________
"I'm a pop archivist, not a chart philosopher, I seek to listen, observe and document the chart position of music."
Back to Top View PopArchivist's Profile Search for other posts by PopArchivist
 
Brian W.
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 13 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2507
Posted: 19 July 2020 at 3:55pm | IP Logged Quote Brian W.

Is there just one "chicka-ahh" at the beginning, or more
than one? Is it just the Radio Edit with everything
before that sliced off? Because that would put it at
4:05.

I went through every entry on Discogs and don't see
anything with a runtime even close to 4:04 except the
Top Heavy Mix.
Back to Top View Brian W.'s Profile Search for other posts by Brian W.
 
PopArchivist
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 30 June 2018
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1524
Posted: 19 July 2020 at 8:11pm | IP Logged Quote PopArchivist

Brian W. wrote:
Is there just one "chicka-ahh" at the beginning, or more
than one? Is it just the Radio Edit with everything
before that sliced off? Because that would put it at
4:05.

I went through every entry on Discogs and don't see
anything with a runtime even close to 4:04 except the
Top Heavy Mix.


Check your PM. Then let me know what you think.

__________________
"I'm a pop archivist, not a chart philosopher, I seek to listen, observe and document the chart position of music."
Back to Top View PopArchivist's Profile Search for other posts by PopArchivist
 
Brian W.
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 13 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2507
Posted: 22 July 2020 at 5:24pm | IP Logged Quote Brian W.

The "Intro Edit" that Rich has is interesting. It runs a
hair slower than the Radio Edit, and also fades a second
or two earlier. Other than that, it appears to be
identical to the Radio Edit, but with everything up to
Janet's "Chicka-ahh" deleted. Not sure what the source
of this is... I can find no reference to it online. The
slight difference in speed is what intrigues me the
most.
Back to Top View Brian W.'s Profile Search for other posts by Brian W.
 

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login
If you are not already registered you must first register

  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 0.0625 seconds.