Author |
|
Pat Downey Admin Group
Joined: 01 October 2003
Online Status: Offline Posts: 1742
|
Posted: 14 April 2018 at 9:09am | IP Logged
|
|
|
I see that the 45 of Duke Of Earl is entered in the database as having 2 pressings, one running (2:24) and the other (2:32) even though the label states (2:22) in both cases. I can verify the shorter version but can anyone verify that there was indeed a longer (2:34) pressing of this 45? And if so can you provide matrix number information?
|
Back to Top |
|
|
KentT MusicFan
Joined: 25 May 2008 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 650
|
Posted: 15 April 2018 at 12:41pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Pat, my copy is a 2:24 copy. It is a Lost-Nite reissue
which actually used Vee-Jay vintage stampers. And happens
to sound very excellent.
Edited by KentT on 28 May 2018 at 7:04am
__________________ I turn up the good and turn down the bad!
|
Back to Top |
|
|
Hykker MusicFan
Joined: 30 October 2007 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 1386
|
Posted: 16 April 2018 at 4:51am | IP Logged
|
|
|
I just checked my somewhat beat-up copy on VeeJay 416, and
it too is the shorter version...actually seemed a bit
shorter than 2:24 but I might have just lost the tail end
in the noise.
|
Back to Top |
|
|
Yah Shure MusicFan
Joined: 11 December 2007 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 1317
|
Posted: 17 April 2018 at 7:37pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
All three of mine run 2:23:
1) Vee-Jay 416 DJ 45, ARP vinyl pressing.
2) Vee-Jay 416 stock 45, Columbia Terre Haute styrene pressing.
3) Oldies 45 21 reissue 45, Monarch styrene pressing.
#1 & #3 are sourced from the same mother cutting. #2 is mastered by Columbia.
|
Back to Top |
|
|