SELECT TOP 750 tblThread.Thread_ID, tblTopic.Topic_ID, tblTopic.Forum_ID, 1 As Unread FROM tblTopic WITH (NOLOCK) , tblThread WITH (NOLOCK) WHERE tblTopic.Topic_ID = tblThread.Topic_ID AND tblThread.Message_date > '20250404 13:41:20' AND tblTopic.Hide = 0 AND tblThread.Hide = 0 ORDER BY tblTopic.Last_Thread_ID DESC;
![]() |
WE ARE EXPIENCING PROBLEMS WITH THE FORUM AND ARE WORKING TO GET THEM RESOLVED. THE SEARCHABLE DATABASE CAN STILL BE ACCESSED FROM THE HOME PAGE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE. |
"65 Love Affair" - Paul Davis |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12 |
Author | |
crapfromthepast ![]() MusicFan ![]() Joined: 14 September 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I use Rock On 1982 for the 45 length, and the 2-CD Forever '80s for the LP length.
Note that both of these run essentially the same speed as the 45, as do the digital clones of Forever '80s and the Razor & Tie Paul Davis collection Sweet Life His Greatest Hit Singles (1999). So far, I haven't seen any evidence that the LP really runs slower than the 45. I'll be happy to analyze a good needledrop of the LP version and post my findings here. Edited by crapfromthepast |
|
There's a lot of crap on the radio, but there's only one Crap From The Past.
|
|
![]() |
|
crapfromthepast ![]() MusicFan ![]() Joined: 14 September 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Just realized that I hadn't posted the speed of the Sweet Life disc - it's 156.4 BPM, just like Forever '80s. (Not the same analog transfer, though, and a bit more compressed/limited than Forever.)
|
|
There's a lot of crap on the radio, but there's only one Crap From The Past.
|
|
![]() |
|
Ringmaster_D ![]() MusicFan ![]() Joined: 08 July 2010 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I took a listen to the three copies of this tune that
Ron sent out and compared their frequencies. My preference is Forever 80s which has slightly more emphasis on the highs and lows than Rock On. Now Sweet Life is another story. Besides being compressed to death, it also suffers from lack of high frequencies (about 5-10 dB reduction) leaving the track sounding muffled and unpleasant. Although this song will never be a sonic marvel, perhaps it would be a good candidate to see what life could be squeezed out of the master tape for a future Hard To Find volume. Calling Mark... Edited by Ringmaster_D |
|
![]() |
|
EdisonLite ![]() MusicFan ![]() Joined: 18 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yeah, I've found this song to be muffled on all CDs I have, so I remastered it to be much brighter. (However, I also add compression - I don't brickwall it like today's CDs - but it's got more compression than what I think most people on this board prefer). Still, it can be mastered to sound a lot clearer than the CDs out there. (And btw, I don't recall "Cool Night" and "Love Or Let Me Lonely", both top 40 hits from the same Paul Davis CD) to be nearly as muffled. Strange that whoever mastered the original album tapes made this song particularly muffled (maybe, since it reflects on the mid '60s, they were going from an AM transistor sound, like Rapsberries "Go All The Way").
I pulled it from the K-Tel release of the Paul Davis CD, added about 4 dB of bass, subtracted 2dB of Midrange (that's where the muffled quality really was), and added about 2.5 to 3 dB of treble. |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12 |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |