https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/ Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Wed, 22 Apr 2026 08:46:32 +0000 Sun, 15 Jul 2018 11:28:54 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 12.07 360 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=176 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum//images/Top-40-Music-on-CD-Forum-Logo.png https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/ https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=176&PID=49703&title=one-for-the-mockingbird-cutting-crew#49703 Author: eriejwg
Subject: 176
Posted: 15 July 2018 at 11:28am

Ron (crapfromthepast) mentioned this in another post
above..

"...very long fade at a downbeat at 3:41 and has a roughly
64-beat sinusoidal fade that would end on a downbeat
around 4:07, if the track lasted that long." ]]> Sun, 15 Jul 2018 11:28:54 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=176&PID=49703&title=one-for-the-mockingbird-cutting-crew#49703 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=176&PID=49701&title=one-for-the-mockingbird-cutting-crew#49701 Author: PopArchivist
Subject: 176
Posted: 15 July 2018 at 11:16am

Been trying to track this song down, all I can find is the 4:23 version on CD. Is the 4:05 available on CD anywhere? If you can recreate it, do you just fade early? I was sort of confused by the thread. Thanks in advance.

Edited by PopArchivist]]> Sun, 15 Jul 2018 11:16:52 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=176&PID=49701&title=one-for-the-mockingbird-cutting-crew#49701 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=176&PID=20625&title=one-for-the-mockingbird-cutting-crew#20625 Author: abagon
Subject: 176
Posted: 20 January 2009 at 7:13am

Pat: I think that the comment for the CD of the "U.S. mix, LP length" is proper. However, the comments for CDs of the "U.K. mix, LP length" are not appropriate, because the U.K. mix 45 length records don't exist in the U.S. (The U.S. commercial 45 is the "U.S. mix, 45 length".) The comments for CDs of the "U.K. mix, LP length" should be changed to "U.K. LP mix". Thanks.

F.Y.I.
I have the U.K. 12" of this song. This 12" contains 2 versions. One is the extended version, another is the U.S. mix runs "4:18." (U.K. chart peak pos.#52 on Mar. 1987) Probably the U.S. mix "Broadcast" LP was released on Feb. 1987 in the U.S. It seems that the Siren Records (U.K.) reimported the U.S. mix source of the "One for the Mockingbird"

Additions: "(I just) Died In Your Arms" (U.K. chart peak pos.#4 on Aug. 1986), "I've Been In Love Before" (U.K. chart peak pos.#31 on Oct. 1986, #70 on Jan 1987 (re-entry), and #24 Nov. 1987 as Re-mix.)

--abagon

Edited by abagon]]> Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:13:31 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=176&PID=20625&title=one-for-the-mockingbird-cutting-crew#20625 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=176&PID=20612&title=one-for-the-mockingbird-cutting-crew#20612 Author: Pat Downey
Subject: 176
Posted: 19 January 2009 at 5:58pm

Let me note that I have a dj vinyl 45 issue of "One For The Mockingbird" and I bring this up as CFTP indicates above that there may not have been a dj issued on this title. The dj is the same as the commercial 45 (U.S. mix) and of course has the same matrix number ST-VR 51251-SP.

I have updated the database with what I hope are clearer comments regarding the cd issues of this song. ]]> Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:58:24 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=176&PID=20612&title=one-for-the-mockingbird-cutting-crew#20612 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=176&PID=20578&title=one-for-the-mockingbird-cutting-crew#20578 Author: aaronk
Subject: 176
Posted: 15 January 2009 at 11:19pm

I know, this is a very tricky one. Well, the "LP version" should definitely be the remixed version, since it appears on both the CD and vinyl. Unless someone can present evidence of the non-remixed version showing up on vinyl, apparently the non-remixed (UK LP mix) version was only released on CD in the US.]]> Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:19:52 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=176&PID=20578&title=one-for-the-mockingbird-cutting-crew#20578 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=176&PID=20576&title=one-for-the-mockingbird-cutting-crew#20576 Author: Pat Downey
Subject: 176
Posted: 15 January 2009 at 10:49pm

My matrix number is much simpler -- 90573 which is also the catalog number. I see from my notes that this cd was issued with two different catalog numbers and it appears both of these were mastered differently.

The point I am trying to bring up is since the year was 1987, there were both cd's and vinyl LP's being sold for this title so which should be considered the "LP version" the vinyl LP or the cd?]]> Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:49:25 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=176&PID=20576&title=one-for-the-mockingbird-cutting-crew#20576 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=176&PID=20569&title=one-for-the-mockingbird-cutting-crew#20569 Author: aaronk
Subject: 176
Posted: 15 January 2009 at 12:33pm

Pat Downey wrote: This is confusing because I believe the US vinyl LP had 1 "oh" at :06 but CFTP is saying he has a cd (not vinyl) copy of "Broadcast" with 4 "oh's" at :06. On my "Broadcast" cd there is 1 "oh" at :06 so it is the cd only that appears to have two different mixes. Anyone have a vinyl LP with 4 "oh's" at :06?

"Oh" I see. (Sorry for the pun.) Well, if that's the case, then wouldn't a more appropriate designation be "LP length," as long as no vinyl LP exists with the 4 "oh's"? (Since this version is a "remix" though, I still wonder if US vinyl LPs exist with the non-remixed 4-oh's version.)]]> Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:33:00 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=176&PID=20569&title=one-for-the-mockingbird-cutting-crew#20569 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=176&PID=20564&title=one-for-the-mockingbird-cutting-crew#20564 Author: crapfromthepast
Subject: 176
Posted: 15 January 2009 at 11:31am

Pat - Can you post the matrix number of your 1-"oh" CD? My 4-"oh" CD is 86002 01# 03-14-94.]]> Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:31:23 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=176&PID=20564&title=one-for-the-mockingbird-cutting-crew#20564 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=176&PID=20562&title=one-for-the-mockingbird-cutting-crew#20562 Author: Pat Downey
Subject: 176
Posted: 14 January 2009 at 9:26pm

This is confusing because I believe the US vinyl LP had 1 "oh" at :06 but CFTP is saying he has a cd (not vinyl) copy of "Broadcast" with 4 "oh's" at :06. On my "Broadcast" cd there is 1 "oh" at :06 so it is the cd only that appears to have two different mixes. Anyone have a vinyl LP with 4 "oh's" at :06?]]> Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:26:36 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=176&PID=20562&title=one-for-the-mockingbird-cutting-crew#20562 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=176&PID=20491&title=one-for-the-mockingbird-cutting-crew#20491 Author: aaronk
Subject: 176
Posted: 11 January 2009 at 10:18pm

Pat, the database is kind of confusing on this entry. It currently says "U.S. LP mix." This is not entirely true, since some copies of the LP have the non-remixed version. It's also misleading, because the 45 and some copies of Broadcast contain the same mix, just differing in length. I'm not sure the best approach for labeling these. Any suggestions?]]> Sun, 11 Jan 2009 22:18:24 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=176&PID=20491&title=one-for-the-mockingbird-cutting-crew#20491