https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/ Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Fri, 08 May 2026 20:33:58 +0000 Tue, 04 Nov 2014 15:29:53 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 12.07 360 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=2004 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum//images/Top-40-Music-on-CD-Forum-Logo.png https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/ https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2004&PID=42540&title=little-sistersomebodys-youre-the-one#42540 Author: edtop40
Subject: 2004
Posted: 04 November 2014 at 3:29pm

my commercial 45 for the little sister song 'somebody's
watching you' issued as stone flower 9001 lists the run
time on the label as 2:46 but actually runs 2:54...]]> Tue, 04 Nov 2014 15:29:53 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2004&PID=42540&title=little-sistersomebodys-youre-the-one#42540 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2004&PID=36822&title=little-sistersomebodys-youre-the-one#36822 Author: MMathews
Subject: 2004
Posted: 19 February 2013 at 10:24pm

David,
i can jump in here also, as Ed just sent me the dubs of
both part 1 and 2.
The fade on part 1 starts around 3:05, is long and slow,
with final audio disappearing at 3:30.   

Now, you may notice that doing that from the Eric cd,
that makes the beginning of Part 2 audible at the tail
end. Yet, on the 45, those last 2 seconds are different,
they sound like the same groove as just before there but
continuing on. (if you understand that...)
I'm not sure why, other than for the mono mix, they
edited that final portion differently.

For Paul C: i agree that i think they used segments of
this song more than once. The long version to me always
sounded like an extended version of a shorter take.

Also - Ed's copy for Part 1 agrees with yours; (3:30).

But for Part 2 - can you double check your timing of
(3:13)? ... i checked again and my copy (Ed's copy) for
Part 2 is completely finished at (3:11).

For David: when creating Part 2 from the CD, the CD
version finishes 2 secs sooner at the fade.
It's possible that audio was on the tape but that it was
so low at that point we faded it out. I'm not sure.

MM]]> Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:24:05 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2004&PID=36822&title=little-sistersomebodys-youre-the-one#36822 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2004&PID=36786&title=little-sistersomebodys-youre-the-one#36786 Author: davidclark
Subject: 2004
Posted: 18 February 2013 at 11:39pm

Paul, can you describe the Part 1 fade?]]> Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:39:55 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2004&PID=36786&title=little-sistersomebodys-youre-the-one#36786 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2004&PID=36785&title=little-sistersomebodys-youre-the-one#36785 Author: aaronk
Subject: 2004
Posted: 18 February 2013 at 8:32pm

If there is any way you could send the file for me to hear, that would be
excellent :)]]> Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:32:41 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2004&PID=36785&title=little-sistersomebodys-youre-the-one#36785 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2004&PID=36784&title=little-sistersomebodys-youre-the-one#36784 Author: Paul C
Subject: 2004
Posted: 18 February 2013 at 5:43pm

They definitely don't sound like vinyl dubs to me, Aaron.

I've tried to conduct a more accurate comparison of the version of "You're The One" on the Ace CD and the 45, and it now appears to me that the Ace version switches from Part 1 to Part 2 at (2:09) and then continues with all of Part 2. (So I now believe that my statement above that the first part of Part 2 is missing is incorrect.) It is a bit difficult to tell for sure, however, since the segment of Part 1 that starts at (2:09) is so similar to the first segment of Part 2 that it's hard to tell which segment is on the Ace CD. (The two segments sound so similar to me that it wouldn't surprise me if it's actually the same piece of tape.) The very last segment of Part 1 is definitely not on the Ace CD.]]> Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:43:08 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2004&PID=36784&title=little-sistersomebodys-youre-the-one#36784 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2004&PID=36778&title=little-sistersomebodys-youre-the-one#36778 Author: aaronk
Subject: 2004
Posted: 18 February 2013 at 3:41pm

Great info, Paul! Do they sound like vinyl dubs, or were they taken from master tapes? Also, how much of "You're The One" is missing?]]> Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:41:56 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2004&PID=36778&title=little-sistersomebodys-youre-the-one#36778 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2004&PID=36777&title=little-sistersomebodys-youre-the-one#36777 Author: Paul C
Subject: 2004
Posted: 18 February 2013 at 3:10pm

I timed Part 1 of "You're The One" at (3:30) and Part 2 at (3:13). There is a mono version of the song on the Ace UK CD, Listen To The Voices - Sly Stone In The Studio - 1965-70, that runs (5:21). It is missing the last part of Part 1 and the first part of Part 2. The Ace CD also has "Somebody's Watching You" in mono.]]> Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:10:44 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2004&PID=36777&title=little-sistersomebodys-youre-the-one#36777 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2004&PID=36674&title=little-sistersomebodys-youre-the-one#36674 Author: MMathews
Subject: 2004
Posted: 11 February 2013 at 11:53pm

My timings are from faded memory .. hopefully someone has
the actual run times.

David, yes, this release was first time stereo and first
time released as one long take.
As far as i recall, the raw stereo tape was found by Bill
Inglot when he was in a vault looking for something else.
I'm just glad it came up for use someplace.

So yes, there might be a few seconds of audio just after
part one would have faded that we don't hear on the 45,
but there's nothing much unique there to hear.
I just remember we timed it out, because some folks were
sure they heard one or the other parts in their area, we
made sure both parts were present.





]]> Mon, 11 Feb 2013 23:53:34 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2004&PID=36674&title=little-sistersomebodys-youre-the-one#36674 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2004&PID=36673&title=little-sistersomebodys-youre-the-one#36673 Author: davidclark
Subject: 2004
Posted: 11 February 2013 at 9:56pm

thanks Markie.

There doesn't seem to be an LP for this band. Is the Eric CD the first time
stereo? Also, is it first time the parts are presented together? Also, the
complete version contains several seconds not present on either side of the
45, according to Markie's timings. Note the a-side of the 45 states a run
time of 3:30.

Edited by davidclark]]> Mon, 11 Feb 2013 21:56:41 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2004&PID=36673&title=little-sistersomebodys-youre-the-one#36673 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2004&PID=36668&title=little-sistersomebodys-youre-the-one#36668 Author: MMathews
Subject: 2004
Posted: 11 February 2013 at 3:16pm

OK
It's been a few years but here's what i know:

The change-over in the long version is at exactly 3:28.

I don't have the exact 45 anymore, but from memory part 1
runs 3:15, and from the long version simply fade from
around 3 minutes until 3:15.
for part 2, there is no fade in, it picks up right at the
3:28 mark in the long one.   It cuts in abruptly when
they yell at the "Aahhhhh" part.   So you would use from
there to the end for part 2.
Addl. details about the 45 fades and run-time are
welcome...
MM]]> Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:16:12 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2004&PID=36668&title=little-sistersomebodys-youre-the-one#36668