<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>Top 40 Music on CD Forum : Sim&#111;n &amp; Garfunkel 45 vs. LP mixes</title>
  <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; Top 40 Music on CD Forum : Chat Board  : Sim&#111;n &amp; Garfunkel 45 vs. LP mixes]]></description>
  <copyright>Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
  <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 16:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:09:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.07</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=2053</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Sim&#111;n &amp; Garfunkel 45 vs. LP mixes : What strikes me about the 45 mix...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2053&amp;PID=19450&amp;title=simon-garfunkel-45-vs-lp-mixes#19450</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=212">Yah Shure</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2053<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 24&nbsp;October&nbsp;2008 at 2:09pm<br /><br />What strikes me about the 45 mix of "A Hazy Shade Of Winter" is how far more prominent the vocals are.  You can actually understand what Paul and Artie are singing!  The split-channel vocals on the stereo mix tend to be overpowered by the backing track.  When the stereo mix is played on AM radio (or on a mono FM receiver) the vocals get buried under a foot of snow; "A Hazier Shade Of Winter," as it were.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2053&amp;PID=19450&amp;title=simon-garfunkel-45-vs-lp-mixes#19450</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Sim&#111;n &amp; Garfunkel 45 vs. LP mixes : I&amp;#039;m actually glad that Hykker...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2053&amp;PID=19416&amp;title=simon-garfunkel-45-vs-lp-mixes#19416</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=156">eriejwg</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2053<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 23&nbsp;October&nbsp;2008 at 10:25am<br /><br />I'm actually glad that Hykker brought this thread back. Reminded me that I needed to purchase 45 copies of "At The Zoo" and "A Hazy Shade of Winter", which I did today.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2053&amp;PID=19416&amp;title=simon-garfunkel-45-vs-lp-mixes#19416</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Sim&#111;n &amp; Garfunkel 45 vs. LP mixes : I think we can be certain that...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2053&amp;PID=19415&amp;title=simon-garfunkel-45-vs-lp-mixes#19415</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=231">Indy500</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2053<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 23&nbsp;October&nbsp;2008 at 8:53am<br /><br />I think we can be certain that Columbia mono mixes are not fold-downs even if they are undistinguishable from the stereo mix.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2053&amp;PID=19415&amp;title=simon-garfunkel-45-vs-lp-mixes#19415</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Sim&#111;n &amp; Garfunkel 45 vs. LP mixes :   Todd Ireland wrote:Ok, I&amp;#039;ve...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2053&amp;PID=19410&amp;title=simon-garfunkel-45-vs-lp-mixes#19410</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=193">Hykker</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2053<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 22&nbsp;October&nbsp;2008 at 7:10pm<br /><br /> <table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><img src="forum_images/quote_box.png" title="Originally posted by Todd Ireland" alt="Originally posted by Todd Ireland" style="vertical-align: text-bottom;" /> <strong>Todd Ireland wrote:</strong><br /><br />Ok, I've done an A-B comparison between Jim's commercial 45 of "Cecilia", which is mono, and the stereo mix on Simon & Garfunkel's <em>Best of</em> CD. The 45 does run slightly faster than the LP and the acoustic guitar is more pronounced throughout the 45, while barely audible at all during most of the stereo mix.  Meanwhile, the stereo mix contains someone whistling at 1:07, which is not present on the 45.  Pat has updated the database to reflect that the 45 and LP are different, but I thought I'd elaborate on the specific differences alleged for this song earlier in this thread.</td></tr></table> <br /><br />Bringing this thread back from the past.<br />Another difference that stands out to me is the xylophone (?) at the beginning of the instrumental bridge seems to be mixed higher on the 45 than the album.<br /><br />Does anyone have the stereo promo copy of this single?  I could have sworn I played it back in '70 (and indeed most Columbia promo 45s of that era were mono/stereo), but my promo is just a white-label version of the commercial single.<br /><br />]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2053&amp;PID=19410&amp;title=simon-garfunkel-45-vs-lp-mixes#19410</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Sim&#111;n &amp; Garfunkel 45 vs. LP mixes : Just got done comparing Jim&amp;#039;s...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2053&amp;PID=10032&amp;title=simon-garfunkel-45-vs-lp-mixes#10032</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=17">Todd Ireland</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2053<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 28&nbsp;May&nbsp;2007 at 10:37pm<br /><br />Just got done comparing Jim's commercial 45 of "Bridge over Troubled Water", which is mono, to the stereo mix on Simon & Garfunkel's <em>Best of</em> CD.  I honestly didn't notice any significant differences between the two that would warrant a 45/LP version or 45/LP mix notation in the database.  There really isn't any speed difference between the two either.  Therefore, I disagree with the differences that were previously reported for the 45 and LP of "Bridge over Troubled Water" and am of the opinion that no additional database comments are needed here.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 22:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2053&amp;PID=10032&amp;title=simon-garfunkel-45-vs-lp-mixes#10032</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Sim&#111;n &amp; Garfunkel 45 vs. LP mixes : Ok, I&amp;#039;ve done an A-B comparison...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2053&amp;PID=10031&amp;title=simon-garfunkel-45-vs-lp-mixes#10031</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=17">Todd Ireland</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2053<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 28&nbsp;May&nbsp;2007 at 10:07pm<br /><br />Ok, I've done an A-B comparison between Jim's commercial 45 of "Cecilia", which is mono, and the stereo mix on Simon & Garfunkel's <em>Best of</em> CD. The 45 does run slightly faster than the LP and the acoustic guitar is more pronounced throughout the 45, while barely audible at all during most of the stereo mix.  Meanwhile, the stereo mix contains someone whistling at 1:07, which is not present on the 45.  Pat has updated the database to reflect that the 45 and LP are different, but I thought I'd elaborate on the specific differences alleged for this song earlier in this thread.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 22:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2053&amp;PID=10031&amp;title=simon-garfunkel-45-vs-lp-mixes#10031</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Sim&#111;n &amp; Garfunkel 45 vs. LP mixes : Having now had a chance to compare...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2053&amp;PID=9972&amp;title=simon-garfunkel-45-vs-lp-mixes#9972</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=17">Todd Ireland</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2053<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 23&nbsp;May&nbsp;2007 at 10:40pm<br /><br />Having now had a chance to compare Jim's "Homeward Bound" mono commercial 45 to the stereo mix on Simon & Garfunkel's <em>Best of</em> CD, I agree that the LP version contains some slight reverb not heard on the 45.  That's pretty much the only difference I hear between the two mixes though.  So does anyone think the light reverb is significant enough to warrant some sort of general mention in the database?  Perhaps something like: (<em>The stereo LP contains slight reverb not heard on the mono 45</em>)?<span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by Todd Ireland</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 22:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2053&amp;PID=9972&amp;title=simon-garfunkel-45-vs-lp-mixes#9972</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Sim&#111;n &amp; Garfunkel 45 vs. LP mixes : I have an update on Simon and...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2053&amp;PID=9971&amp;title=simon-garfunkel-45-vs-lp-mixes#9971</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=17">Todd Ireland</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2053<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 23&nbsp;May&nbsp;2007 at 10:19pm<br /><br />I have an update on Simon and Garfunkel's "Hazy Shade of Winter".  Thanks to some always appreciated help from Jim, I compared an mp3 of his commercial 45 to the stereo version on Simon and Garfunkel's <em>Best of</em> CD (Columbia/Legacy 66022).  I've confirmed there are indeed very short horn passages at the :55, :59, 1:02, and 1:36 points on the 45 that are not on what appears to be the LP version on <em>Best of</em>.  Pat must have recently noticed this too as there are now comments in the database reflecting that the 45 and LP are different.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 22:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2053&amp;PID=9971&amp;title=simon-garfunkel-45-vs-lp-mixes#9971</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Sim&#111;n &amp; Garfunkel 45 vs. LP mixes : The 45 version of &amp;#034;At The...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2053&amp;PID=9837&amp;title=simon-garfunkel-45-vs-lp-mixes#9837</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=119">PaulEschen</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2053<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 13&nbsp;May&nbsp;2007 at 7:16am<br /><br />The 45 version of "At The Zoo" does not have the phasing effect on the <br />percussion after the opening lines, and again, when the phrase is <br />repeated.  The 45 version of "Homeward Bound" does sound as though <br />there is no reverb, and also, the drums sound as though they have more <br />low-end, or bass sound to them, and it seems that one can hear the <br />organ in the chorus a little louder as well.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 07:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2053&amp;PID=9837&amp;title=simon-garfunkel-45-vs-lp-mixes#9837</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Sim&#111;n &amp; Garfunkel 45 vs. LP mixes : The heavy reverb might not have...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2053&amp;PID=9827&amp;title=simon-garfunkel-45-vs-lp-mixes#9827</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=13">BillCahill</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2053<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 12&nbsp;May&nbsp;2007 at 4:12pm<br /><br />The heavy reverb might not have been on the original stereo lp of Homeward Bound. It's been docummented that reverb was added to the masters over the years. This is because Columbia had an insane process of making a dub ONCE from the original mix downs master. When that dub started to wear out they'd make a dub from THAT worn out dub until that wore out. Then another. Over time they covered up the tape drop outs with reverb. Simon and Garfunkel's Collected Works CD set contains the reverbed tapes. I believe later vinyl does too. Bob Irwin's digital multi track remixes do not. I think you'd need to find an original pressing to determine if that reverb was present on the stereo LP. Maybe somebody else knows more, correct me if I'm wrong. As far as the other mixes, stereo vs. mono, there are probably some slight differences. ]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 16:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2053&amp;PID=9827&amp;title=simon-garfunkel-45-vs-lp-mixes#9827</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>