https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/ Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Fri, 08 May 2026 10:56:15 +0000 Mon, 17 Aug 2015 16:49:17 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 12.07 360 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=234 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum//images/Top-40-Music-on-CD-Forum-Logo.png https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/ https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=234&PID=44158&title=single-edits-vs-single-mixes#44158 Author: Michaeldila
Subject: 234
Posted: 17 August 2015 at 4:49pm

i am also wondering about debbie gibson's "we could be together"...there are
a few promo cd's with several different edits and lengths: "lp edit", "radio
mix", "7" version" and "7" extended version". i am 99% sure the "radio mix" is
a shortened version of the "house" remix, and i know what the "lp edit" is,
but does anyone know what the "7" versions" are? is this the version played
on radio stations in the US?]]> Mon, 17 Aug 2015 16:49:17 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=234&PID=44158&title=single-edits-vs-single-mixes#44158 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=234&PID=12931&title=single-edits-vs-single-mixes#12931 Author: eriejwg
Subject: 234
Posted: 24 November 2007 at 2:01pm

Just edited this one from my AM Gold 1979 collection. Many thanks to Paul, Doug and Aaron for the edit points!]]> Sat, 24 Nov 2007 14:01:58 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=234&PID=12931&title=single-edits-vs-single-mixes#12931 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=234&PID=2150&title=single-edits-vs-single-mixes#2150 Author: wayne
Subject: 234
Posted: 07 October 2005 at 3:36pm

Todd, If you would like I could arrange a copy of the Australian single for comparison]]> Fri, 07 Oct 2005 15:36:32 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=234&PID=2150&title=single-edits-vs-single-mixes#2150 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=234&PID=2103&title=single-edits-vs-single-mixes#2103 Author: Todd Ireland
Subject: 234
Posted: 29 September 2005 at 8:19pm

I'm planning to edit the LP/CD version of "Lonesome Loser" to match the 45 version sometime in the next couple of months. When I get a copy of the vinyl 45, I'll let everyone know if the edits on it are smooth or not.

Edited by Todd Ireland]]> Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:19:56 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=234&PID=2103&title=single-edits-vs-single-mixes#2103 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=234&PID=2091&title=single-edits-vs-single-mixes#2091 Author: sriv94
Subject: 234
Posted: 27 September 2005 at 7:48pm

aaronk wrote: Doug, no need to forward the "Lonesome Loser" edit. I re-edited the song myself, and my edits are much smoother than the ones on the TM Century disc. They probably just did a sloppy job.

Point taken, but I still don't know if I got it right. :)

Doug

Edited by sriv94]]> Tue, 27 Sep 2005 19:48:57 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=234&PID=2091&title=single-edits-vs-single-mixes#2091 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=234&PID=2089&title=single-edits-vs-single-mixes#2089 Author: aaronk
Subject: 234
Posted: 27 September 2005 at 9:13am

Doug, no need to forward the "Lonesome Loser" edit. I re-edited the song myself, and my edits are much smoother than the ones on the TM Century disc. They probably just did a sloppy job.]]> Tue, 27 Sep 2005 09:13:57 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=234&PID=2089&title=single-edits-vs-single-mixes#2089 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=234&PID=2088&title=single-edits-vs-single-mixes#2088 Author: sriv94
Subject: 234
Posted: 26 September 2005 at 8:36pm

aaronk wrote: Again, I don't have the actual 45 to check, but I'm pretty sure this one is correct on my TM disc.

Mega mega thanks. I think I got it.

Doug]]> Mon, 26 Sep 2005 20:36:56 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=234&PID=2088&title=single-edits-vs-single-mixes#2088 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=234&PID=2087&title=single-edits-vs-single-mixes#2087 Author: sriv94
Subject: 234
Posted: 26 September 2005 at 8:20pm

aaronk wrote: Doug, in response to your post about the "Lonesome Loser" edit... I pulled out my TM Century disc for this one, too. I'm not sure if TM just did a sloppy job, or if the actual 45 version has bad edits. On theirs, they made the first edit on the high hat hit right before the vocal, rather than right on the "ooooh." But the worst one is the second one. After the first "have you heard..." they made the edit on the snare hit, which then cuts to the second guitar break. You can hear the tail end of the reverb from the second "have you heard..." where the edit is, but it sounds choppy on my disc, like they made the edit a split second too soon instead of right on the snare hit. Does your copy sound like that also?

To be honest I'm not sure (again, I'm working with a radio station aircheck version). The edit I wound up making sounds pretty smooth (may not be an exact match, but it's pretty darn close to what I heard on the aircheck). Again, I can't A/B it with anything because I'm not working with vinyl. If it'll help, I'll be happy to forward you a copy for comparison purposes (don't know if that's against board policy, but I might as well ask).

As to "The Night Owls," I'll give it a shot. Thanks for the tip, AaronK. :)

Doug]]> Mon, 26 Sep 2005 20:20:13 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=234&PID=2087&title=single-edits-vs-single-mixes#2087 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=234&PID=2086&title=single-edits-vs-single-mixes#2086 Author: aaronk
Subject: 234
Posted: 26 September 2005 at 8:00pm

Doug, in response to your post about the "Lonesome Loser" edit... I pulled out my TM Century disc for this one, too. I'm not sure if TM just did a sloppy job, or if the actual 45 version has bad edits. On theirs, they made the first edit on the high hat hit right before the vocal, rather than right on the "ooooh."

But the worst one is the second one. After the first "have you heard..." they made the edit on the snare hit, which then cuts to the second guitar break. You can hear the tail end of the reverb from the second "have you heard..." where the edit is, but it sounds choppy on my disc, like they made the edit a split second too soon instead of right on the snare hit. Does your copy sound like that also?

Edited by aaronk]]> Mon, 26 Sep 2005 20:00:42 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=234&PID=2086&title=single-edits-vs-single-mixes#2086 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=234&PID=2085&title=single-edits-vs-single-mixes#2085 Author: aaronk
Subject: 234
Posted: 26 September 2005 at 7:48pm

Yes, I can help out with that. Per my TM Century disc, here are the edits:

1) The intro is cut in half with the edit points right before the drum/cymbol hit at 6 1/2 seconds, and that same "hit" right before the first vocals.
2) If you're listening to the LP version (no edits), the next edit would splice out 2:26 to 2:42 on the first count of that measure. If you've already made the first edit, then the next edit would be at 2:19.
3) After making the first two edits, remove all audio past 3:51. Make your bell-curve fade out from 3:33 to 3:51.

Again, I don't have the actual 45 to check, but I'm pretty sure this one is correct on my TM disc.]]> Mon, 26 Sep 2005 19:48:37 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=234&PID=2085&title=single-edits-vs-single-mixes#2085