<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>Top 40 Music on CD Forum : &quot;Breaking Us in Two&quot; - Joe Jacks&#111;n</title>
  <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; Top 40 Music on CD Forum : Chat Board  : &quot;Breaking Us in Two&quot; - Joe Jacks&#111;n]]></description>
  <copyright>Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
  <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 20:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2017 22:49:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.07</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=250</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[&quot;Breaking Us in Two&quot; - Joe Jacks&#111;n : I discovered that the UK single...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=250&amp;PID=48019&amp;title=breaking-us-in-two-joe-jackson#48019</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=44">eric_a</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 250<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 03&nbsp;September&nbsp;2017 at 10:49pm<br /><br />I discovered that the UK single has a different edit from <br />the US single or radio edit. From what I can tell, it's <br />just an early fade to 4:32, and pitched up slightly (less <br />than +1%).  ]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2017 22:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=250&amp;PID=48019&amp;title=breaking-us-in-two-joe-jackson#48019</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[&quot;Breaking Us in Two&quot; - Joe Jacks&#111;n : Yes, it was pitched up. There...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=250&amp;PID=30474&amp;title=breaking-us-in-two-joe-jackson#30474</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=156">eriejwg</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 250<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08&nbsp;June&nbsp;2011 at 7:19pm<br /><br />Yes, it was pitched up. There was a thread a few years ago describing how to recreate the 45 version. Will try and locate it.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 19:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=250&amp;PID=30474&amp;title=breaking-us-in-two-joe-jackson#30474</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[&quot;Breaking Us in Two&quot; - Joe Jacks&#111;n : Was the short side of the promo...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=250&amp;PID=30473&amp;title=breaking-us-in-two-joe-jackson#30473</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=52">sriv94</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 250<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08&nbsp;June&nbsp;2011 at 10:20am<br /><br />Was the short side of the promo also slightly sped?]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 10:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=250&amp;PID=30473&amp;title=breaking-us-in-two-joe-jackson#30473</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[&quot;Breaking Us in Two&quot; - Joe Jacks&#111;n : The actual LP running time is...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=250&amp;PID=30472&amp;title=breaking-us-in-two-joe-jackson#30472</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=248">abagon</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 250<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08&nbsp;June&nbsp;2011 at 10:05am<br /><br />The actual LP running time is (4:55), the listed time is "4:57" on the LP record label (A&M SP-4906)<br />My commercial 45 ran (4:46). The 45 is slight shorter, and faster than the vinyl LP. I think CD entries need "45 speed" or "LP speed" comment. Because it has speed difference of 4 seconds. <br />The last word "two" in the lyric "breaking us in two" on the last verse is at (4:14) on the vinyl LP, the same point on the 45 is at (4:10).<br />Nice finding, ed!<br /><br />--abagon]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 10:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=250&amp;PID=30472&amp;title=breaking-us-in-two-joe-jackson#30472</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[&quot;Breaking Us in Two&quot; - Joe Jacks&#111;n : my commercial 45 issued as a&amp;m...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=250&amp;PID=15402&amp;title=breaking-us-in-two-joe-jackson#15402</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=24">edtop40</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 250<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 13&nbsp;April&nbsp;2008 at 9:27am<br /><br />my commercial 45 issued as a&m 2510 states a run time on the label of 4:57 but actually runs 4:46....it is also slightly sped up as well...(anyone else notice this).....if you fade out from 4:40-4:46 you'll be able to re-create the proper 45 version.....]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 09:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=250&amp;PID=15402&amp;title=breaking-us-in-two-joe-jackson#15402</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[&quot;Breaking Us in Two&quot; - Joe Jacks&#111;n :   jimct wrote:Pat: When my long...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=250&amp;PID=4665&amp;title=breaking-us-in-two-joe-jackson#4665</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=17">Todd Ireland</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 250<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 02&nbsp;May&nbsp;2006 at 1:32pm<br /><br /> <table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><img src="forum_images/quote_box.png" title="Originally posted by jimct" alt="Originally posted by jimct" style="vertical-align: text-bottom;" /> <strong>jimct wrote:</strong><br /><br />Pat: When my long DJ timing of "Breaking Us In Two" came in at (4:44), I was surprised that those last 3 seconds weren't there. To be sure, I stop-watched it a second time, making sure I got EVERY milli-second of fade (which I always try to do anyway.) Nope, it's definitely (4:44). Just reporting the facts... (PS - deadwax says "A&M-AM-02510A-Long - P1")</td></tr></table><br /><br />I've seen a number of cases in the database where the DJ copies of a song may differ from its commercial 45 release by several seconds.  Sounds like this may be such a case with "Breaking Us in Two".<br /><br />Thanks for helping solve another mystery, guys!]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 13:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=250&amp;PID=4665&amp;title=breaking-us-in-two-joe-jackson#4665</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[&quot;Breaking Us in Two&quot; - Joe Jacks&#111;n :   Grant wrote:That edit should...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=250&amp;PID=4663&amp;title=breaking-us-in-two-joe-jackson#4663</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=52">sriv94</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 250<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 02&nbsp;May&nbsp;2006 at 11:35am<br /><br /> <table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><img src="forum_images/quote_box.png" title="Originally posted by Grant" alt="Originally posted by Grant" style="vertical-align: text-bottom;" /> <strong>Grant wrote:</strong><br /><br />That edit should be a snap to recreate from the LP version.  It cuts out most of the instrumental break in the middle.</td></tr></table><br /><br />I agree, but I always thought the edit sounded awkward.  You could've made a better edit by just excising the instrumental break and bridge and verse leading up to it.<br /><br />I may try that--one of these days (of course, I'd also have to try to create the edit as it actually was as well).  :)]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 11:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=250&amp;PID=4663&amp;title=breaking-us-in-two-joe-jackson#4663</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[&quot;Breaking Us in Two&quot; - Joe Jacks&#111;n : Pat: When my long DJ timing of...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=250&amp;PID=4662&amp;title=breaking-us-in-two-joe-jackson#4662</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=77">jimct</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 250<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 02&nbsp;May&nbsp;2006 at 9:25am<br /><br />Pat: When my long DJ timing of "Breaking Us In Two" came in at (4:44), I was surprised that those last 3 seconds weren't there. To be sure, I stop-watched it a second time, making sure I got EVERY milli-second of fade (which I always try to do anyway.) Nope, it's definitely (4:44). Just reporting the facts... (PS - deadwax says "A&M-AM-02510A-Long - P1")<span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by jimct</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 09:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=250&amp;PID=4662&amp;title=breaking-us-in-two-joe-jackson#4662</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[&quot;Breaking Us in Two&quot; - Joe Jacks&#111;n : Jim, could you time the long version...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=250&amp;PID=4659&amp;title=breaking-us-in-two-joe-jackson#4659</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=1">Pat Downey</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 250<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 02&nbsp;May&nbsp;2006 at 5:54am<br /><br />Jim, could you time the long version of this song on your dj copy as my commercial copy runs (4:46) not (4:57) as stated on the record label.<span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by Pat Downey</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 05:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=250&amp;PID=4659&amp;title=breaking-us-in-two-joe-jackson#4659</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[&quot;Breaking Us in Two&quot; - Joe Jacks&#111;n : That edit should be a snap to...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=250&amp;PID=4658&amp;title=breaking-us-in-two-joe-jackson#4658</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=9">Grant</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 250<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 02&nbsp;May&nbsp;2006 at 2:02am<br /><br />That edit should be a snap to recreate from the LP version.  It cuts out most of the instrumental break in the middle.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 02:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=250&amp;PID=4658&amp;title=breaking-us-in-two-joe-jackson#4658</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>