https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/ Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Mon, 27 Apr 2026 20:48:21 +0000 Fri, 04 Feb 2011 13:55:03 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 12.07 360 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=2619 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum//images/Top-40-Music-on-CD-Forum-Logo.png https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/ https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2619&PID=29100&title=rolling-stones-beast-of-burden#29100 Author: eriejwg
Subject: 2619
Posted: 04 February 2011 at 1:55pm

Just got in the promo I ordered. The 'short version' has a listed time of 3:20, actual time of 3:22. The promo 45 runs about .8% slower than the digital copy I have from Sucking In The Seventies. The fade on the promo starts at 3:06 and ends completely on "are hurtin'.]]> Fri, 04 Feb 2011 13:55:03 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2619&PID=29100&title=rolling-stones-beast-of-burden#29100 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2619&PID=29068&title=rolling-stones-beast-of-burden#29068 Author: eriejwg
Subject: 2619
Posted: 01 February 2011 at 10:25am

I've got a promo 45 on order, so hopefully I can report back on the fade of the short version.]]> Tue, 01 Feb 2011 10:25:52 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2619&PID=29068&title=rolling-stones-beast-of-burden#29068 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2619&PID=29041&title=rolling-stones-beast-of-burden#29041 Author: eriejwg
Subject: 2619
Posted: 27 January 2011 at 5:25pm

Bringing this one back, since it was never determined what the :05 difference was.]]> Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:25:06 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2619&PID=29041&title=rolling-stones-beast-of-burden#29041 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2619&PID=19522&title=rolling-stones-beast-of-burden#19522 Author: aaronk
Subject: 2619
Posted: 29 October 2008 at 12:54am

Honestly, I don't think we ever went any further than just talking about it on this thread! I'll catch up with Jim in the near future, unless someone else comes to the rescue.]]> Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:54:07 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2619&PID=19522&title=rolling-stones-beast-of-burden#19522 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2619&PID=19515&title=rolling-stones-beast-of-burden#19515 Author: eriejwg
Subject: 2619
Posted: 28 October 2008 at 6:54pm

Aaron, were you able to determine what the :05 difference was? Speed, length or edit?]]> Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:54:42 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2619&PID=19515&title=rolling-stones-beast-of-burden#19515 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2619&PID=12239&title=rolling-stones-beast-of-burden#12239 Author: aaronk
Subject: 2619
Posted: 27 October 2007 at 9:28pm

Thanks, Jim. It looks like we'll have to get to the bottom of the :05 difference between your vinyl promo and the CD versions.]]> Sat, 27 Oct 2007 21:28:06 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2619&PID=12239&title=rolling-stones-beast-of-burden#12239 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2619&PID=12233&title=rolling-stones-beast-of-burden#12233 Author: jimct
Subject: 2619
Posted: 27 October 2007 at 8:36am

Aaron, my promo 45 has a listed time of (3:20) and an actual time of (3:21).]]> Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:36:16 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2619&PID=12233&title=rolling-stones-beast-of-burden#12233 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2619&PID=12225&title=rolling-stones-beast-of-burden#12225 Author: aaronk
Subject: 2619
Posted: 27 October 2007 at 1:25am

The comment for Rolling Stones' "Beast Of Burden" says that DJ copies run (3:20). While there are no notations next to the CDs, several discs run (3:26) or (3:27). Is this the DJ edit but longer, or is the printed time on the DJ 45 wrong?]]> Sat, 27 Oct 2007 01:25:10 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2619&PID=12225&title=rolling-stones-beast-of-burden#12225