<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>Top 40 Music on CD Forum : Osm&#111;nds 45s</title>
  <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; Top 40 Music on CD Forum : Chat Board  : Osm&#111;nds 45s]]></description>
  <copyright>Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
  <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 01:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:14:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.07</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=3269</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Osm&#111;nds 45s : The Donny Osmond/Sweet &amp; Innocent...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3269&amp;PID=35052&amp;title=osmonds-45s#35052</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=323">KentT</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3269<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 22&nbsp;August&nbsp;2012 at 4:14pm<br /><br />The Donny Osmond/Sweet & Innocent 45 is mono only and a different performance than the Osmonds LP version is. Recorded by Rick Hall at Fame Studios in Muscle Shoals, Alabama. My MGM Osmonds 45 singles are in nice condition and sound excellent. I own the UK MGM 45 of "Morning Side Of The Mountain". A tip, these singles are best played back on broadcast cartridges with conical styli, the Stanton 681a or Pickering XV 15 DJ are my favorites and the Shure M 44-7 or M 44-G are nice choices too. <span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by KentT</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3269&amp;PID=35052&amp;title=osmonds-45s#35052</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Osm&#111;nds 45s : See Yo-Yo thread ]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3269&amp;PID=35040&amp;title=osmonds-45s#35040</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=231">Indy500</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3269<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 21&nbsp;August&nbsp;2012 at 7:43pm<br /><br />See Yo-Yo thread]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 19:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3269&amp;PID=35040&amp;title=osmonds-45s#35040</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Osm&#111;nds 45s : Bumping for Ed. ]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3269&amp;PID=35038&amp;title=osmonds-45s#35038</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=156">eriejwg</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3269<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 21&nbsp;August&nbsp;2012 at 7:41pm<br /><br />Bumping for Ed.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 19:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3269&amp;PID=35038&amp;title=osmonds-45s#35038</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Osm&#111;nds 45s : I&amp;#039;m 99% sure there is an...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3269&amp;PID=15545&amp;title=osmonds-45s#15545</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=32">aaronk</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3269<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 21&nbsp;April&nbsp;2008 at 10:53pm<br /><br />I'm 99% sure there is an edit in "Yo-Yo," and Pat's notes are probably correct that it's around 2:00.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3269&amp;PID=15545&amp;title=osmonds-45s#15545</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Osm&#111;nds 45s : Thanks, Pat! ]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3269&amp;PID=15542&amp;title=osmonds-45s#15542</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=156">eriejwg</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3269<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 21&nbsp;April&nbsp;2008 at 7:05pm<br /><br />Thanks, Pat!]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3269&amp;PID=15542&amp;title=osmonds-45s#15542</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Osm&#111;nds 45s : Regarding &amp;#034;Love Me For A...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3269&amp;PID=15541&amp;title=osmonds-45s#15541</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=1">Pat Downey</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3269<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 21&nbsp;April&nbsp;2008 at 6:26pm<br /><br />Regarding "Love Me For A Reason" I hear horn overdubs on the 45 version that I do not hear on the LP version.  Listen starting at 1:25.  My notes on Yo Yo indicate that the 45 and LP start diverging at the 2:00 mark.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3269&amp;PID=15541&amp;title=osmonds-45s#15541</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Osm&#111;nds 45s : Just got in a commercial 45 for...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3269&amp;PID=15539&amp;title=osmonds-45s#15539</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=156">eriejwg</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3269<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 21&nbsp;April&nbsp;2008 at 10:13am<br /><br />Just got in a commercial 45 for "Love Me For A Reason." Listed is 3:45, actual is 3:47.<br /><br />Besides being an early fade of the LP, the background vocals aren't nearly as buried on the 45 as on the LP version.<br /><br />Unfortunately, the audio quality of any MGM's I've encountered with the Osmonds 45's I have bought has been poor. Love Me For A Reason, Yo-Yo and Double Lovin'.<br />]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 10:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3269&amp;PID=15539&amp;title=osmonds-45s#15539</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Osm&#111;nds 45s :   The Hits Man wrote:There are...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3269&amp;PID=15445&amp;title=osmonds-45s#15445</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=12">Brian W.</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3269<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 15&nbsp;April&nbsp;2008 at 9:11pm<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><img src="forum_images/quote_box.png" title="Originally posted by The Hits Man" alt="Originally posted by The Hits Man" style="vertical-align: text-bottom;" /> <strong>The Hits Man wrote:</strong><br /><br />There are no edited versions.</td></tr></table> <br /><br />Not true, Grant.  "Love Me for a Reason" is an early fade.  But the single was mono, and it definitely was not a fold-down (I tried it), so in a strict sense the "true" 45 version cannot be recreated.  (Unlike the mono promo edit of Ringo Starr's "Oh My My," which absolutely is a fold-down.)]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 21:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3269&amp;PID=15445&amp;title=osmonds-45s#15445</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Osm&#111;nds 45s : The same question holds true for...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3269&amp;PID=15430&amp;title=osmonds-45s#15430</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=156">eriejwg</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3269<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 15&nbsp;April&nbsp;2008 at 12:29pm<br /><br />The same question holds true for "Yo-Yo", there is a version vs length designation. Edit points, or a different mix?]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3269&amp;PID=15430&amp;title=osmonds-45s#15430</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Osm&#111;nds 45s :   eriejwg wrote:Chatted with...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3269&amp;PID=15429&amp;title=osmonds-45s#15429</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=52">sriv94</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3269<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 15&nbsp;April&nbsp;2008 at 12:20pm<br /><br /> <table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><img src="forum_images/quote_box.png" title="Originally posted by eriejwg" alt="Originally posted by eriejwg" style="vertical-align: text-bottom;" /> <strong>eriejwg wrote:</strong><br /><br />Chatted with Doug and he thought "Love Me For A Reason" was an early fade. The database gives a 'version' designation vs. a 'length' designation. <br /></td></tr></table><br /><br />I hadn't seen that changed--it used to be a "length" designation (not that I don't look in the database, but I don't usually use it to find Osmonds material :) ).<br /><br />So I'm probably wrong and there must be something other than fadeout, otherwise it wouldn't have been changed.  So I'll second John's question.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3269&amp;PID=15429&amp;title=osmonds-45s#15429</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>