https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/ Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Mon, 04 May 2026 19:17:32 +0000 Wed, 06 Aug 2008 15:43:29 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 12.07 360 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=480 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum//images/Top-40-Music-on-CD-Forum-Logo.png https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/ https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=480&PID=18026&title=randy-meisner-never-been-in-love#18026 Author: eriejwg
Subject: 480
Posted: 06 August 2008 at 3:43pm

Gordon, thanks for the details! I always want to create a proper 45 length.]]> Wed, 06 Aug 2008 15:43:29 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=480&PID=18026&title=randy-meisner-never-been-in-love#18026 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=480&PID=18022&title=randy-meisner-never-been-in-love#18022 Author: EdisonLite
Subject: 480
Posted: 06 August 2008 at 11:32am

It starts at 3:28.]]> Wed, 06 Aug 2008 11:32:05 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=480&PID=18022&title=randy-meisner-never-been-in-love#18022 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=480&PID=17990&title=randy-meisner-never-been-in-love#17990 Author: eriejwg
Subject: 480
Posted: 05 August 2008 at 10:03am

Can anyone indicate timewise when the fade begins to end at 3:39 for the 45 length?]]> Tue, 05 Aug 2008 10:03:23 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=480&PID=17990&title=randy-meisner-never-been-in-love#17990 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=480&PID=17969&title=randy-meisner-never-been-in-love#17969 Author: Todd Ireland
Subject: 480
Posted: 04 August 2008 at 8:59pm

According to abagon, the actual commercial 45 run time of Randy Meisner's "Never Been in Love" is 3:39, not 3:36 as stated on the record label.]]> Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:59:59 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=480&PID=17969&title=randy-meisner-never-been-in-love#17969 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=480&PID=2479&title=randy-meisner-never-been-in-love#2479 Author: EdisonLite
Subject: 480
Posted: 30 October 2005 at 7:49pm

Sorry, I meant Wounded Bird. I mix up those labels as they are both small reissue labels that specialize in '70s and '80s reissues that the big labels would never touch.]]> Sun, 30 Oct 2005 19:49:56 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=480&PID=2479&title=randy-meisner-never-been-in-love#2479 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=480&PID=2478&title=randy-meisner-never-been-in-love#2478 Author: Moderator
Subject: 480
Posted: 30 October 2005 at 7:34pm

Yes I agree with you on LP and 45 length not version. You mention that you found this song on a "One Way" cd? I was not aware that "One Way" ever issued this cd so could you pass along the catalog number so I can search for a copy?]]> Sun, 30 Oct 2005 19:34:42 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=480&PID=2478&title=randy-meisner-never-been-in-love#2478 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=480&PID=2472&title=randy-meisner-never-been-in-love#2472 Author: EdisonLite
Subject: 480
Posted: 30 October 2005 at 3:34pm

Though your database isn't up right now, I recall you distinguished the two versions of this song as "version", whereas I thought they differed by "length". I did feel the longer version on the self-titled One Way CD was mastered so bright (compared to the 45 recording on "Forever Pop Vol. 1") that the guitars may have seemed louder on the One Way CD -- but do you feel there is a different mix for the single version -- or anything that prevents these two as being distinguished by "length?" Maybe I missed other mix elements??]]> Sun, 30 Oct 2005 15:34:23 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=480&PID=2472&title=randy-meisner-never-been-in-love#2472