<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>Top 40 Music on CD Forum : &quot;Let&#146;s Get It &#079;n&quot; - Marvin Gaye</title>
  <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; Top 40 Music on CD Forum : Chat Board  : &quot;Let&#146;s Get It &#079;n&quot; - Marvin Gaye]]></description>
  <copyright>Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
  <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 13:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2017 19:38:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.07</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=4836</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[&quot;Let&#146;s Get It &#079;n&quot; - Marvin Gaye : LP version (about 4:51)  I have...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4836&amp;PID=47505&amp;title=lets-get-it-on-marvin-gaye#47505</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=89">crapfromthepast</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4836<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 02&nbsp;June&nbsp;2017 at 7:38pm<br /><br /><strong>LP version (about 4:51)</strong><br /><br />I have the LP version on just three discs.<br /><br />Motown's 4-CD <em>The Master 1961-1984</em> (1995) sounds quite nice.  Good dynamic range, nice EQ, no noise reduction, decent source tapes.<br /><br />Time-Life's 2-CD <em>Body Talk Vol. 4 Together Forever</em> (1996) uses a different analog transfer than <em>The Master</em>, but has sound comparable in quality to <em>The Master</em>.  Time-Life's 2-CD <em>Body And Soul Vol. 6 Love Under Cover</em> (1999) is a differently-EQ'd digital clone of <em>Body Talk</em>.<br /><br />Any of these three discs are good choices for the LP version.  I chose <em>The Master</em> for my library, just because it's the oldest.  (Pretty arbitrary, indeed.)<br /><br /><strong>45 version (about 3:59)</strong><br /><br />To get the 45 from the LP version on <em>The Master 1961-1984</em>, delete the 48 beats from 3:05.4 to 3:39.5 (both edits falling a half-beat before a downbeat), and fade what you have left from 3:40 to 4:02.  The faded portion is 4:14 to 4:36 in the LP version.<br /><br />The first CD to include the 45 version was actually one of the very first CDs put out by Motown, or any other label for that matter - Motown's <em>Compact Command Performances 15 Greatest Hits</em> (1983).  I'd rate the sound here as pretty good, but not quite as good as <em>The Master</em>.  I'd expect the source tape for the 45 to be a higher generation than the LP version, since you need a generation to do the edit.  And this is a very nice analog transfer of that tape, with a very long tail on the fade, and no noise reduction. The same analog transfer turns up on a whole bunch of CDs:<ul><li>Motown's <em>25 #1 Hits From 25 Years Vol. 2</em> (1985) - digitally exactly 0.98 dB louder</li><li>Motown's <em>Biggest Pop Hits All No. 1 On Billboard's Charts</em> (1986) - differently-EQ'd digital clone</li><li>Rhino's <em>Billboard Top R&R Hits 1973</em> (1988) - yes, the Rhino disc is based on this disc!</li><li>Time-Life's <em>Sounds Of The Seventies Vol. 6 1973</em> (1990) - digitally identical to the Rhino disc</li><li>Razor & Tie's 2-CD <em>Sweet '70s Soul</em> (1991)</li><li>Sony's 2-CD <em>35 Years Of Rock And Roll</em> (1992)</li><li>PolyGram's promo <em>PGD Presents Sound Savers Vol. 2</em> (1992) - differently EQ'd digital clone</li><li>PolyGram's promo <em>PGD Presents Sound Savers Vol. 5</em> (1994) - digitally exactly 1 dB quieter</li><li>Time-Life's <em>Solid Gold Soul Vol. 8 1973</em> (1996) - digitally exactly 0.4 dB quieter than Rhino disc</li><li>Time-Life's <em>Solid Gold Soul #1 Love Songs Of The '70s</em> (2000) - probably digitally identical to <em>Solid Gold Soul Vol. 8 1973</em></li></ul>If that had been all there was, we'd be pretty happy.  All of the above sound pretty good.<br /><br />But Bill Inglot must have found some magical source tapes for Motown's 4-CD <em>Hitsville USA Vol. 2</em> (1993), because it sounds <em>dazzling</em> here - better than all of the above.  As with all of the above, this version has good dynamic range, nice EQ, and no noise reduction.  But it has <em>so</em> much presence, especially compared side-by-side with the above discs.  These CDs use the same analog transfer as <em>Hitsville</em>:<ul><li>Motown's <em>Motown Year By Year 1973</em> (1995) - digitally identical</li><li>MCA's 3-CD <em>Soul Train 25th Anniversary Hall Of Fame</em> (1995) - differently-EQ'd digital clone</li></ul>Some outliers that aren't based on the masterings from any of the above:<ul><li>Motown's <em>20th Century Masters The Millennium Collection Vol. 2 The '70s</em> (2000) - not as good as any of the above</li><li>Time-Life's <em>Legends Of Soul Vol. 2 Marvin Gaye</em> (2001) - sounds is on par with <em>Compact Command Performances 15 Greatest Hits</em></li><li>Silver Eagle's 3-CD <em>Motown 25th Anniversary Collection</em> (copyright 1983) - horrendous sound, and fades a bit early; there's no reason to own this collection</li></ul>My recommendation for the 45 edit is clear: <strong>Motown's 4-CD <em>Hitsville USA Vol. 2</em> (1993)</strong>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2017 19:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4836&amp;PID=47505&amp;title=lets-get-it-on-marvin-gaye#47505</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[&quot;Let&#146;s Get It &#079;n&quot; - Marvin Gaye : The actual commercial 45 run time...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4836&amp;PID=21944&amp;title=lets-get-it-on-marvin-gaye#21944</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=17">Todd Ireland</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4836<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 13&nbsp;April&nbsp;2009 at 8:38am<br /><br />The actual commercial 45 run time of Marvin Gaye's "Let's Get It On" is 3:59.  (Thanks to my good friend Jim for providing the timing info.  The printed record label time is 3:58.)  I only mention this because database CD containing a "45 version" comment for this song run 3:56-4:02. ]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 08:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4836&amp;PID=21944&amp;title=lets-get-it-on-marvin-gaye#21944</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>