<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>Top 40 Music on CD Forum : Expose - Let Me Be The &#079;ne</title>
  <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; Top 40 Music on CD Forum : Chat Board  : Expose - Let Me Be The &#079;ne]]></description>
  <copyright>Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
  <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 07:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 07:05:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.07</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=5441</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Expose - Let Me Be The &#079;ne : Isn&amp;#039;t there also a difference...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5441&amp;PID=25634&amp;title=expose-let-me-be-the-one#25634</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=180">mstgator</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5441<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 27&nbsp;March&nbsp;2010 at 7:05am<br /><br />Isn't there also a difference in the final chorus?  The single version has one "Let me be the one" that's mixed almost acappella; I think that's missing in the LP version.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 07:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5441&amp;PID=25634&amp;title=expose-let-me-be-the-one#25634</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Expose - Let Me Be The &#079;ne : If you don&amp;#039;t have the 45...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5441&amp;PID=25601&amp;title=expose-let-me-be-the-one#25601</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=635">NightAire</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5441<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 25&nbsp;March&nbsp;2010 at 10:17pm<br /><br />If you don't have the 45 edit on CD but have the album version, here's how to chop it down to a SIMILAR but NOT IDENTICAL edit:<br /><br />#1 - Take out :08 - :17.<br /><br />#2 - On your new edit, take out :18 - :27.<br /><br />#3 - (The only tricky edit) Take out 1:35 - 1:44 on the downbeat.  There's no wiggle room here, you're jumping from the end of one lyric right to the beginning of another lyric.<br /><br />That's it!<br /><br />HOWEVER...<br /><br />You will now find you have a file 3:53 in length...  not long enough!  (That's the only difference I could find.)<br /><br />The 45 actually fades LATER in the performance than the LP (at least 5 seconds).  It's also possible that (believe it or not) the 45 may be slightly SLOWER than the LP...  I was working from a video, so no guarantees on that one.<br /><br />Based on this, I would suggest that the (incorrect) time of the label of the 45 may be a result of timing the edited LP version...  it appears for some reason they went back & edited from the original master tracks, resulting in a slightly later fade, but the label was never changed.<br /><br />I'd love to hear the story behind THAT one!  :)]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5441&amp;PID=25601&amp;title=expose-let-me-be-the-one#25601</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>