https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/ Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Fri, 08 May 2026 00:16:04 +0000 Sun, 26 Feb 2012 07:50:16 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 12.07 360 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=716 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum//images/Top-40-Music-on-CD-Forum-Logo.png https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/ https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=716&PID=33021&title=chicago-wishing-you-were-here#33021 Author: KentT
Subject: 716
Posted: 26 February 2012 at 7:50am

TMS I think is actually TML (The Mastering Lab) mastering studios in California. S and M are lathe codes. Doug Sax being their best known mastering engineer. ]]> Sun, 26 Feb 2012 07:50:16 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=716&PID=33021&title=chicago-wishing-you-were-here#33021 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=716&PID=32996&title=chicago-wishing-you-were-here#32996 Author: Hykker
Subject: 716
Posted: 24 February 2012 at 6:43am

Yah Shure wrote: Perhaps there's a difference in the promo pressings. Mine's a Terre Haute copy, although its typical "TI" designation is etched only on the long version side of this one.

My copy does seem to be from another plant..."short version" is in a different font, and the "black sun" (or whatever that is) is in a different place. Then again since both the surf intro and the sustained ending fade slowly, maybe the :03 difference just gets lost in surface noise (surface noise on a Columbia single...who 'da thunk? ).

Not up on my pressing plant codes, but mine has a TMS-S stamped in the run-out area on the short version side and TMS-M on the long version. Both sides are stereo.]]> Fri, 24 Feb 2012 06:43:13 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=716&PID=32996&title=chicago-wishing-you-were-here#32996 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=716&PID=32983&title=chicago-wishing-you-were-here#32983 Author: eriejwg
Subject: 716
Posted: 22 February 2012 at 10:47pm

I created a file running 3:03 using the 40th Anniversary
short version and part of the intro/the ending from the
longer version.]]> Wed, 22 Feb 2012 22:47:36 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=716&PID=32983&title=chicago-wishing-you-were-here#32983 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=716&PID=32981&title=chicago-wishing-you-were-here#32981 Author: Yah Shure
Subject: 716
Posted: 22 February 2012 at 8:13pm

Steve, I just double-checked mine and it still came out to 3:03. That's with the fade-in and fade-out maximized in the wav editor to pinpoint the exact start and end; however, for all practical purposes - i.e. carting it up for radio play in 1974 - 3:00 would be the more realistic figure.

Perhaps there's a difference in the promo pressings. Mine's a Terre Haute copy, although its typical "TI" designation is etched only on the long version side of this one.]]> Wed, 22 Feb 2012 20:13:29 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=716&PID=32981&title=chicago-wishing-you-were-here#32981 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=716&PID=32980&title=chicago-wishing-you-were-here#32980 Author: Hykker
Subject: 716
Posted: 22 February 2012 at 7:18pm

Yah Shure wrote: short version (3:03) (2:54 listed)

Mine timed out to 3:00 exactly. ]]> Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:18:13 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=716&PID=32980&title=chicago-wishing-you-were-here#32980 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=716&PID=32973&title=chicago-wishing-you-were-here#32973 Author: Todd Ireland
Subject: 716
Posted: 22 February 2012 at 3:42pm

Thanks, Yah Shure!]]> Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:42:54 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=716&PID=32973&title=chicago-wishing-you-were-here#32973 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=716&PID=32970&title=chicago-wishing-you-were-here#32970 Author: Yah Shure
Subject: 716
Posted: 22 February 2012 at 2:19pm

DJ 45 actual timings:

short version (3:03) (2:54 listed)

long version (4:34) (4:26 listed)

Edited by Yah Shure]]> Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:19:54 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=716&PID=32970&title=chicago-wishing-you-were-here#32970 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=716&PID=32959&title=chicago-wishing-you-were-here#32959 Author: Todd Ireland
Subject: 716
Posted: 21 February 2012 at 11:59pm

The database currently states the following general comment for Chicago's "Wishing You Were Here":

(dj copies of this 45 ran (2:54) and (4:26); commercial copies were all (4:34) not (4:26) as stated on the record label)

Given the discrepancy between the printed and actual commercial 45 times, I suspect that the long DJ 45 length of 4:26 is probably the printed label time but not the actual run time. And considering the lone database CD appearance of the short DJ edit runs 2:59, it's very possible the database's listed 2:54 time for the short DJ 45 side is inaccurate as well. So does anyone have a copy of the "Wishing You Were Here" DJ 45 who can report the actual run time of both sides?

Edited by Todd Ireland]]> Tue, 21 Feb 2012 23:59:38 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=716&PID=32959&title=chicago-wishing-you-were-here#32959 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=716&PID=3680&title=chicago-wishing-you-were-here#3680 Author: edtop40
Subject: 716
Posted: 13 February 2006 at 9:01pm

pat

the actual run time of the 45 is 4:34 and NOT 4:26 as stated of the 45's label..

edtop40]]> Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:01:18 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=716&PID=3680&title=chicago-wishing-you-were-here#3680