https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/ Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Wed, 06 May 2026 02:31:26 +0000 Wed, 22 Jul 2020 17:24:13 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 12.07 360 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=7629 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum//images/Top-40-Music-on-CD-Forum-Logo.png https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/ https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=7629&PID=55004&title=all-for-you-janet-jackson#55004 Author: Brian W.
Subject: 7629
Posted: 22 July 2020 at 5:24pm

The "Intro Edit" that Rich has is interesting. It runs a
hair slower than the Radio Edit, and also fades a second
or two earlier. Other than that, it appears to be
identical to the Radio Edit, but with everything up to
Janet's "Chicka-ahh" deleted. Not sure what the source
of this is... I can find no reference to it online. The
slight difference in speed is what intrigues me the
most.]]> Wed, 22 Jul 2020 17:24:13 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=7629&PID=55004&title=all-for-you-janet-jackson#55004 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=7629&PID=54996&title=all-for-you-janet-jackson#54996 Author: PopArchivist
Subject: 7629
Posted: 19 July 2020 at 8:11pm

Brian W. wrote: Is there just one "chicka-ahh" at the beginning, or more than one? Is it just the Radio Edit with everything before that sliced off? Because that would put it at 4:05. I went through every entry on Discogs and don't see anything with a runtime even close to 4:04 except the Top Heavy Mix.

Check your PM. Then let me know what you think.]]> Sun, 19 Jul 2020 20:11:51 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=7629&PID=54996&title=all-for-you-janet-jackson#54996 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=7629&PID=54995&title=all-for-you-janet-jackson#54995 Author: Brian W.
Subject: 7629
Posted: 19 July 2020 at 3:55pm

Is there just one "chicka-ahh" at the beginning, or more
than one? Is it just the Radio Edit with everything
before that sliced off? Because that would put it at
4:05.

I went through every entry on Discogs and don't see
anything with a runtime even close to 4:04 except the
Top Heavy Mix.]]> Sun, 19 Jul 2020 15:55:55 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=7629&PID=54995&title=all-for-you-janet-jackson#54995 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=7629&PID=54993&title=all-for-you-janet-jackson#54993 Author: PopArchivist
Subject: 7629
Posted: 19 July 2020 at 11:14am

Can anyone identify where the [Intro Edit] comes from? I have a 4:04 that appears official but no idea where it originated from. Is this an official radio edit possibly from the UK?

Starts out with a chica chica sound and the instrumental for a few seconds and then Janet starting the chorus about 7-8 seconds into it.

Edited by PopArchivist]]> Sun, 19 Jul 2020 11:14:17 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=7629&PID=54993&title=all-for-you-janet-jackson#54993 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=7629&PID=38855&title=all-for-you-janet-jackson#38855 Author: Todd Ireland
Subject: 7629
Posted: 17 August 2013 at 2:02am

The database currently shows the following general comment for Janet Jackson's "All for You":

(dj copies of this cd single contain the )

This certainly looks like another one of those instances where a technical glitch caused the rest of the comment to get cut off due to quotation marks being present. ]]> Sat, 17 Aug 2013 02:02:53 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=7629&PID=38855&title=all-for-you-janet-jackson#38855