https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/ Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Sat, 02 May 2026 10:07:03 +0000 Wed, 03 May 2023 15:57:50 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 12.07 360 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=915 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum//images/Top-40-Music-on-CD-Forum-Logo.png https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/ https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=915&PID=62960&title=wang-chung-lets-go#62960 Author: EternalStatic
Subject: 915
Posted: 03 May 2023 at 3:57pm

The “New Mix” on the re-serviced 45 is an edit of “Shep’s Mix” 12” version.
(It also has what sounds like a bad edit at about four seconds in, where the
cut to bring the kick drum in was about one percussion tick too late, but
otherwise it’s a fun edit.)]]> Wed, 03 May 2023 15:57:50 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=915&PID=62960&title=wang-chung-lets-go#62960 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=915&PID=62959&title=wang-chung-lets-go#62959 Author: NightAire
Subject: 915
Posted: 03 May 2023 at 12:46pm

Thanks, John!]]> Wed, 03 May 2023 12:46:42 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=915&PID=62959&title=wang-chung-lets-go#62959 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=915&PID=62958&title=wang-chung-lets-go#62958 Author: eriejwg
Subject: 915
Posted: 03 May 2023 at 12:23pm

Gene,

I just listened to the 4:39 NEW MIX and that is definitely
not what I heard and played on the radio in 1987. We
played the 45 version that runs 4:03.]]> Wed, 03 May 2023 12:23:33 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=915&PID=62958&title=wang-chung-lets-go#62958 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=915&PID=62957&title=wang-chung-lets-go#62957 Author: NightAire
Subject: 915
Posted: 03 May 2023 at 12:03pm

Is the 4:39 New Mix / New Edit Jim identified above ACTUALLY a new mix, and does anybody know which edit / mix radio played most at the time?]]> Wed, 03 May 2023 12:03:38 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=915&PID=62957&title=wang-chung-lets-go#62957 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=915&PID=46868&title=wang-chung-lets-go#46868 Author: eriejwg
Subject: 915
Posted: 27 January 2017 at 12:32pm

Just realized this thread existed. I had a copy of the
45, that ran 4:03, and I have since misfiled it.

Since I can't locate my 45, my question from the other
"Let's Go" recreation thread, is: Does the 45 fade
earlier, or a new question, does the 45 run faster?]]> Fri, 27 Jan 2017 12:32:25 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=915&PID=46868&title=wang-chung-lets-go#46868 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=915&PID=24713&title=wang-chung-lets-go#24713 Author: jimct
Subject: 915
Posted: 31 December 2009 at 3:01pm

Bumping up this thread for Doug....]]> Thu, 31 Dec 2009 15:01:50 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=915&PID=24713&title=wang-chung-lets-go#24713 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=915&PID=13354&title=wang-chung-lets-go#13354 Author: crapfromthepast
Subject: 915
Posted: 06 December 2007 at 12:19pm

Not sure which of my posts you're referring to, so here are notes from "Let's Go":

My preferred version comes from the Mosaic CD. I didn't take detailed notes as to which sections to grab from the LP version, but the final mixdown has edits at 3:24, 3:36 and 3:47. It has a running time of 4:07, including outro silence (don't know how long it is without the outro silence). You can also raise the levels 3 dB without clipping.

My notes also say that Time-Life's Modern Rock 1984-1989 (2000) is digitally exactly 1.5 dB quieter than both Sounds Of The Eighties 1987 (1995) and Rock On 1987 (1996); all are too loud and clip.]]> Thu, 06 Dec 2007 12:19:14 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=915&PID=13354&title=wang-chung-lets-go#13354 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=915&PID=13352&title=wang-chung-lets-go#13352 Author: eriejwg
Subject: 915
Posted: 06 December 2007 at 11:28am

Just got a stock 45 in for this. Would've edited the LP version had I found Ron G.'s post in time. Listed time of the stock concurs with Jim's findings. Listed is 3:49; actual is 4:03. Deadwax is 7-28531-A-SH1]]> Thu, 06 Dec 2007 11:28:06 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=915&PID=13352&title=wang-chung-lets-go#13352 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=915&PID=4749&title=wang-chung-lets-go#4749 Author: jimct
Subject: 915
Posted: 08 May 2006 at 2:44am

The stock and first-issued promo 45s have a stated time of (3:49), but actually run (4:03). A few weeks later, in comes a second promo for it, loudly blaring "NEW MIX" on the left side of the label, and "NEW EDIT" on the right. Listed time is (4:36), says (Edit/Remix) just below it, and actually runs (4:39). First promo only specified (Edit). ]]> Mon, 08 May 2006 02:44:10 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=915&PID=4749&title=wang-chung-lets-go#4749