![]() |
Bonnie Tyler - Total Eclipse (dj edit #2) |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Author | |
aaronk ![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 88 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 30 August 2007 at 10:56pm |
According to the database, there are two different DJ edits for Bonnie Tyler's "Total Eclipse of the Heart." One runs (4:43), which has appeared on a handful of CDs; the other runs (4:36).
Does anyone know if the (4:36) DJ version is an early fade of the (4:43) version, or if it is a completely different edit? Any help is appreciated. |
|
![]() |
|
jimct ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I hope to finally eliminate all the confusion for this song, once and for all. Despite all of the different listed times, appearing on various promo 45s, I have only ever found TWO actual times on a 45; (4:43) and (5:31). The first promo 45 we got in to the station had a listed (4:29), actual (5:31) length, on both sides. These are the EXACT same listed/actual timings that appear on my commercial 45. The second promo 45 we received has a listed (4:36) version on one side, with (Edited Version) appearing under the title. This (4:36) listed version has an actual time of (4:43). The other side of this second promo 45 has a listed time of (5:21), but it is actually the same (5:31) version that appeared on the first promo/commercial 45. Translation:
-If your 45 states a time of either (4:29) or (5:21), it actually runs (5:31). -If your 45 states a time of (4:36), it actually runs (4:43). In conclusion, despite listed 45 times of (4:29), (4:36) and (5:21), which appear on various stock/promo 45s for "Total Eclipse Of The Heart", none of these listed times are accurate, and do not actually exist, on any 45, in any of these lengths. Edited by jimct |
|
![]() |
|
torcan ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 23 June 2006 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks jimct. This is one of my favorite songs and I've always wondered why the timings were so mixed up on the 45s. It is a fairly long song, so I wonder if they put the 4:29 timing on there on purpose in an effort to get more stations to program the song(?) Even in 1983, a 5 1/2 minute song was kind of long to hear on the average station.
Oddly enough, the Canadian 45 has no timing listed, but on the Canadian oldie-series single, it was listed as 5:30. |
|
![]() |
|
aaronk ![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 88 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Jim, you are my promo 45 hero! Excellent information that I'm sure Pat will appreciate for the database as much as I do for my own knowledge, sir.
|
|
![]() |
|
TimNeely ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 09 January 2008 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
To add to this discussion:
I'm pretty sure the "4:29" on the label was done to foster airplay, like the "3:05" on the stock copies of "You've Lost That Lovin' Feelin'" by the Righteous Brothers. Sure, once it was screened by a PD, he'd have realized he'd been taken, but he would not have rejected the record on length alone. It wouldn't surprise me at all that, unless a record was by one of the hottest acts in America at the time (e.g. The Beatles in the 60s, Elton John in the mid-70s), many long records were thrown on the discard pile without even a listen. The 4:43 version, by the way, matches the British single version; that edit appears on the earliest U.K. Now That's What I Call Music! LP, released in 1983. |
|
![]() |
|
Hykker ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 30 October 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Considering that by 1983 most stations were playing their music off carts, certainly the music director would have noticed that the song was considerably longer than labeled when the 5:00 cart he used recued in mid-song, though as you say if he was carting it up, most likely the decision to add it had already been made. Keep in mind that this was produced by Jim Steinman, who was on a roll around that time, that likely factored into adding the song. As you said, Bonnie wasn't exactly a "must add" act, only having had one previous hit 5 years earlier (and nothing of any significance afterwards either). The 4:43 version must be quite rare...I've never seen a copy. I have maybe 5 copies of the song, some promo some stock and all are the "4:29" version. |
|
![]() |
|
edtop40 ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 29 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
my commercial 45 issued as columbia 03906 states a run time on the label as 4:29 but actually runs 5:31......in addition, the versions in the db that run 5:33 run 0:02 longer than the 45......if you fade out the last 0:03 from 5:28 to 5:31 you'll be able to replicate the proper 45 version.......my guess is that the 5:25/5:26 running time cd versions fade out prematurely.....can anyone confirm this.....
|
|
edtop40
|
|
![]() |
|
prisdeej ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 02 July 2011 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This thread is older, and has been discussed in great detail by Jim, although yet again I've been fooled by TM. They state a 'Short Version' listed on GoldDisc 120. The cut (4:30 with silence), and a :07 intro. The fade starts at (4:15), until the audio is silent at (4:25).
I'm wondering if TM faded the (4:43) actual edited version down :18 early. Out of instinct would they want to match the (4:29) listed time on the promo? Just a theory. Does anyone have a copy of the (4:43) edited version so I may compare? |
|
DJ L.
|
|
![]() |
|
crapfromthepast ![]() Music Fan ![]() ![]() Joined: 14 September 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 9 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It's been a while since I did my comparisons for this song, so I don't have editing instructions handy.
The versions around 6:58 are the LP version from Faster Than The Speed Of Night. I have this on PolyTel Canada's Rock With The '80s (1990), Sony's 2-CD Read The Hits (1994), and Realm's 3-CD Greatest Hits Of '80s Vol. 1 (1995). The 4:43 promo 45 edit turns up on Time-Life's 2-CD Heart Rock (1988; faded a little early), Columbia's Rock Of The 80's (1988), Columbia's Seems Like Yesterday Vol. 4 (1990), Time-Life's Sounds Of The Eighties Vol. 16 The Early '80s (1996; different-EQ'd digital clone of Heart Rock, so fades a little early), and Warner Special Products' 2-CD Touched By Love (1997; same analog transfer as Heart Rock, so fades a little early). The 5:31 version from the promo and commercial 45s turns up on Sony's 3-CD After The Love (1991; faded a little early), Razor & Tie's 2-CD Forever '80s (1994; sounds very close to After The Love and fades slightly early), Rhino's Billboard Top Hits 1983 (1992), Time-Life's 2-CD Body Talk Vol. 1 Forever Yours (1996; differently EQ'd digital clone of Billboard disc), and Rhino's 7-CD Like Omigod box (2002). There's one more edit that's out there on CD. A version running 4:27 (including outro silence so it's a second or two shorter than 4:27) turns up on EMI UK's 2-CD Now 1983 (1993) and on Madacy's Rock On 1983 Vol. 2 (2005). I don't have specific edit points handy, but I noted to myself that there's an additional edit at the end of the song, compared with the 4:43 version. I suspect that this may be the UK single version, but can't confirm. Edited by crapfromthepast |
|
![]() |
|
NightAire ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 20 February 2010 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'd LOVE to know if that 4:27-ish version is the UK edit, or something else... I actually see a couple of references to it in the database. Hm!
Also, it might be worth mentioning that she re-recorded the song for her album "Wings" in 2010. I don't have a copy but have heard it; it is obviously different because of the chorus behind her, her being the only "lead" (singing both parts), and the faster tempo / shorter length. Also, if you thought her vocals were shredded on the original, you won't believe the remake... she sounds like she smoked a case a day for a month, screaming at the top of her lungs every day when she wasn't smoking... yet this even grittier version sounds even more passionate. I like it as an alternative! Here's some info about it from Wikipedia Edited by NightAire |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |