![]() |
clarification for "longer than the 45" |
Post Reply ![]() |
Author | |
aaronk ![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Online Points: 84 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 28 May 2006 at 11:50pm |
In many instances, the database indicates that a song is ":xx longer than the 45 version." When this comment is used, does that ALWAYS mean that the difference in length occurs at the end? In other words, it has a longer fade.
The reason I ask is because there are some instances where the comment "longer fade" is actually used. Can anyone clarify? Pat? |
|
![]() |
|
Todd Ireland ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 18 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I believe the ":xx longer than the 45 version" comment means the difference in length does occur at the end, Aaron. As for the "longer fade" comment, Pat is welcome to correct me if I'm wrong but I've always taken this to mean that the fade starts at an earlier point in a song than usual, therefore making it a longer fade. Am I right?
|
|
![]() |
|
Pat Downey ![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 01 October 2003 Status: Offline Points: 1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
You are right on the meaning of "longer than the 45 version" as the difference would always occur at the end of the song. I did not intend for the "longer fade" comment to be interpreted as the fade beginning at an earlier point in the song but rather more in line with just being longer than previous releases. Technically I should have entered the :xx longer comment if you come across any of these I would be happy to change the comment.
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
|
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |