![]() |
Elmo & Patsy-Grandma Got Run Over By... |
Post Reply
|
Page <1234> |
| Author | ||
jimct
Music Fan
Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 December 2013 at 3:37pm |
|
|
Aaron, reading John's release sequence in his post, I initially thought
that, too. But then, when I browsed the song's label scans attachment he provided, all of the non-Epic 45s had both the 1979 copyright date, and the stock #s I'd originally documented. Today, I acquired the 1982 Oink LP, that 80smusicfreak was thankfully razor sharp to spot for us. (It went unsold at an expired eBay auction last week, so I contacted the seller, who kindly reposted it for me, as a "Buy It Now" item.) I have found only one other early 80s Oink 45 by the duo - "Christmas Millionaire" (OK-RA47). It appears to have a 1983 copyright date (only a lowres scan is now available.) I also bought that item today. No flip side info was noted or scanned, so I'll find out when I receive it. For us, the easiest solution here would be that the newly recorded "Grandma..." was placed on this 45's B-side. (It's not unprecedented to place an old hit as the B-side of a newer 45 release.) FYI, "Christmas Millionaire" does not appear at all on their Oink/Epic LP. If "Grandma..." does not appear as the B-side of "Christmas Millionaire", I am then getting fairly close to concluding that Oink never actually did re-issue "Grandma...." as a 45, in its re-recorded, 1982 incarnation, and that the 1984 Epic 45 release was that version's initial single release. More details to follow...... Edited by jimct |
||
![]() |
||
Yah Shure
Music Fan
Joined: 11 December 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 December 2013 at 6:25pm |
|
You are correct, Aaron. The 1983 Oink remake is the same version that Epic reissued in 1984, and I've added that clarification to my earlier post. As for the confusion Oink caused by retaining the 1979 release's catalog number, the answer probably rests with Grandma. Interestingly enough, the Epic 45 doesn't sound nearly as good as the '83 Oink 45. It's cut a bit quieter, with highs and lows attenuated. The pig beats the eye in this race, even if the pressing quality isn't quite on par. Jim, my promo copy of "Christmas Millionaire" is a double A-sider, on a green label, pressed on vinyl by PRC. It came in a clear plastic sleeve, to keep the record, its sleeve and the wraparound title card together. I was never serviced with any Oink LP. |
||
![]() |
||
jimct
Music Fan
Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 December 2013 at 11:50pm |
|
|
John, thanks a million for the "it states a 1979 copyright, it has the exact
same Oink stock # as the 1979 Oink pressing, it has the exact same 45 label wording (right down to the letter), but the Oink 45 that you show actually includes the re-recorded version of 'Grandma...' that would soon appear on the Epic 45" info. I can't say that I've had too many other instances of a release scenario playing out quite that way (if at all), in my extensive research travels - it's pretty counter-intuitive. But there's a first for everything! The only Oink 45 "incarnation" for "Grandma..." that I happen to own, but that John didn't include in his very helpful photobucket 45 montage, is for the cream-colored label Oink 45, which actually states "Oink" on the label. Ironically, that happens to be the very first copy of it I ever owned - the one I purchased from Abe, up in Albany, NY. However, there does appear to be *one* distinguishing factor, though, between John's Oink 2984 45 and my Oink 2984 45 - the color used on the label. John's Oink 45 copy is on a white label, whereas my Oink 45 copy is on a cream-colored label. Might this label color difference be the *only* way to distinguish between these two different Oink 45 recordings, short of playing them? That's how it now looks to me...... Luckily, I bought 3 different "Grandma..."-related items on Friday morning: The Oink LP, the "Christmas Millionaire" 45 (thanks for the double A-side info, John; now I know what to expect there), and an Oink 2984 45 on the white label, simply because I didn't previously own a copy of it on a white label. But I've just now learned, with John's latest post, is that what I actually will be getting, when the latter arrives, will actually be the later recorded version of "Grandma....". (John, just as an aside, if were you looking to plug the one hole in your own "Grandma...." collection, I currently see a cream-colored, Oink 4984 45, for $4.49, as eBay item 251389434513 - another merchant has a copy for $4, but it happens to be offered by the *one* eBay merchant that I've had multiple instances of them way overstating the actual condition of their 45s, so buyer beware....) Edited by jimct |
||
![]() |
||
80smusicfreak
Music Fan
Joined: 14 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 December 2013 at 8:04am |
|
So, I actually helped make a contribution to your vast music collection, jimct??? Who'da thought??? :-) Glad you got it...
Since you now seem to be in "completist" mode when it comes to this Christmas classic, in the spirit of giving, I just thought I'd go ahead and point out that there's still another label variation of the 45 that you missed, and that's just from checking the two copies w/ the cream-colored labels on Oink 2984 that you steered Yah Shure toward! Let's start w/ the $4.49 one you recommended, from eBay seller "nokomis_fan": Cream-label variation #1 Look at the very bottom of the label - the last line is an area code (707) phone no. for Oink, which represents the label's hometown of Windsor, CA... Now let's go to the $4.00 one from eBay seller "annie3857", which I assume is "the *one* eBay merchant that [you]'ve had multiple instances of them way overstating the actual condition of their 45s": Cream-label variation #2 Again, look at the very bottom of the label on their copy - seems this one ALSO has an area code (415) phone no. (for San Francisco), in addition to that (707) no.! You really didn't notice that??? Seems your collection is still incomplete, jimct... ;-) |
||
![]() |
||
jimct
Music Fan
Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 December 2013 at 2:37pm |
|
|
I will spare the good folks on this board a long reply to your latest
comments, since you're clearly looking for another fight. I've been down this road with you before, and it's proven to be an unproductive waste of my time. My intention was to PM you instead, but then I thought, "Why bother?" Once again, I hope your latest comments made you feel better about yourself, 80smusicfreak. You maintaining a healthy level of self-esteem is very important to me. I will simply allow my 3500+ posts to speak for itself, regarding both my personal collection and my research abilities, and allow you to think whatever you like, good or bad, about my board contributions. I know that I don't happen to know everything. So how lucky is it for all of us that you do! Thanks again for your Oink LP assistance. Edited by jimct |
||
![]() |
||
80smusicfreak
Music Fan
Joined: 14 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 December 2013 at 3:53pm |
|
|
(*sigh*) In no way did I intend for my last post to be confrontational, jimct. So I apologize if it might have come across that way. (Geez, I even said "peace" at the end of my post to you yesterday.) I'm certainly a "completist" when it comes to certain artists, too, no question about it! And I really was being genuine about the size/scope of your music collection - while I've always admitted I'm not a huge fan of vinyl, that doesn't mean I don't think I'd have a blast if I could spend a whole day looking through it. :-) I honestly thought I'd spotted something new that would interest you (didn't say I already knew about it), because the label difference immediately jumped out at me when I checked the listings on eBay...
|
||
![]() |
||
jimct
Music Fan
Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 December 2013 at 4:34pm |
|
|
My bad then, 80smusicfreak...sorry. The tenor of an e-mail is sometimes
difficult to discern, as opposed to a conversation, where there's both voice inflection and facial expression to assist with "intent." I really thought I was sensing some "snarky" there - so glad I was mistaken. This board has always been, by far, the most civilized one I know. I appreciate that. All is well. Until next time, kind sir! :) |
||
![]() |
||
Yah Shure
Music Fan
Joined: 11 December 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 December 2013 at 4:57pm |
|
|
Jim, thanks for providing the information about that cream-colored label eBay listing, but I've done a tremendous amount of research on the subject, from which I've determined that admitting to owning any more than five copies of "Grandma" tends to make other people look askance at said individual in public, in addition to insisting that their kids maintain a safe distance of at least a hundred yards. This would cause a major scene at the Mall of America this time of year. Security tends to frown on such things, and, unlike the individual who recently tossed a thousand $1 bills from the fourth floor of the mall's rotunda - unannounced - on Black Friday, I'd rather not risk being banned for a year. Therefore, I must sadly leave any further detective work to you. ;)
There is another factor to consider in sorting this all out: the private-press aspect of the Oink 45(s). Like any other small-scale performers on a shoestring budget, Elmo 'N'/'n/& Patsy pressed up just enough copies to satisfy demand, based on their gigs and distributor/retail orders over the course of several years. That meant an initial pressing run of 500, then perhaps another 500, maybe another thousand or two, etc. Consequently, they would farm out their business to various manufacturers, depending on how many copies they needed at any given time and the associated per-unit costs (of the three Oink label 45s I have - including "Christmas Millionaire" - each one is pressed by a different manufacturer.) When it came time to re-record "Grandma," it probably made sense to E&P/Oink to retain the original catalog number and matrix numbers. It wasn't as though they had a plethora of other Oink singles vying for the marketplace; all they really cared about was having a record of "Grandma" available. Elmo no doubt felt that the re-recording significantly trumped the original, making it a better, more accurate representation of how the duo's sound had evolved, in addition to giving Oink a legs-up on the older version Soundwaves/NSD was still actively marketing. From a forward-thinking artist's standpoint, it made perfect sense: the new "Grandma" was the only one that mattered henceforth. Just be thankful Elmo didn't team up with Richard Carpenter! Given the press-on-demand nature of the Oink single, the white label copy you bought might not necessarily be the same version as the one I have. Remember that Clickettes record I mentioned upthread? "Grandma" on Oink is a much bigger roll of the "dice" than even that record. We're talking Forrest-Gump's-box-of-chocolates territory here. "Grandma" is arguably the textbook example of a truly grassroots-level recording effort that took several years, two versions and three different distribution channels to evolve and snowball into the runaway hit it became. It's a fascinating story, and we may never know exactly how many different incarnations of the Oink pressing there actually were. As you said, Jim, there's a first for everything. I'd say the most reliable way to determine an Oink 45's true lineage is by playing it. It's almost like sorting out the hog market reports on the radio years ago. Attention: Elmo and Richard Carpenter! Here's your next hit: "Barrows, gilts and grandmas always get me down...." ;) Edited by Yah Shure |
||
![]() |
||
EdisonLite
Music Fan
Joined: 18 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 257 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 December 2013 at 7:04am |
|
|
<Just be thankful Elmo didn't team up with Richard Carpenter!>
I wonder what some of their titles would be like .. Top Of the Reindeer Goodbye to Grandma (They Long To Be) Close to Elmo Please Mr. Reindeer We've Only Just Begun To Run Grandma Over Calling Grandmas of Interplanetary Craft I Won't Last a Day Without Patsy All You Get from Love is a Reindeer Touch Me When We're Running (Over Grandma) And excerpts of lyrics would include: *You can say there's no such thing as an unaltered, un-remixed Carpenters recording (but somewhere in the deep vaults, it exists) *Don't you remember I wanted private-press baby, you said you could only find an Epic disc baby, baby 'though I'd settle for Soundwaves baby, I love Oink, I really do! |
||
![]() |
||
Yah Shure
Music Fan
Joined: 11 December 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 December 2013 at 9:44am |
|
|
Gordon, those are hilarious!!
The video of "Calling Grandmas" could easily be set in a retirement community. Golf carts masquerading as UFOs... I'm in! Looking forward to the CD. ;) |
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page <1234> |
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |