|
Chambers Brothers - Time Has Come Today |
Post Reply 
|
Page 12> |
| Author | |
davidclark 
Music Fan 
Joined: 17 November 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 19 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Topic: Chambers Brothers - Time Has Come TodayPosted: 24 November 2005 at 7:36pm |
|
I recently noticed a difference between the mono and stereo versions of the "45 version (edit)" of The Chambers Brothers - Time Has Come Today.
In the mono version on Rock Classics Of The '60s, the break starts at 2:23 and ends with the "ohhhhhh" at 3:29 (running 1:06). In the stereo version on say Nuggets Vol. 3, the break starts at 2:25 and ends with the "ohhhhhh" at 3:23 (running :58). BUT, the mono version is a bit faster. The mono version indeed has a longer break, and it does sound a bit different to me. the overall length of the mono version being shorter too, can anyone confirm with an actual 45 that this mono version is indeed the mono 45. It would seem then that the stereo 45 edit is just not quite it! Man, this database has got me pulling my CDs and giving them another, closer listen, discovering stuff I didn't know I had! thanks Pat! |
|
|
dc1
|
|
 |
|
|
jimct
Music Fan
Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 July 2008 at 2:37pm |
|
My commercial 45 for this song, which is mono and confirmed as Columbia 44414, happens to be the rarer and shorter of the two 1968 commercial 45 releases. It has a listed time of (3:05), but an actual time of (3:09).
|
|
|
|
|
Todd Ireland
Music Fan
Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 23 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 March 2011 at 9:13pm |
|
Pat:
The database currently displays a "45 version" comment for each of the song's CD appearances running approximately 4:47 and 3:09. If I may make a suggestion, I'm thinking it might be a bit more helpful for database subscribers if the comments were modified slightly to read "long 45 version" for the 4:47 entries and "short 45 version" for the 3:09 entries. That way, subscribers can more quickly scan down the song's CD listings and find the 45 edit they may be looking for. Edited by Todd Ireland |
|
|
|
|
KentT
Music Fan
Joined: 25 May 2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 April 2011 at 4:29pm |
|
Agreed, the 4:47 long single is the most common. And there is a mono version of it on 45.
|
|
|
I turn up the good and turn down the bad!
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Carras
Music Fan
Joined: 29 July 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 May 2013 at 12:48am |
|
The song was recorded back in 1966, all 11 minutes and change of it, and a very different recording starting with, instead of the cuckoo, what sounds like a pony whinnying and a clock bell.
|
|
|
You know you're really older when you think that younger singer Jesse McCartney's related in anyway to former Beatle Paul McCartney.
|
|
|
|
|
Hykker
Music Fan
Joined: 30 October 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 May 2013 at 5:18pm |
|
The 4:47 version has what sounds like ground-loop hum
towards the end of the song, where the metronome is slowing down, just before the "euuuh!". I've noticed later re-creations of this edit don't have it. Was it on the album? |
|
|
|
|
Yah Shure
Music Fan
Joined: 11 December 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 May 2013 at 9:32pm |
|
I don't have the vinyl The Time Has Come LP, but there's no ground-loop hum at all on that portion of the track on my promo copy of the vinyl The Chambers Brothers Greatest Hits LP.
Maybe someone thought the 4:47 single sounded more psychedelicized by throwing in some hum. :) |
|
|
|
|
Steve Carras
Music Fan
Joined: 29 July 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 April 2015 at 10:07pm |
You know that the metronome is supposed to be imitating a ticking clock, given the first word in the title, "Time". ; |
|
|
You know you're really older when you think that younger singer Jesse McCartney's related in anyway to former Beatle Paul McCartney.
|
|
|
|
|
eric_a
Music Fan
Joined: 29 June 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 April 2015 at 11:03am |
|
I have a copy that, like Jim's, is Columbia 44414 and listed 3:05, but
listening this weekend, it felt much longer. Sure enough, it appears to be the long single edit. My copy is too trashed to get a precise timing but it runs at least 4:40. The deadwax has a machine stamped code: zsp135996-3c. |
|
|
|
|
Steve Carras
Music Fan
Joined: 29 July 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 July 2015 at 9:34pm |
|
The song was recorded back in 1966, all 11 minutes and change of it, and a very different recording starting with, instead of the cuckoo, what sounds like a pony whinnying and a clock metronome.
Edited by Steve Carras |
|
|
You know you're really older when you think that younger singer Jesse McCartney's related in anyway to former Beatle Paul McCartney.
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options
Hykker wrote: