![]() |
Semi-OT: SiriusXM 70s on 7 Top 1000 |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123> |
Author | ||
sriv94 ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 16 September 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 07 September 2022 at 3:54pm |
|
Since some of you are a little more connected in the radio biz than I am, maybe you can answer this. Let
me give you the long drawn-out story. Grab yourself a beverage. :) Over the Labor Day weekend, SiriusXM's 70s on 7 channel did a listener-voted countdown of the Top 1000 of the 70s. And it was for the most part really well done. Lot of variety--including a number of songs that haven't aired on the channel in quite a while (even going back to the days when it was under different management and the music selection was a lot more liberal). An anonymous Reddit user (no, it wasn't me) was adventurous enough to listen to the entire top 1000. He/she was even more adventurous enough to type out the top 1000 longhand (for the benefit of the those of me who couldn't listen for all 58-some hours of the countdown). So I thought to myself, "Self, I have all of these songs in my library, so why not create a playlist just to be able to refer to it?" (I'm traveling next month, and it'd be great to load it onto my iPhone to listen on the plane.) I start work, I'm moving along at a really good clip (taking an all-70s playlist I have and working from there), and I find that Stevie Wonder's "Living For The City" (great record) winds up at 991...and at 596. Oy. While I love the record and could listen to it more than twice, somehow I don't think that what the programmer had in mind when compiling the votes. And doing a search of XMplaylist.com does indeed indicate the song was played twice within the 58-some hours of the countdown. EDIT: As does the On Demand section on the app. So the question is this--does anyone know who handles the programming for SiriusXM 70s on 7 so I can at least try to get an answer as to which position "Living For The City" should've been and what song should have been played in the other position? Thx! Edited by sriv94 |
||
Doug
--------------- All of the good signatures have been taken. |
||
![]() |
||
eriejwg ![]() Music Fan ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 June 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 53 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Ron Parker, who did afternoons at
WLS-FM a few years ago and is on 70s on 7 now, is pretty active on Facebook. You may want to reach out to him directly and he might be able to find out for you. |
||
![]() |
||
sriv94 ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 16 September 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
That's an idea. And I am friends with him on the Book of Face. Thx! |
||
Doug
--------------- All of the good signatures have been taken. |
||
![]() |
||
Paul C ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 23 October 2006 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 10 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Might one of them actually be the superb 1975 version by
Ray Charles, which won the 1975 R&B Male Vocal Grammy (#91 Hot 100, #22 R&B)? |
||
![]() |
||
sriv94 ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 16 September 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I would seriously doubt it. That’s a deep cut even for them. :) |
||
Doug
--------------- All of the good signatures have been taken. |
||
![]() |
||
Scanner ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 14 August 2019 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Did "You Light Up My Life" rank at all on this countdown?
I always marvel how that song is never included in any '70s retrospectives that are not determined objectively (e.g. charts, record sales). I was stunned when I watched "The Year In Music" for 1977 on AXS-TV and they did not even mention the song - they even listed the year's biggest Grammy winners and only noted "Evergreen" as Song Of The Year. The fact that this was the only time two songs tied for the award would have been worth noting "Light" for that reason alone. |
||
![]() |
||
sriv94 ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 16 September 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Yes. 450. It was listener-voted, so make from that what you will. Edited by sriv94 |
||
Doug
--------------- All of the good signatures have been taken. |
||
![]() |
||
Hykker ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 30 October 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 19 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Uhhhh, yeah. I take these "listener voted" surveys with a tablespoon of salt. Only a VERY small percentage of listeners EVER contact a "station" for any reason, let alone vote for these things, and you'd never even know about it if you weren't a S-XM subscriber so it's not exactly a representative group who's voting here. Back in the 70s I worked for a station that did a couple of these type of holiday weekend countdowns, and I can assure you that much fudging of the results took place! |
||
![]() |
||
torcan ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 23 June 2006 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 8 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
There wasn't fudging just on these all-time lists, but many radio station's weekly charts as well. Here in Toronto, both CHUM and CFTR published weekly charts in the newspapers. Both referred to them as "Toronto's Top Singles". During the '80s, CHUM's format changed to more of a rock/alternative format and many hit songs (like "Physical") never appeared on their lists. When "Thriller" hit big in '83, they moved back to more of a pop direction again. When I was in college. one of my instructors was a former CHUM employee. I asked him about the charts they compiled and he said "...basically you bull----, you TELL people that's what the No. 1 song is". |
||
![]() |
||
NightAire ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 20 February 2010 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Hi, another former radio jock here, can confirm: radio station charts are a combination of listener input, staff guesswork, and Music Director opinions.
Filled in one night in 1990 for the night jock on my local top 40. They did a "Top 8 At Eight" every weeknight. Asked where the log of requests were so I could start totaling them up. Was LAUGHED at, told we couldn't trust requests (partially true), and shown how listener input influenced but didn't determine the nightly countdown: "That song wouldn't have fallen from here to there, so we'll only move it a space or two. This song doesn't fit our format even though it got enough requests to land on the charts. We're wanting to see how many people will start reporting they like this song so we're putting it on the countdown every night..." I left the studio that night even more disillusioned than I had been before (which I didn't think was possible). (FWIW, when I survey people for my internet station every week, I'm ACTUALLY counting each vote and ACTUALLY playing songs more or less often based on the votes of my listener advisory board... 12 listeners who tell me each week what they think. That's why I think I can win, because I know broadcast stations DON'T do that. They think they're "smarter" than the listener. Sad, really.) |
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |